Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rapind
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
rapind
6d ago
You're taking a small slice of left progressives and applying it to all democrats to try and push this "the left are all commies" narrative. ICE is running around like the gestapo in targeted blue cities, so of course it'
2.
▲
by
rapind
6d ago
> Butt out of our political commentary. Don't be ridiculous. I'd love it if I didn't have to care about US politics, except it has infected the rest of the world. Telling someone to butt out when your dear leader is invadi
3.
▲
by
rapind
7d ago
> The "Bernie bro" to MAGA pipeline is very real, as was the "I wanna make sexist or racist jokes" to Alt-Right pipeline. It would have been so easy for the Democrats to embrace economics and labour over culture war a
4.
▲
by
rapind
7d ago
Multiplayer, demographic, community, and probably because it mainstreamed the genre. I'm pretty sure people, especially early teens, like to socialize on Minecraft with their friends. There is also the pseudo campaign of defeating the
5.
▲
by
rapind
8d ago
China's model for decades has been to do it cheaper and then do it better for cheaper. Just accepting this makes you an economic vassal state. We've seen this play out over decades now with other industries. I'm not blaming C
6.
▲
by
rapind
8d ago
I think the route to profitability is super clear and simple. To be a reasonable alternative to Chinese and US models. I think you're probably better off using the Chinese open models right now if you're concerned about vendor loc
7.
▲
by
rapind
8d ago
Also, JD Vance and the AfD...
8.
▲
by
rapind
11d ago
Also tons and tons of coal. Hopefully just a stopgap.
9.
▲
by
rapind
11d ago
At least we've discovered that trying to get people to behave differently at scale without the presence of an *immediate* emergency is a failed endeavour... So maybe now we can stop that nonsense and focus all of our energy on technolo
10.
▲
by
rapind
12d ago
> The escalations continue in complexity and speed to the point that almost all humans are left in the point of "wtf is going on". Humans are paper clips long before that.
11.
▲
by
rapind
12d ago
If Trump tomorrow says communism is great, then every Fox news host, MAGA content creator, and MAGA bot would be extolling the virtues of communism. The republican house and senate would enable it, maybe with a small bribe here and there. T
12.
▲
by
rapind
15d ago
Everyone who started using claude clode when it came out in early 2025, knew it was coming (not quite yet). That felt more like reporting than prophesying.
13.
▲
by
rapind
18d ago
I always figured that was part of the joke, because a writer came up with it, and a writer would know (I assume?).
14.
▲
by
rapind
18d ago
It's not about the prompt, it's about the guardrails. Static types, compiled, massive test suite, etc. That what I mean by extreme level of test coverage like SQLite. You'd actually need to be an expert in C and SQLite and th
15.
▲
by
rapind
18d ago
Extremes on both sides. I'd wager were moving in Yegge's direction though, like it or not. > Though it's being argued that you could still be responsible for it without looking at it? If you have a much test coverage as SQ
16.
▲
by
rapind
20d ago
> Not because they care about doing the right thing, but purely for self preservation reasons Call me crazy, but this is something I want in a democracy. Less ideology and more pragmatism.
17.
▲
by
rapind
21d ago
These open models serve as price / performance pressure. Not all tasks require frontier models and cheap open models can be quite good for in-app assistants, if you're building that sort of thing. We also aren't sure the subs
18.
▲
by
rapind
27d ago
> although I will say that the speed I'm able to get locally makes it more fun that any of the remote models. This is becoming increasingly important to me. Super smart max reasoning frontier is fine if I leave it running overnight
19.
▲
by
rapind
28d ago
It’s not at all hard to not “intentionally” build asshole software, but your definitely leaving money on the table. The nit pick arguments are just a defence to avoid honesty and introspection IMO.
20.
▲
by
rapind
1mo ago
> I'm not sure that typing messages to a chat bot requires much catching up Lol, yeah I'd wager AI tooling skills are less relevant than knowing your way around a shell. It doesn't help that all of the AI tooling has event
21.
▲
by
rapind
1mo ago
Wait, so you are saying that Farage did not receive an undisclosed £5 million personal gift from a cryptocurrency billionaire? Or he did, but any reporting on it is obviously the deep state ganging up on him?
22.
▲
by
rapind
1mo ago
> What happened to all the Internet energy, likes, shares, and blog and social media posts? I suspect this is sarcasm? Farage did underperform and Binface did exceed expectations so... I'm not sure whether or not that's due to
23.
▲
by
rapind
1mo ago
Or Don Jr. as an advisor who was granted equity.
24.
▲
by
rapind
1mo ago
I used to hold this opinion but since changing to Rust on the server and Typescript on the client, I can confidently tell you agents are so much better at Rust, especially at producing idiomatic code, than they are at Gleam. There are reaso
25.
▲
by
rapind
1mo ago
I suspect he wants the AR features (which require a camera). The no camera HUD is exactly what I want, except I also want SSH (Mosh) and sending text to speech to it before I'd buy these.
26.
▲
by
rapind
1mo ago
> When an American company does anything? Doom. And. Gloom. The engineers? Taken to the slaughterhouse! America? Behind! The public? Bamboozeled! I think I've always had a pretty healthy amount of cynicism towards China. In recent y
27.
▲
by
rapind
1mo ago
> Video games are now ruined for me. I don't think I will ever feel safe playing online again. Agreed, also WordPress powers around 43% of all websites on the internet. https://patchstack.com/whitepaper/state-of
28.
▲
by
rapind
1mo ago
Pretty sure this is a performance, but that was a nice touch wasn't it?
29.
▲
by
rapind
1mo ago
I wish. Look up "coal rolling".
30.
▲
by
rapind
1mo ago
You're not wrong, but it simply isn't politically viable, which has been illustrated quite obviously by now. The "use less" strategy is a complete (and predictable) failure.
More ›