rc00

7 ms·

1.
by rc00 1y ago
I would hope not. That would mean that no other vendor has shipped working ARM hardware support for Linux or has upstream support in the kernel. Forget the hostile nature Apple has proven to possess when consumers dare treat their hardware
2.
Fast memory vulnerabilities, written in 100% safe Rust(github.com)
7 points by rc00 1y ago|3 comments
3.
by rc00 1y ago
What adoption? Blog posts? Echo chambers? Rust peaked. The hype pushers don't want to believe it but that is the reality. Absolutely zero shade to Rust.
4.
by rc00 1y ago
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=all&searchon=names&...
5.
by rc00 1y ago
Posted 1 day ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44274592
6.
by rc00 1y ago
And Rust is the perfect lingua franca to accomplish this. The demise of both of these trends cannot come soon enough.
7.
by rc00 1y ago
And Rust is the perfect lingua franca to accomplish this. The demise of both of these trends cannot come soon enough.
8.
by rc00 1y ago
> What are my options? > I stick with Qt These come up on search results if you combine Qt plus the language. Go: * https://github.com/mappu/miqt Java: * https://github.com/OmixVisualization/
9.
by rc00 1y ago
You should evaluate on whether it is worth insisting on Rust. Others have gone down that path and it has only ended with regret[1]. The sooner you realize that you don't have the right solution to your problem, the sooner you can start
10.
by rc00 1y ago
> Many call for adding more to the rust standard library much like Go > So now I pose the question to you what do we do? 1. Port your application to the language/tool that fits your needs like Go. 2. Hope that a language like Zig
11.
by rc00 1y ago
The timing of the recent batch of propaganda makes it hard to believe it's not coordinated. I wouldn't suggest paid actors but maybe just an attempt to counter some fairly visible and negative recent takes. The amount of "I l
12.
by rc00 1y ago
> and then submitted here by someone > I just don’t care about karma that much. The first 500 is the only that matters. I find it hard to say that submitting a story that people found valuable is “abuse.” The submitting account is aut
13.
by rc00 1y ago
> This was posted by its author to /r/rust and then submitted here by someone because if a post does well over there, it often does well over here. That’s not “karma abuse”. Except the submitter account in question is actually
14.
by rc00 1y ago
> It refutes the idea that the "developer joy is pretty low" either way. https://deadmoney.gg/news/articles/migrating-away-from-rust https://loglog.games/blog/leaving-rust-gamedev
15.
by rc00 1y ago
Your link is from 2023 and references 2022. (It is also much more of an advertisement for Rust than anything else.) The one I shared before that is from late 2024. What are you trying to say other than Rust has peaked?
16.
by rc00 1y ago
https://github.blog/news-insights/octoverse/octoverse-2024/#... What are you talking about?
17.
by rc00 1y ago
+1 for Stern especially since it only has Go dependencies whereas Kubetail does not. Ease of integration with an existing stack is a bigger addition than the lack of a web UI is a subtraction.
18.
by rc00 1y ago
> I think Zig is mostly community-driven and seems to have some traction. Not Rust levels of traction but definitely relevance. Zig already appears to have lapped Rust in areas like game development, GUIs, compilation speeds, C FFI, etc.
19.
Migrating away from Rust(deadmoney.gg)
731 points by rc00 1y ago|759 comments
20.
by rc00 1y ago
Shared 12 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43675098
21.
by rc00 1y ago
What more do you need than "written in Rust"?
22.
by rc00 1y ago
Because it's written in Rust and this is Hacker News.
23.
by rc00 1y ago
> What in particular do you find cumbersome about the borrow system? The refusal to accept code that the developer knows is correct, simply because it does not fit how the borrow checker wants to see it implemented. That kind of heavy-ha
24.
by rc00 1y ago
Are you referring to static linking? Dynamic linking? Importing/inclusion? How does this translate (no pun intended) when the LLVM backend work is completed? Does this extend to reproducible builds? Hermetic builds? And the relationshi
25.
by rc00 1y ago
Open source or not isn't the point. The point is the mission and the ecosystem. Some of the Zig proponents laud the C compatibility. Others are seeking out the "pure Zig" ecosystem. Curious onlookers want to know if the Zig e
26.
by rc00 1y ago
Is Zig aiming to extend C or extinguish it? The embrace story is well-established at this point but the remainder is often unclear in the messaging from the community.
27.
by rc00 1y ago
I can see the appeal if there is a need for stronger metaprogramming. Not that Zig is terrible in this area, it is just that Jon's language is much more powerful in that area at this stage. That being said, I do see an issue with globa
28.
by rc00 1y ago
Rewrite it in Zig? You might even be able to sidestep the LLVM bottleneck entirely. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43016944
29.
by rc00 1y ago
Or don't use Rust. There are better and more supported options if you don't try to force a language where it clearly doesn't belong.
30.
by rc00 1y ago
> Regardless, my point was that Rust _the language_ does not provide garbage collection. These are language features not dependencies or external libraries. Maybe the best phrasing is that Rust's garbage collection features are opt-

More ›