random5634

10 ms·

1.
by random5634 5y ago
The person responding at a big corporation is often unable to, for practical purposes as a result of policies other than in exceptional circumstances. When you write in and ask them, please steal a million dollars and give it to me, while t
2.
by random5634 5y ago
You would be lying - and people will call you out on this, because they will find out that you have in fact issued refunds for products with expired warranties.
3.
by random5634 5y ago
12 meters would have been "deep" where I was :) I called them "disco" dives. Dive down a bit, show them some lights and some fish turn around a few times and back up. A play on the discovery label. But yeah, the grumpy &
4.
by random5634 5y ago
Yes - they ship open source and are generally more comfortable with open source licensing because they have much more experience with it. Expecting an entertainment industry org (which were specially attacked in latest version of GPL around
5.
by random5634 5y ago
The problem dive locations have is a lot of people a) overstate experience or what they remember, b) are unfamiliar or have not tested equip they will be diving with and c) equip is not familiar to operator if they bring their stuff. People
6.
by random5634 5y ago
Plenty of resorts and other destinations offer resort and discovery diving. You do need be 10 years old, but no prior experience needed, after some basics some places let you do 1-2 open water dives in the same day! All equip is provided. Y
7.
by random5634 5y ago
Good lord. Straight white could simply meant mostly white or mostly straight and white
8.
by random5634 5y ago
Dude - let me make this super simple. These rendering pipelines import the SDKs and APIs they connect with. The pipelines have tons have high value custom code. Under the GPL, they have to be open sourced if they use blender - this is 101 s
9.
by random5634 5y ago
They don’t want to open source the tools and programs they develop as part of their pipelines that tie into GPl or each other - GPl is viral and a library import triggers it. In terms of the tivoization / drm provisions - the GPL is vi
10.
by random5634 5y ago
The work around folks use is to claim just new stuff is agpl and skip contribs sign off. After stuff is mixed gets harder to pull apart. AWS just had to go through that exercise with elastic search
11.
by random5634 5y ago
If you import a GPL library into your plugin your plug-in / add on is now GPL. They don’t want that. GPL has what is called anti-tivoisation / DRM. This license was designed to specifically target the entertainment industry. Even
12.
by random5634 5y ago
As long as it’s actual production of limitless power in 30 - half the time these things are r&d stuff. 20 years to limitless power in production is great.
13.
by random5634 5y ago
Current version of GPL is an absolute no go, especially if you need to import an api / sdk style interface into your extensions and tooling - the GPL is viral. You import a GPL library to interface and your stuff is now GPl. and latest
14.
by random5634 5y ago
Current version of GPL is an absolute no go for many larger places - even Ubuntu ended up dropping it for parts of stack - risks are way too high
15.
by random5634 5y ago
The current version of GPL is 100% toxic at many places I know of - this is not overly conservative lawyers - you have all sorts of rules around releasing your encryption keys - secure boot chains etc - it’s a no go and viral
16.
by random5634 5y ago
Except of course the corporate folks who are licensing under AGPL who can and do then take contributors code and make available a commercial version that no one else is allowed to make available. AGPL is a poison pill license that creates a
17.
by random5634 5y ago
You realize Apple is designing against more advanced nodes than intel - and from where I stand intel has nothing competitive in small form factors
18.
by random5634 5y ago
I’m on ipv6 at home and aws is finally pretty good on IPv6 for me - security groups / vpc/ instances - is a very nice feeling
19.
by random5634 5y ago
Yeah - no question this should be fixed and it is a bit annoying that it hasn't been.
20.
by random5634 5y ago
Thanks for this, very helpful. Could they have submitted patches to fix the problems based on same tooling or was that not possible (I am not close to kernel development flow)?
21.
by random5634 5y ago
I don't disagree.
22.
by random5634 5y ago
Or just grab the phone out of your hand - most people take their phones out of their pocket all the time even on the street. I used to ride a bus and they would grab phones and jump off just as bus would leave a stop. You can actually often
23.
by random5634 5y ago
The remote RCE issues Apple has had are critical vulnerabilities. Saudi Arabi doesn't like you, they exploit remotely (maybe not even knowing who you are at all yet) to get your data / your contact lists and social graph etc - and
24.
by random5634 5y ago
Not that many users expect to sit next to an attacker running this system AND be sharing something. No question should be fixed - but compared to the rce s Apple has had (which do get fixed quickly) this is relatively lower risk
25.
by random5634 5y ago
For most people this is not a big issue
26.
by random5634 5y ago
This only is a risk when you open the share pane close to your attacker. Your email and phone number may be less secret than these folks claim . But aside from this overhype interesting work.
27.
by random5634 5y ago
How does something like this get through IRB - I always felt IRB was over the top - and then they approve something like this? UMN looks pretty shoddy - the response from the researcher saying these were automated by a tool looks like a pot
28.
by random5634 5y ago
And that is why spacex is doing so well. Europe, Russia and old US space contractors said same thing about falcon - and here we are
29.
by random5634 5y ago
100% of signal scrapped - ugh
30.
by random5634 5y ago
Big Tesla fan - but more data will be good for sure

More ›