Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rco8786
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
rco8786
6d ago
That's extremely silly. drunk, inexperienced, and elderly drivers are all human drivers. You can't just exclude them from your baseline because they are not in perfect driving form. Let's also exclude young drivers, stupid dr
2.
▲
by
rco8786
6d ago
> I don't need to consult a datasheet or design an AI test suite with a zillion simulations and a bunch of closed-course tests. Traffic engineers have been doing this for decades though?
3.
▲
by
rco8786
9d ago
I don't know anything about this specific case but this exact thing will be a major barrier for autonomous vehicles to overcome. Instead of benchmarking AVs against the current, human-caused number of vehicular deaths - people will nat
4.
▲
by
rco8786
21d ago
Please, tell me more about my educational background.
5.
▲
by
rco8786
21d ago
Seems to me that the argument is really "are my premiums a passthrough to medical providers" and I have a really hard time answering Yes to that. If they are, then what do we call it when my medical expenses surpass my premiums? N
6.
▲
by
rco8786
21d ago
No, they're collecting money specifically on behalf of a 3rd party and then giving it directly to that 3rd party. They are custodians of that money only, it never even hits their bank account (goes into a dedicated trust account before
7.
▲
by
rco8786
21d ago
We have this in our harness markdown: ``` ## Comments Use comments extremely sparingly. Most comments should be at the request of the user. When something warrants a comment, keep it to one or two lines: what the code does and why it's
8.
▲
by
rco8786
21d ago
Not sure I'm buying it tbh. I'm no fan of the American healthcare system, but we don't need to invent new accounting to make it look worse than it is. Lots of businesses and industries have legal obligations to pay money for
9.
▲
by
rco8786
21d ago
Pretty sure that came after. And funding never made anyone smarter.
10.
▲
by
rco8786
25d ago
> With the 2026-07-28 release, a remote MCP server is now no different from any other HTTP workload Good. Introducing a bespoke new protocol was one of the more bone-headed things MCP did on initial release.
11.
▲
by
rco8786
27d ago
The related posts at the end are...interesting. > Three Strike Dismissal in One-On-Ones > Keith Rabois recommends to dismiss your report when you feel bad about an upcoming one on one more than three times in a row. Interesting. …
12.
▲
by
rco8786
1mo ago
I'm not really sure what point this article is trying to make
13.
▲
by
rco8786
1mo ago
I promise this isn't meant to be snarky, but is that not just...logs?
14.
▲
by
rco8786
1mo ago
But like, what is it? Odd that this reached #1 on HN. The README is pretty bare outside of installation instructions and a link to "Cordis", which is "A Meta-Framework of Spatiotemporal Composability." and "under ac
15.
▲
by
rco8786
1mo ago
> Nature has already proved it’s possible with 20 watts and very little heat generation Never thought of it in those terms before.
16.
▲
by
rco8786
1mo ago
Do you think that cutting funding to a lab would improve or hinder its ability to react to an outbreak like this one?
17.
▲
by
rco8786
1mo ago
> it will sometimes spend hours to do few line fix and other times pushback on making big changes despite have over 3000 tests. you ever worked with human engineers before? :D
18.
▲
by
rco8786
1mo ago
I remember reading this line from his Gas Town article: > I predicted someone would lash the Claude Code camels together into chariots, and that is exactly what I’ve done with Gas Town. He's literally patting himself on the back for
19.
▲
by
rco8786
1mo ago
The reviews (both the contents and total count) are not exactly confidence inducing.
20.
▲
by
rco8786
1mo ago
The article talks very directly about abandoning human code reviews. Couple that with a layer of AI agents whose purpose is to produce work for other AI agents, and you've got yourself a very efficient token burning feedback loop.
21.
▲
by
rco8786
1mo ago
> Measured, not vibes Sort of ironic considering that there are a LOT of vibe tells in the copy throughout this page. It's a neat looking project, it's a shame that every other sentence has Claude's fingerprints all over i
22.
▲
by
rco8786
2mo ago
> Populist. If scalding hot water and the risk of a burn do not scare you, buy the Boiler. A kettle for real patriots. Not suitable for herbal teas and other woke beverages. Used by veterans, among others. Made in this country, except fo
23.
▲
by
rco8786
3mo ago
> If you pay attention to what it's doing you can learn so much! I think your post is fair but it's worth pointing out that learning via watching is much less effective than learning via doing.
24.
▲
by
rco8786
3mo ago
> We already collectively produce more software than anyone really wants You'll need to qualify that statement...
25.
▲
by
rco8786
4mo ago
It's a coordination problem. 70 amazingly responsible adults still need to coordinate amongst one another. Ad hoc coordination and communication always breaks down eventually.
26.
▲
by
rco8786
4mo ago
Well yes, ideally. But real world codebases aren't clean enough to be used as the example ideal. Styles change over time, there are always code migrations and refactors in flight, legacy code exists, etc. Using specific examples of wha
27.
▲
by
rco8786
4mo ago
> AI is only as good as the person using it Nailed it. That said, it couldn't have possibly been that bad if you got it to "acceptable" in 2 weeks.
28.
▲
by
rco8786
4mo ago
This is fine for one off tools and I do the same. But building long-lived "professional grade" production software this fails real quickly. My team is using AI for most of the code, but the human review layer is crucial and unavoi
29.
▲
by
rco8786
4mo ago
Software engineers generate security bugs, Software engineers find them, then Software engineers generate fix, collect salary, profit?
30.
▲
by
rco8786
4mo ago
Yea. Modern Ruby is "fast enough", but it's very real that when Ruby was hitting its peak it was dog slow. It's hard to shake those sorts of reputations (similar to the "can't scale" reputation that Rails
More ›