raviparikh

6 ms·

1.
by raviparikh 2y ago
Whether covered under fair use or not, the laws around copyright today did not anticipate this use case. Congress should pass laws that clarify how data is and isn’t allowed to be used in training AI models, how creators should or shouldn’t
2.
by raviparikh 3y ago
I make about $4,000 per million streams on Spotify for the tracks I’ve released independently. For label releases I make less, but the label promotes them so that sometimes results in more net revenue. I have a bit over 10M Spotify streams
3.
Airplane Autopilot: Build internal tools faster with an AI coding assistant(airplane.dev)
3 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
4.
AI Safety FAQ(aisafety.info)
1 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
5.
by raviparikh 3y ago
Not sure if this is what you're implying, but I think it's a mistake to think of YC as a monolithic organization that makes decisions by saying, "idea X is good, we should fund teams doing it." More likely, each of the t
6.
by raviparikh 3y ago
And similarly to climate, many people who signed this letter are academics who do not appear to have any financial incentive to push for government regulation.
7.
by raviparikh 3y ago
The richest person in the world, Elon Musk, is a climate entrepreneur who got there in part due to climate-driven government subsidies. Just because someone made money off it though does not mean that climate change is a fake concern.
8.
by raviparikh 3y ago
(Airplane founder here) Airplane isn't YC backed. Though interestingly my prior startup, Heap, went through YC and has tons of YC-backed competitors (Amplitude, Mixpanel, Posthog, etc). Personally I like that YC remains agnostic to the
9.
AI Scientists: Safe and Useful AI?(yoshuabengio.org)
2 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
10.
It is starting to get strange(oneusefulthing.org)
3 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
11.
JPMorgan Chase takes over First Republic after bank failure(cnbc.com)
2 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
12.
Concrete Steps to Get Started in Transformer Mechanistic Interpretability(neelnanda.io)
1 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
13.
AI represents a new type of platform risk to startups(airplane.dev)
1 points by raviparikh 3y ago|1 comments
14.
by raviparikh 3y ago
I'm one of the co-founders at Airplane - if you end up evaluating it, feel free to send me a note at ravi@airplane.dev if I can help. > I think there’s an opportunity to integrate LLMs so that non technical users can build on top of
15.
AI suggested 40k new possible chemical weapons in just six hours(theverge.com)
44 points by raviparikh 3y ago|46 comments
16.
Concrete Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability(alignmentforum.org)
1 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
17.
The Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty and existential AGI risk(marginalrevolution.com)
1 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
18.
What generative AI can and can’t do(airplane.dev)
2 points by raviparikh 3y ago|1 comments
19.
Response to Tyler Cowen on AI Risk(forourposterity.com)
1 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
20.
AI as smart as humans would be the most powerful entity in the world(ravisparikh.substack.com)
1 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
21.
by raviparikh 3y ago
"haphazardly slapped together" describes ~99% of all startups that raise seed funding, and is often correlated with success.
22.
Task-Driven Autonomous Agent(twitter.com)
2 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
23.
Nobody’s on the Ball on AGI Alignment(forourposterity.com)
3 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
24.
U.S. Copyright Office says some AI-assisted works may be copyrighted(reuters.com)
2 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
25.
by raviparikh 3y ago
Yes, Cowen argues against the idea we can anticipate consequences of technological change, and the specific consequence he focuses on is the idea of existential risk stemming from AI. He says because technology is unpredictable, we should
26.
by raviparikh 3y ago
No one thinks ChatGPT will end the world. People are afraid of AI systems that will exist in the future.
27.
by raviparikh 3y ago
That’s perfectly valid! No one is obligated to respond or engage with any specific argument. But my point was that if you do choose to engage, saying “the world didn’t end before so it will be fine now” is invalid.
28.
The world can only end once(ravisparikh.substack.com)
33 points by raviparikh 3y ago|64 comments
29.
Let's think about slowing down AI(worldspiritsockpuppet.substack.com)
3 points by raviparikh 3y ago|0 comments
30.
by raviparikh 4y ago
Thanks for taking the time to read the article and comment. Appreciate your feedback. As you point out, my last couple paragraphs were somewhat speculative and handwav-y. Do you have an alternative viewpoint on what allows LLMs to be able t

More ›