razwall

6 ms·

1.
by razwall 5mo ago
Luna responds to your comments: https://andon.market/on-running-a-real-business.html
2.
by razwall 7mo ago
They're overwhelmed with all the vibecoded apps people are pushing after watching the Super Bowl.
3.
by razwall 4y ago
Sounds like you're using "Home" view. You can switch to "latest Tweets" view, which would eliminate 4, 5, 6, and 10 from your list.
4.
by razwall 4y ago
Per their latest annual report: "As of January 31, 2022, we had 7,461 employees, of which approximately 67% were in sales, marketing and customer success, 20% in engineering, product development and customer operations and 13% in gener
5.
by razwall 5y ago
It was common law copyright, not derived from the copyright clause of the Constitution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law_copyright
6.
by razwall 5y ago
What you say is mostly true, but in the case of sound recordings from before 1972, it's actually the opposite. At the time such recordings were made, they were subject to an infinite copyright term! The Music Modernization Act [1] pass
7.
by razwall 6y ago
Interesting. Does anyone ever fail this part of the interview?
8.
by razwall 7y ago
You expect the company to be worth $10b at some point in the future, but the question to be answered is how much you think the company is worth today. Let's say you think the company is worth $10m now, which makes your stock worth $10k
9.
by razwall 7y ago
Dilution is a red herring. It doesn't change the value of your shares (theoretically). What will matter is how the company spends the funds that it raises, and whether it does so in a way that generates a positive or negative return on
10.
by razwall 8y ago
In case anyone is wondering, interstate wagering on horse races is specifically allowed in federal law by the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978, so it's not affected by this reinterpretation of the Wire Act.
11.
by razwall 9y ago
The article is about the insider trading charges that were filed against him today, so yeah.
12.
by razwall 9y ago
Not through an ordinary appeal, but they could file for an extraordinary writ. Given the number of small claims cases that Equifax has been facing, it might be something they would consider.
13.
Blockchain company buys 67,000 acres at Northern Nevada industrial park(thenevadaindependent.com)
2 points by razwall 9y ago|0 comments
14.
by razwall 9y ago
Except that Service Worker support is a prerequisite for supporting the standard Push API, and push notifications are probably the most common usage of Service Workers. So it's a reasonable question.
15.
by razwall 9y ago
Fair enough, but it seems arbitrary and capricious to single out debt collection as the one and only business function that you're not allowed to outsource. Just like accounting, payroll, advertising, lawyering, etc., it requires a spe
16.
by razwall 9y ago
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/henson-v-santande... They were simply confirming the plain meaning of the FDCPA, which applies to people who collect debt that is owed to another person. Junk debt buyers
17.
by razwall 9y ago
What other kind of endeavor could it possibly be?
18.
by razwall 9y ago
No, bonuses are taxed at the same rate as salary. The withholding calculations are different, so you tend to have a bigger chunk taken out of your bonus check. But if that chunk is greater than your actual tax rate, you'll get the diff
19.
by razwall 9y ago
Why is it harder to win?
20.
by razwall 9y ago
Neither of the Craigslist cases reached an appellate level. They were only district court decisions, so as I understand it, they only have persuasive value when applied to other cases. The judge in this case mentioned Craigslist v. 3Taps ,
21.
by razwall 9y ago
We can hope that this case will set a legal precedent, but it may, like the Craigslist case, end in a settlement (or some other disposition) before that point is reached.
22.
by razwall 9y ago
Indeed, and the court rejected that part of HiQ's argument. "In light of the potentially sweeping implications discussed above and the lack of any more direct authority, the Court cannot conclude that hiQ has at this juncture rais
23.
by razwall 9y ago
From reading the ruling, the injunction was based on a finding that HiQ raised serious questions about whether LinkedIn blocking HiQ's scrapers constituted a violation of California's unfair competition law by violating the spirit
24.
by razwall 9y ago
That might be your opinion of what the law should be, and I wouldn't disagree with that opinion, but it's not what the law says.
25.
by razwall 9y ago
Actually this has come up before with a similar law in Arizona, where the state tried to ban Zestimates. Volokh's analysis basically agreed with me ( http://volokh.com/posts/1177792494.shtml ). Though I couldn'
26.
by razwall 9y ago
I agree. So where is the line between an "off-hand comment" that's not subject to the law, and an appraisal that constitutes a misdemeanor? Is it illegal if you post your comment on Facebook? Or on your blog where you talk ab
27.
by razwall 9y ago
Take a look at the law they're suing under, regarding licensing of real estate appraisers ( http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp?DocName=02250... ). It makes it illegal to "develop a real estate
28.
by razwall 10y ago
The main reason given is that the article was original research. In other words, it was not just unsourced, but fundamentally unsourceable. There is nowhere an editor can go to reliably determine whether the entries in the list are correct
29.
by razwall 10y ago
Those importance ratings are utterly unimportant. In the vast majority of cases, they are just the opinion of a single editor who looked at the article for 10 seconds, and they only affect how the article is listed in some automated report
30.
by razwall 10y ago
In general, a more specific law trumps a more general law, and a later law trumps an earlier enacted law. So the more specific rule of "States may ask for SSN's for tax purposes" would override the general rule of "State

More ›