rafaelmdec

6 ms·

1.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
I'm not gonna say don't do it. By all means, go ahead and try it out. My only advice is: don't get married to the solution. Or, in wiser words, fall in love with the problem, not the solution (I think Ury Levine coined that o
2.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
OP is not a bot. I can tell you that for sure. To your point, and I see that it is a recurring opinion around here. I like the way you think, yet I find it difficult to see how one such movement would emerge. Most likely from the Open Sourc
3.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
Good stuff, tks
4.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
Tks for sharing your views on this
5.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
Yeah. I see that working. But one thing is seeing the content and another thing is interacting with the UI to accomplish an office task, for instance.
6.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
You cannot be seriously thinking that the future lies in memorizing commands and typing words one stroke at a time on a keyboard. We are already seeing traditional coding evaporate overnight, let alone have people memorize commands and type
7.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
Who said people want to wear goggles? I mean, seriously, what on earth is Apple Vision Pro?? Voice is natural, it is fluid, it conveys emotion, intent. You cannot seriously be comparing metaverse immersion BS with voice commanded devices.
8.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
Please elaborate. How does this resonate with the average user who doesn't know anything about infosec.
9.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
Yup. Many like tens of thousands out of billions. Makes sense.
10.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
Ok
11.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
And, BTW, according to Henry Ford, if he listened to his customers, he would have gone after faster horses. Most people don't see innovation until it is materialized in front of them.
12.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
I think that, for the first time in tech history, we have the tools to step away from ineffective app installs and menu cluttering and memorization and that is a rather big thing. If you don't agree, take a step back and tell me how ma
13.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
I have difficulty to see that, as it requires proper packaging and distribution for mainstream adoption. Plus the average user doesn't care about data sovereignty, what they care about is UX and dopamine. How many users you know of tha
14.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
I see it as a rather logical step with the advances in voice first AI wearables. Think about it. Not everyone wants to be recorded as a bystander. Privacy will be an issue. The technology for audio signature already exists and works fine. I
15.
Ask HN: The Next Big OS Leap
4 points by rafaelmdec 8mo ago|30 comments
16.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
Well, I am glad that we both respect the amount of damage that can be avoided if you take into account the risks involved in handing over full autonomy to these agents. In the meantime, Moltbook comes along and all of a sudden these agents
17.
Ask HN: Does Clawdbot/Moltbot pose AI self-replication concerns?
1 points by rafaelmdec 8mo ago|2 comments
18.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
Thank you for the link and the compliment.
19.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
...or even how fast technology is evolving in this field.
20.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
Have you ever heard of burglars or angry girlfriends/boyfriends?
21.
by rafaelmdec 8mo ago
Why, may I ask? Once someone broke into my house and stole a laptop and an external drive. It may happen.
22.
Is Privacy an Illusion?
2 points by rafaelmdec 8mo ago|5 comments
23.
Kicked from AI Memory(thoughts.jock.pl)
1 points by rafaelmdec 8mo ago|0 comments
24.
AI-Generated Content Sucks(realizeai.substack.com)
3 points by rafaelmdec 8mo ago|0 comments
25.
The future of AI is voice(realizeai.substack.com)
1 points by rafaelmdec 8mo ago|0 comments
26.
Parsing Errors and Hidden Talent(realizeai.substack.com)
2 points by rafaelmdec 8mo ago|0 comments
27.
Generative AI and the end of permanent car paint(realizeai.substack.com)
1 points by rafaelmdec 8mo ago|0 comments