Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ratmice
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ratmice
4d ago
Perhaps it refers to PhantomData<!> but I don't know
2.
▲
by
ratmice
20d ago
Boxed slice isn't really the most well known type/optimization, There usually aren't that many vec's that it makes a big difference.
3.
▲
by
ratmice
2mo ago
> We do not grant access to our license plate readers to federal law enforcement. That sounds very weasel worded, if they get license plate readers from someone who does.
4.
▲
by
ratmice
2mo ago
Thats not the point, if there were a better proprietary engine stockfish would still be there as a baseline. Anyone can access an engine as good as stockfish to practice against. Are any open models touting mathematical breakthroughs?
5.
▲
by
ratmice
2mo ago
Another noteworthy difference is that Stockfish is also gpl.
6.
▲
by
ratmice
2mo ago
It would be nice if OP noted what caused the change in their opinion? did datafusion gain some feature that they noted was missing in the previous article, or did something in their understanding click so they could overcome the previous is
7.
▲
by
ratmice
2mo ago
What I was (badly) trying to express was more that given static bounds rust could also eliminate dynamic checks. So saying e.g. ATS can eliminate static checks, is kind of switching the target.
8.
▲
by
ratmice
2mo ago
those are not dynamic bounds.
9.
▲
by
ratmice
4mo ago
It is fine though if people who don't knit enjoy knitting podcasts, but this is not that. Somewhere between the producer/consumer relationship there should exist some actual knitting. Otherwise (in cases like this) it's just
10.
▲
by
ratmice
4mo ago
I'd also say a few things, if knitting takes a long time consider how long it takes to make a good clear pattern so that others can replicate it. People who make patterns are already dealing with a saturated market. This includes histo
11.
▲
by
ratmice
4mo ago
Seriously? You can't get the feeling of satisfaction of wearing something, or having someone wear something you made from AliExpress. My point is your sense of feeling and validation is extremely distorted if you have no knitted materi
12.
▲
by
ratmice
4mo ago
Can't wear feelings and validation...
13.
▲
by
ratmice
6mo ago
My only complaint with the article is that it doesn't seem to mention that digitized proofs can contain gaps but that those gaps must be explicit like in lean the `sorry` function, or axioms.
14.
▲
by
ratmice
7mo ago
In FCC DA 26-68 they gave public notice of their change of interpretation/enforcement of the equal time rules to apply to this situation.
15.
▲
by
ratmice
8mo ago
Definitions are built up layer upon layer like an onion too, with each step adding it's own invariants reducing the problem space. I just feel like the street light example is an extremely small free standing example. Most things that
16.
▲
by
ratmice
8mo ago
Maybe it can be done, but I struggle to believe adding in that branch for every forall quantifier (which may be plentiful in a proof) is going to help make a proof more understandable. Rather I feel like it'll just balloon the number o
17.
▲
by
ratmice
8mo ago
Rhetorical sentence? My point is that back-translation into natural langauge is translating into a less precise form. How is that going to help? No number of additional abstraction layers are going to solve human confusion.
18.
▲
by
ratmice
8mo ago
why do we invent these formal languages except to be more semantically precise than natural language? What does one gain besides familiarity by translation back into a more ambiguous language? Mis-defining concepts can be extremely subtle,
19.
▲
by
ratmice
8mo ago
Sure, in the Result case, less in the option case. I didn't mention it because Infallible is documented and named specifically as an Error "The error type for errors that can never happen". The use of uninhabited types as an
20.
▲
by
ratmice
8mo ago
The sum of the note and the gpl doesn't behave as though the notice has any precedence over the gpl. It behaves as additional restrictions and a license that allows you to ignore the additional restrictions. I'm no lawyer but it s
21.
▲
by
ratmice
8mo ago
> Proprietary use, commercial redistribution, or publishing modified versions with ads or tracking is strictly prohibited under GPLv3 or later. These all sound to me like "Further restrictions" which the GPL says: > If the P
22.
▲
by
ratmice
8mo ago
I feel like another optimization that rust code can exploit is uninhabited types. When combined with generics and sum types these can lead to entire branches being unreachable at the type level. Like Option<!> or Result<T, !>, r
23.
▲
by
ratmice
9mo ago
I always feel that when saying lex/yacc style tools, it comes with a lot of preconceived notions that using the tools involves a slow development cycle with code gen + compilation steps. What drew me to the grmtools (eventually contrib
24.
▲
by
ratmice
9mo ago
I would also say there is a 3rd class, which are distributed capabilities. When you look at a mobile program such as the GadgetBridge which is synchronizing data between a mobile device and a watch, and number of permissions it requires lik
25.
▲
by
ratmice
9mo ago
I couldn't agree with you more, the thing is our underlying security models are protecting systems from their users, but do nothing for protecting user data from the programs they run. Capability based security model will fix that.
26.
▲
by
ratmice
9mo ago
I wasn't able to google it, or find a public link to the email (but it was posted on a public list) so here is some relevant snippets from it. Nov 20 2022 titled CapROS status "When I retired a year ago I hoped to correct some of
27.
▲
by
ratmice
9mo ago
Yeah, I did see a email on a capabilities list from him about him no longer working on it because of lack of feedback & wanting to just enjoy his retirement. That was the impression I got. When he had resumed his work on it, I personal
28.
▲
by
ratmice
9mo ago
I'd also note capros doesn't fit that description either. I don't know that there were examples that ran more than a single process. That's probably not true, for anything relying on drivers since user mode drivers are b
29.
▲
by
ratmice
9mo ago
I wish he had just said 50 years of LCF, since he even mentions automath in the article but that was but that was late 60s
30.
▲
by
ratmice
10mo ago
Presumably unsigned want to return errors too? Edit: I guess they could get rid of a few numbers... Anyhow it isn't a philosophy that is going to get me to consider nimony for anything.
More ›