rad-b

7 ms·

1.
by rad-b 13d ago
Very valid point, shame it’s buried so deep in the comments’ tree.
2.
by rad-b 14d ago
“People could only see the listing and request to book the property during a 20-minute window” This seems like a much smaller problem than the title would suggest. I agree Booking fraud is worth tightening but hardly anu automate system wou
3.
by rad-b 20d ago
It seems to me you underestimate the challenges of getting the money from such crypto scheme. A murderer would have to prove to the pot owner that they are, in fact, the real murderer and not someone pretending to be one to get the money. H
4.
by rad-b 23d ago
Agreed, a dorm-like setup with amenities in the middle might work. It’s a whole different economic model and pitch to potential buyers/renters, but it could work.
5.
by rad-b 24d ago
The key problem with adapting offices into apartments is the lack of natural light in office floor plans. You have a glass skyscraper that has a huge floor surface, but no way to deliver light in the middle of the building. So even if conve
6.
by rad-b 1mo ago
Do you use summarize email function in gmail or outlook? Do you use rewrite paragraphs feature in word or google docs? Do you know anyone who wants these features? That’s what I’m talking about, not AI use in general.
7.
by rad-b 1mo ago
I’m not saying nobody wants to use AI, or AI coding and desktop apps. I’m using that daily as many others here are too. The article refers to different AI features within other apps (e.g. search overviews in google, summarize email, summari
8.
by rad-b 1mo ago
Such a cool guide to such a bizarre problem we live in… Companies forcing features that nobody wants, but that are also expensive to operate and cost real money to run? Market can definitely stay irrational for long.
9.
by rad-b 1mo ago
I see the regulators only regulated that first-party and third-party apps be treated equally, and didn’t specify how. It’s a bummer (albeit an expected one) to see Apple reducing the burden for third-party publishers to collect personal dat
10.
by rad-b 1mo ago
Great read and interesting analysis! I’m less charitable toward Anthropic supposedly not distilling ChatGPT for training purposes. Maybe not today, but during the GPT-4 era when Anthropic was the underdog - I can see it happen. Packaged alo
11.
by rad-b 1mo ago
Fun game! Enjoyed the panicked looking for the best available seat.
12.
by rad-b 1mo ago
Not the OP, but I understand the sentiment they’re trying to convey. I will frequently work with AI to get done something that is not in my immediate area of expertise. And this kind of speak constantly happens, where you can feel it trying
13.
by rad-b 2mo ago
How did you decide on Pi over Opencode? What you see as the “edge” Pi has?
14.
by rad-b 2mo ago
It seems to be only against ToS; the problem, however, is that “distillation” involves intent. Anthropic seems to be calling for ban on distillation because they cannot reliably identify who does it - if they could, they would’ve just banne
15.
by rad-b 2mo ago
Good idea, and unfortunately one of those that would work only while it’s not popular. If it turns out to be good enough to become popular, here comes the enforcement.
16.
by rad-b 2mo ago
So refreshing to see such and interesting innovation in the hardware space! Curious as to what’s the business play here, as at $1400 a piece these don’t seem like mass-market devices. And the high-end market is even more constrained with th
17.
by rad-b 2mo ago
Great comparison! We only have to take into account that applying lipstick well bears no consequences, but applying it poorly (i. e. new model tanking the benchmark) could amount to potentially losses of billions of dollars for the pig-bree
18.
by rad-b 2mo ago
A genuinely interesting read, thanks for sharing. Feels like GTM is always the hard part, regardless of how well you solve the technical piece. You can have the best solution in the world and no one to sell it to.
19.
by rad-b 2mo ago
That might seem like obvious pivots in hindsight , but there’s no way to make such easy predictions going forward. “Jensen’s job is to just be one step ahead of the market” — how is that a “just”? That’s arguably one of the most difficult t
20.
by rad-b 2mo ago
Fully agree, that’s how I see most of my less technical coworkers reason about using AI. “Is there a Claude skill for that?” is a question I hear multiple times a week. I see a lot of comments (incl 2 sibling comments) are always discussing
21.
by rad-b 3mo ago
Unfortunately this seems quite plausible from today’s POV. As the old saying goes if you don’t want to be the product, you’ll have to pay for it. And I see only a silver of people being rich enough to afford and educated enough to care fo
22.
by rad-b 4mo ago
Working in selection, I can say it’s more nuanced than that. Any measurement can be used as long as it is relevant to the business and related to performance. For example, you’re fine to reject people based on height if you’re hiring basket
23.
by rad-b 4mo ago
A greatly written article! Really a masterclass of (1) getting the point across and (2) being emotionally engaging all the while not requiring me to have a PhD in pharmacology to understand it.
24.
by rad-b 5mo ago
Seems interesting but testing myself only yields my results? How would I compare the result to a frontier model, that part seems to be missing? Also, the tests seem to be heavily skewed in favor of what LLMs are good at.
25.
by rad-b 5mo ago
Sounds promising. How do you find ideal customers? That's usually the hard part.