rage4774

7 ms·

1.
by rage4774 1y ago
The problem with these kind of experiments and „determinations“ really is that we expect nowadays to be „all-knowing“. It shows the -at this point of time- most plausible route. Valid. But does it help without any sociological perspectives?
2.
by rage4774 1y ago
I totally agree with you. On the other hand the theory behind it -to combine image recognition to predict the outcome based on specific physical impacts- does sound intriguing and like a somewhat newer idea. But besides that, you‘re totally
3.
Show HN: I made a Markdown summariser for obsidian (and Markdown in general)(github.com)
4 points by rage4774 1y ago|0 comments
4.
by rage4774 1y ago
That’s a pretty dark perspective but it would imply that those executives are some kind of evil geniuses that grasp the extent of this situation. I personally try to count this kind of behavior on the statistics one of the ignobels present:
5.
by rage4774 1y ago
I couldn’t agree more, thanks for answering! Anecdotally I’ve witnessed people using and talking big about ML/ LLM‘s while being in shock when learning about the fact that there are fundamentally basic statistical concepts behind those
6.
by rage4774 1y ago
Interestingly enough, I also was wondering if I could improve my efficiency by condensing written text. The idea would be to remove the usual padding or „slop“ you have within most of the modern web environment. Wouldn’t you loose a bit of
7.
by rage4774 1y ago
But do you use it now to help you code and if yes, how? The negative effects of relying to heavily on AI while coding are greatly discussed, hence I am wondering what a „good“ use case would be.
8.
by rage4774 1y ago
I appreciate the feedback. I was not trying to prove I’m human. It was rather the case of trying to get the idea out as long as it’s fresh. Being a non-native English speaker didn’t help I presume.
9.
AI Devs are the new "Campfire Guitarist"(funkaey.com)
6 points by rage4774 1y ago|12 comments
10.
by rage4774 1y ago
And slower, if we‘re honest, since they never solve issues they intend to solve 100% and human attention is still needed (which is good)
11.
by rage4774 1y ago
Boring or the most simple solution? Okkam’s Razor e.g. and on top of that I feel like problems are nowadays not looked anymore at something to be solved and forgotten but a quest? But I get your point!
12.
by rage4774 1y ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20250328001502/https://www.forbe...
13.
Fungus found in Chernobyl might process radiation and act as a shield (2024)(forbes.com)
5 points by rage4774 1y ago|2 comments
14.
by rage4774 1y ago
You ask for a friend, to „just look at it“?
15.
by rage4774 1y ago
https://archive.is/2025.03.28-005050/https://www.theguardian...
16.
by rage4774 1y ago
I was playing with the idea about setting up something like this!
17.
by rage4774 1y ago
Aren‘t you confusing the external perception? Wouldn’t somebody assertive seem like „an asshole“ to somebody else if the perspective don’t align 100%?