randompeach

5 ms·

1.
by randompeach 1mo ago
Where all based on SES? :D because that is what I see every freaking day.
2.
ISRG (LetsEncrypt) has created two new roots [pdf](letsencrypt.org)
2 points by randompeach 10mo ago|1 comments
3.
by randompeach 10mo ago
ISRG generated two new roots a few days ago. - Root YE - Root RE
4.
Boycott IETF 127(boycott-ietf127.org)
572 points by randompeach 1y ago|358 comments
5.
Hashmap implementation techniques for fun and profit(sio.mataroa.blog)
2 points by randompeach 2y ago|0 comments
6.
by randompeach 2y ago
Meerfarbig in Frankfurt. Nikhef in Amsterdam. Both are good options.
7.
by randompeach 2y ago
SMIME will become PQC as well as GPG (as of my knowledge). SMIME will also get an ACME standard for issuing. Including a handful of CAs that will likely issue free Certificates for it.
8.
by randompeach 2y ago
As of my knowledge: no.
9.
by randompeach 2y ago
I personally find token2 really nice.
10.
by randompeach 2y ago
Let’s start my comment new /o\ My guess is that noting will happen for now. It’s mostly a decision that ICANN working groups have to figure out. But given the current size of the .io zone and that we already have a non existing cctld (
11.
Operation Final Exchange(finalexchange.de)
2 points by randompeach 2y ago|0 comments
12.
by randompeach 2y ago
I mean… they don’t need to care that much with 200mio€ profit. But yes a smother signup, potentially coupled with a prepaid credit (via 3-D Secure) and or eID would be the easiest and safest solution for everyone. Atleast if it’s clearly st
13.
by randompeach 2y ago
„German Family Business“ is my bet. They have their own internal security team, that handles activation on a case by case basis. Some users need to verify at the beginning, some after a week and other do not have to verify at all. As you ca
14.
by randompeach 2y ago
I would guess that 8-10k per year without the icann / tld fees, is a good starting point.
15.
by randompeach 2y ago
DNS via cloudns for example is around 10ct per Zone per Month via there DDoD Protected package. Email Infrastructure (for renewal etc.) can be acquired over different services like postmark. Validation of contact data can be expensive too.
16.
by randompeach 2y ago
Depends on the volume. But it’s mostly under the 80k required capital. There are even some open source implementations for the backends. Most expensive points are the required employees and the signup fees (and prepaid) for other registry’s
17.
by randompeach 2y ago
age-encryption.org their project has a good documentation / standard of how age encryption works. Helped me to understand this topic better.
18.
WebAuthentication PRF Extension Beta at Apple(developer.apple.com)
1 points by randompeach 2y ago|0 comments
19.
Servers don't like it hot(leah.is)
2 points by randompeach 2y ago|0 comments
20.
by randompeach 2y ago
As in: not that google decides to remove the domain, because you did not follow the requirements thing and only as “wasn’t there something” from my side.
21.
by randompeach 2y ago
Hey Ehm short questions: didn’t .new have a requirement for the usage of the TLD? e.g. example.new should forward to a website that allowed to create examples?
22.
by randompeach 2y ago
Non-Profit based ACME CA in Europe. We want to establish an alternative to Let’s Encrypt that is taking the core features and values from ISRG. That’s not based on “bad US!1!”, more then a alternative would strengthen the ecosystem. This al
23.
by randompeach 2y ago
For clients that support ARI, they also waived all rate limits. So thats nice.
24.
An Engineer's Guide to Integrating ARI into Existing Acme Clients(letsencrypt.org)
2 points by randompeach 2y ago|1 comments
25.
by randompeach 2y ago
My thing is, that a true alternative would atleast offer the same features at the same price point. I’d also a registered non profit: even better.
26.
by randompeach 2y ago
Buypass is based in Norway. Sadly no wildcard. Section is based in the UK. Also no wild card. ZeroSSL is based in Austria. But they are technically a reseller from Sectigo (using a branded intermediate.)
27.
by randompeach 2y ago
Fair. Yes.
28.
by randompeach 2y ago
Thanks forgot that point totally/o\
29.
by randompeach 2y ago
They are alternatives. With true I wanted to specifically point to: nonprofit and same features (so not only simple DV for free accounts but also wildcard.)
30.
by randompeach 2y ago
The “requirements”a re things that I already had in mind. The US part is based on legal framework. Based on stuff like politics and such. So another jurisdiction, das would allow the same model then let’s encrypt, would add to the ecosystem

More ›