rbinv

6 ms·

1.
by rbinv 16d ago
I think the question meant "to what extent did they mess it up" not "how did it happen".
2.
by rbinv 22d ago
32 GB GDDR 7
3.
Seattle 64(seattle64.benjasmin.chatgpt.site)
1 points by rbinv 23d ago|0 comments
4.
by rbinv 25d ago
I used Wireless Diagnostics.app on macOS ("Scan" window) and looked for the 2.4 GHz radio's MAC address which was nowhere to be found. But yeah, you have to have a hunch.
5.
by rbinv 25d ago
I've had similar issues with clients (Blink camera sync modules) connecting to far-away APs instead of the much closer router. I could not force them to connect directly to the router no matter what. Turns out the 2.4 GHz radio of my r
6.
Computer History(learn.chatgpt.com)
2 points by rbinv 1mo ago|1 comments
7.
by rbinv 1mo ago
Well... has it been the best so far?
8.
by rbinv 1mo ago
Thanks for the meme chuckle. For the uninitiated: https://i.imgflip.com/ayibmd.jpg
9.
by rbinv 2mo ago
Ente feels a lot like Smugmug did back then.
10.
by rbinv 2mo ago
Great thinking on your end! I will run the smoke-test once you're ready.
11.
by rbinv 3mo ago
I agree. Mowing the lawn is repetitive in a good way, almost meditative and flow-state-like.
12.
by rbinv 3mo ago
What city are you talking about specifically?
13.
by rbinv 3mo ago
People will pay for a good workflow/orchestration layer around coding models, see Cursor. I agree about the moat though, seems fragile.
14.
by rbinv 3mo ago
I find it refreshing to see dev tools competing on latency again. Has anyone tried both Conductor and Zed for agentic coding on a real project? How do they compare?
15.
by rbinv 4mo ago
Codex offers a -spark model that runs on Cerebras. Not quite 17k tok/s, but _very_ fast nonetheless. Worth a look.
16.
by rbinv 5mo ago
Maybe the 4.7 inference is cheaper than 4.6? Just guessing.
17.
Steve Jobs, speech at the Apple campus (1999) [video](youtube.com)
1 points by rbinv 6mo ago|0 comments
18.
by rbinv 8mo ago
They've been rendering crawled pages using Chromium for many years now. Hidden text does not work as a ranking manipulation tactic.
19.
by rbinv 11mo ago
How does that work?
20.
by rbinv 1y ago
The editing and added audio certainly add to the realism, but this is really impressive nonetheless.
21.
Imagine with Claude(claude.ai)
1 points by rbinv 1y ago|1 comments
22.
An AI Index for all our customers(blog.cloudflare.com)
2 points by rbinv 1y ago|0 comments
23.
Mosh Mobile Shell(mosh.org)
155 points by rbinv 1y ago|78 comments
24.
by rbinv 1y ago
Agreed. Big tech is trying to become the media industry.
25.
by rbinv 1y ago
Thanks, I was not aware! I thought they offered all their models via their API.
26.
by rbinv 1y ago
From the abstract: > This photonic-architectured cement achieved a temperature drop of 5.4°C during midday conditions with a solar intensity of 850 watts per square meter. This supercool cement featured intrinsic high strength, armored a
27.
Scalable metasurface-enhanced supercool cement(science.org)
2 points by rbinv 1y ago|1 comments
28.
by rbinv 1y ago
Afaik, there is currently no "GPT-5 Pro". Did you mean o3-pro or o1-pro (via API)? Currently, GPT-5 sits at $10/1M output tokens, o3-pro at $80, and o1-pro at a whopping $600: https://platform.openai.com/docs&
29.
by rbinv 1y ago
o3 can be re-enabled in the settings ("Show additional models") if you're a paid (Plus) user.
30.
by rbinv 1y ago
I think it's more appropriate to compare GPT 5 Thinking to o3. You will find that the response times are actually quite similar (at least in my experience over hundreds of identical prompts with each model).

More ›