raspberry1337

8 ms·

1.
by raspberry1337 3y ago
All freespeech platforms, from 4chan to twitter, are pre-dominantly right wing. All censorship-based platforms, such as reddit or mastodon that has _mods_, are left wing. Secondly, the woke left is the same in the US as it is in Europe. The
2.
by raspberry1337 3y ago
It's not really a problem if none cares who you are.
3.
by raspberry1337 3y ago
You're neo-nazi!
4.
by raspberry1337 3y ago
Furthermore, leftism needs to have these banning-systems because modern leftism cannot survive in a free speech environment. This is why all leftists started leaving twitter when Musk took over and promised free speech (not freedom of reach
5.
by raspberry1337 3y ago
"I don't think so. Please provide concrete examples." You would get fired in Sweden if you spoke against mass immigration just 15 years ago. The social democrats still ban people who have romantic relationships with an indivi
6.
by raspberry1337 3y ago
I don't think firing middle management, documenters and designers with no trackable productiveness and forcing people to work in their free time is the same thing ?
7.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
I have a lot of solutions, I proposed reduced immigration in Sweden 10 years before the leftists realized it was a necessity. I have loads of more solutions now too, but it will probably take 10 years for the left to realize they are inevit
8.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
If you are gonna say ridiculous things online, it's supposed to be funny. Then again, there aren't any (successful) leftist comedians left anymore. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodernism https:/&#x
9.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
France has smaller manufacturing than the UK [1], neither France or Germany has never been "ruled by unions" the same way that the UK was in the 70s [2]: > _The most egregious example of waste was the coal industry, hence the s
10.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
> Small cities put children in a disadvantage and should not exist This is the kind of radical bat shit craziness, from posters who are so intelligent they can rationalize anything, craziness that I love to find on HN. I went to high sch
11.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
Ironic you blame the Tories, since all those industries primarily died of during the 70s, after the collapse of Bretton-woods; when unionist Labour ruled the country by marxist-economist principles.
12.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
Which is a discussion of what they are supposed to be shipping. Usually a description of a program, in text. A discussion that very often ends in court over disagreements. Have you ever worked on a commercial software?
13.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
We do, they named the least productive yet most experienced gentleman to "teach lead" to lead the scrums because they started getting a notion that not much was getting done. This is the guy who love writing documentation (One A4
14.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
It's not about will, but the managers capability to oversee what is going on. Since they dont know anything about programming, they cant even really know if someone is slacking, or working really hard. That is, their capability to man
15.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
It's my first gig, so my options are limited. Things might still shake up when people start asking where all the money is going. But I've also come to realize that my situation is not unique, there's a lot of non-work going o
16.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
I didn't write it out, but our managers have no idea of the code at all. They have never been programmers. Hence the programmers sit around all day, like posting on HN, and not much gets done at all. But hey they are surely really pass
17.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
I don't work at Meta, but if its anything like where I currently work, the ones who become "managers" have no correlation to coding performance, or perfomance at all for that matter.
18.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
Me too. I wish I could work at a company where I dont have a "project manager" making more than I do for sending a few emails and holding a weekly project meeting. I've decided to practice leetcode if that's what it take
19.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
So they amicably saved all depositors in SVB, but not investors, because using taxpayers money to protect bad investment would be very unfair - unless its too big to fail, then it's "necessary". Otherwise we could get a depre
20.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
>Having your bank account randomly disappear isn't one of the risks that anyone should have to take. This bank choose to _avoid_ safety regulations from the 2008 financial crisis, which is completely open information. They used this
21.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
What a weird post. >Lots of people are starving and homeless for as trivial a "decision" as that. Most homeless are either severely mentally ill, drug addicted, usually both. >I'd much rather give everybody food and a h
22.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
> Also Britons who live in areas with large immigrant populations are the least concerned about immigration. Maybe if you define immigrants with passports as Britons. There's a reason why the BNP, British National Party, won the two
23.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
It's not over yet, we're yet to see the how the opposite of mass immigration multiculturalism affects a european nation too. Jusging by Sweden and Germany who has applied it the most, it is and ending that goes "no more pleas
24.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
If you can't see that immigration is having a negative impact, which so many voters perceive, then yes you have a minority perspective. Crime in the UK is so bad in some areas that Ukrainian refugees were shocked.
25.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
That's not true at all, just because one individual person can make a temporary, big profit in an industry, that does not mean that the industry itself is profitable. Industry has large investment costs and takes time to become profita
26.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
Gulf war didn't save Senior Bush from the bad-economy, neither did the Iraq War help Tony Blair's popularity. It's a lot more complex than war-helps-current-leader, at least outside the US. It depends on the war and the conte
27.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
Nothing in that article indicates that the war overshadowed her domestic policy, both contributed to her success.
28.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
It is, and neither more neo-liberalism nor socialism is the answer.
29.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
>"The conservative and republican parties are mocking parodies of their former selves. Back in the 80s there were serious, major economic and social problems that desperately needed fixing and economic liberalism had the answers. No
30.
by raspberry1337 4y ago
Do you understand that solar as a economic investment, and the economics of one dude that install solars, are very different things?

More ›