ramblerouser

6 ms·

1.
by ramblerouser 7y ago
They do. Here is Richard Spencer mocking white nationalism: http://doesnoonehavevision.blogspot.com/2018/10/wanna-be-sit...
2.
by ramblerouser 7y ago
Have you ever asked a black person if being proud of being black was black supremacy?
3.
by ramblerouser 7y ago
Good point there most certainly is. And Facebook recognizes that: >Going forward, while people will still be able to demonstrate pride in their ethnic heritage, we will not tolerate praise or support for white nationalism and separatism.
4.
by ramblerouser 7y ago
So chinese people who are proud of their heritage and promote it can be discriminated against because being proud of your race is just a view one can hold?
5.
by ramblerouser 7y ago
This is an excellent point ablut collusion. The Alex Jones debacles proves conclusively the media giants act in concert to censor political dissonants.
6.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
A distinction without a difference.
7.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
To be fair, it would be more like 40% of cars failing after 50,000 miles instead of 150,000
8.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Bill Clinton was tougher on immigration than Donald Trump is. The Left made it a partisan issue, not the right. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RzlviQH4FhQ https://www.fairus.org/issue/legal-immigration&#
9.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Pretending that your position is the center, and everyone who disagrees with you is an extremist doesnt work very well. The right doesnt oppose clean air, it opposes giving Al Gore's carbon credit company a blank check. The right (in t
10.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
>Everyone has something to provide, on many different levels.you are failing to see that, and that is your problem. Totally false. Some prople are really bad at their jobs and gang up with other unproductive people to rag on those who ar
11.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Does anyone hve a link to the actual study, or know where his list of exercises cones from?
12.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
A poor person's car takes up the same number of parking spaces as a rich person's car, and a rich person has already paid a huge amount of their income to the poor person in the form of income taxes and welfare.
13.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
People are risk averse. The maximum sentences exist to scare people into irrationally pleading guilty when they are innocent. Federal maximum sentences are out of line with state sentencing because the federal government is less local and l
14.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
In principle I agree with you. In practice however, the FBI just uses this to harrass people. Look at what happened to Marth Stewart. She was totally innocent, did not say anything factually incorrect, but the feds thought she exagerated in
15.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Or maybe puts on tin foil hat they know exactly what happened to him.
16.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
This is totally incorrect. The high conviction rate is a result of extremely high maximum sentences. People who are 100% innocent often plead guilty after being threatened with a 30-year prison sentence that would be only 1 or 2 years under
17.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Democrats dont want to stop visa overstays either (they want to abolish ICE), so how is that an argument against the wall?
18.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Yes.
19.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
If performance worsens over time, would you see it as evidence that women are just less interested in certain jobs?
20.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
They don't exist because China has protectionist policies that give them an advantage and the US elites abolished most of its tarrifs in the 80's and 90's. they could easily come back but the new york times doesn't want
21.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
This article is anti-trump pro-globalist propaganda. The lack of real arguements demonstrates that. This is meant to demoralize Americans and make them feel helpless and dependent on a global free trade regime that has decimated the working
22.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Some percent of the time the answer will be yes, and the loss is the difference in price, probably a lot more than $100. It is not unreasonable given no other information to assess the loss at $100, as the report being criticized does. If c
23.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Great question. >“Displaced”? So let me get this right. If my wife buys a Coach handbag for $100, and it’s a counterfeit from China, and she enjoys the handbag, then the “cost” to America is $100? I’m guessing that no actual economists
24.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
When the elites in your country are so hell bent on the repression of the people they rule over, that popular political candidates are cut off from the banking system and have to borrow money from banks in other countries, that should make
25.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
The fact that those countries were colonies is not why the elites in France and the West more broadly are pushing for immigration. I googled "degaul algeria immigration". https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/quotes
26.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Thanks for the insight. I will look into that law more. It doesnt excuse the political process that has kept it on the books though.
27.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Yes. A $100 counterfeit handbag costs American companies at least $100 in lost profits, possibly a lot more if she would have bought a $500 genuine handbag instead. It's interesting to see that there are enough chinese people working i
28.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Ahh the old "legacy of empire" justification for mass immigration. The great French WWII leader Charles DuGaul gave up colonial posession of Algeria specifically to prevent migration to France . The cheap labor addicts in the Eur
29.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
The ease with which China can disrupt our supply chain (in the short term) is precisely the point. Their theft of millitary and comercial secrets is another. China requires american companies selling or manufacturing in china to divulge se
30.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Would Marie Le Pen have done any of the things Macron did to damage the livelihoods of the French people? No. Because Macron is a Neo-Liberal puppet and Le Pen is not. The leaders you seek are glaring you in the face, but you reject them be

More ›