Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
randomidiot666
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
If you actually read his comment, I think you'll agree this was an accurate and fair assessment. I've worked with those kids who believe they're super smart and others are simpletons purely based on tool preferences.
2.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
Not obvious. Whatever.
3.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
As someone else mentioned here, the graphical merge tool in IDEA is extremely powerful. Plus keyboard shortcuts to all the main Git actions. It's overall more efficient. However I always use Git IDEA + Git CLI side by side.
4.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
You can always get the EAP version for free. It's probably stable enough for your rarely touched Go program https://www.jetbrains.com/resources/eap/
5.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
Thank Garbage Collected languages. I just checked the IDEA config and found its maximum heap is set to 750 MB by default. You typically wouldn't need 32GB to run it.
6.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
You are delusional and immature. I've seen experienced Vim/Emacs kiddies like you really struggle to keep up with my productivity levels in IDEA with JVM languages. Doing everything at the command line doesn't make you 1337 a
7.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
File -> Settings -> Keymap -> Configure
8.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
Yes it is
9.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
Yes ideally you would be some kind of indistinguishable Borg creature.
10.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
Then make something useful, at least for yourself. A tool that helps your productivity. An emulator that you will actually play games on.
11.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
What's the point of a professional violinist playing aesthetically pleasing music alone without an audience? The point is self improvement, self education. It is incredible that some people don't understand such basic things.
12.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
This is for self education as much as self amusement. Have you never done an assignment at school/college/university?
13.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
I am always right. Go sucks and Java wins. (just kidding)
14.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
>> If better GCs come out or tweaks to the algorithms are made, these configurations have to be updated. In contrast, Go programs gets these benefits for free. > There is no reason why Java can't do the same by updating defaul
15.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
Yet another person who only skimmed the article and hasn't read Part 1, which explains GC tuning tradeoffs and addresses the two examples you mentioned. Part 1 debunks the dishonest marketing from Google around Go's GC when it was
16.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
But he didn't say that. That's your own ridiculous emotional projection. The article contains very thoughtful criticism backed by detailed analysis. I don't think you even bothered to read the full articles (there is a part 1
17.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
Why? Did he hurt Go's feelings? It's a programming language, not a child. I prefer his honest assessment of their relative strengths and weaknesses.
18.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
But I wasn't talking about Artificial Intelligence or problem solving. I am talking about Actual Intelligence, specifically human level intelligence. If we build AI we could only know if its conscious if we know what conscious is, and
19.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
I wrote "computation", not "arithmetic". Human intelligence goes beyond computation / mathematical logic, and you seem to ignore all of that. We haven't got a clue how consciousness works. It's a total mys
20.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
I clarified it in my latest reply above. The original comment asked if there is any doubt as to whether a neuron can be represented computationally. We don't know exactly what a neuron is, and are still discovering new subtle mechanism
21.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
No I'm saying: "We don't have a perfectly accurate physical model of consciousness, we know that physics is incomplete, and our current model of neurons extends to the lowest levels of known physics, therefore there may be un
22.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
As stated in my other reply: "Human consciousness extends far beyond our current understanding. I am referring to the full extent of the capabilities of the human mind, not some isolated aspects of it." Computers have not supersed
23.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
We actually do have reason to believe that, since our current understanding of consciousness is very incomplete. Human consciousness extends far beyond our current understanding. I am referring to the full extent of the capabilities of the
24.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
But there is. We have fundamental research into whether physics is computable. We also have fundamental research on the physical structure of human consciousness/intelligence. So first we need to discover the physical model of human in
25.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
Yes there is doubt. Can you say for sure that we have a complete model of all physics, and that all physics can be represented computationally? We're still discovering new features of neurons at the quantum level. Who knows how far dow
26.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
No shit. Cheers for pointing that out for us.
27.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
An investment with no guarantee that the employee will stay to provide a return.
28.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
And those who do, have a competitive edge over you. It's an investment in yourself that qualifies you to leave and find a better paying job.
29.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
^ This is the way. Learn how to sell it or hide it from those HR parasites.
30.
▲
by
randomidiot666
7y ago
Reactivate it and edit your profile to make it blank. You can delete your work history but still keep your contact list.
More ›