ra1n85

7 ms·

1.
by ra1n85 6y ago
[edit] Retracting my unnecessary jab around the moderator's comments being modified several times and their moderation leaving a lot to be desired. The latter was rude and uncalled for.
2.
by ra1n85 6y ago
It's clearly tongue in cheek, how can you not see that? I mean there are joke tags!
3.
by ra1n85 6y ago
Twitch and Reddit enacted bans simultaneously: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/29/reddit-bans-pro-tru... https://www.engadget.com/twitch-suspends-donald-trump-accoun... Seems odd f
4.
by ra1n85 6y ago
That shouldn't be significant unless: 1. There is a significant serialization/deserialization delay, which I don't think will be the based on my naive understanding of the tech 2. Buffering in time periods even relevant to di
5.
by ra1n85 6y ago
What did you experience the last time significant inflation occurred? Did you observe any early indicators then on that you're looking out for now?
6.
by ra1n85 6y ago
Two things: 1. The consequences of having millions of unemployed people with bills to pay and no income are too much for a nation, let alone politicians in an election year. My bet is that the payments will be extended or replaced with som
7.
by ra1n85 6y ago
Yes, I would imagine so. HK seemed to be the only conduit through which trade with the west could flow smoothly. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
8.
by ra1n85 6y ago
It's wreak. And you're probably right. Hong Kong's status made it home to a lot of the financial engineering of commerce between China and the west. With it losing its status, I think a lot of the financial machinery in HK
9.
by ra1n85 6y ago
This is an amazingly ignorant viewpoint, and I'd bet the farmers in Vietnam of the 1960's and Afghanistan of the 2000's would likely care to differ. Insurgencies undermine the advantages of expensive weaponry. And if we&#x27
10.
by ra1n85 6y ago
This, sadly, is so accurate. That, or the fact that as difficulty levels increase, the game just gives the AI opponents crude modifiers - they don't get smarter, they just get cheat codes.
11.
by ra1n85 6y ago
>It's entirely possible to say "we need to work harder, or take a risk, or be bold" while understanding where your colleagues are at in terms of what they need to do that, or what has or hasn't been communicated to th
12.
by ra1n85 6y ago
Yep, though it’s not commercially available quite yet. Likely only shipping samples to switch manufacturers at this time.
13.
by ra1n85 6y ago
Yeah, it's an interesting approach. They're basically allowing you to define packet processing with P4 on their Tofino family of chipsets: https://p4.org/ That said, there's only so much you can do in a chip
14.
by ra1n85 6y ago
Sorry, what's not accurate here?
15.
by ra1n85 6y ago
For many years, the most popular routing platforms (i.e., boxes built by Cisco) performed IP packet forwarding and management functions on the same processor (often a RISC architecture). In cases where packet rate was high, it was possible
16.
by ra1n85 6y ago
Yes, correct, or through an open sauce repository
17.
by ra1n85 6y ago
Can confirm - only native restaurant sauces are supported. Special sauces must be sourced from your own internal sources.
18.
by ra1n85 6y ago
>Our national propaganda is so strong, that rather than workers asking "why do I have to go to work every day just to pay rent to the bank?" This is not fair to people that have spent their lifetimes building businesses and are
19.
by ra1n85 6y ago
"Google is trying retail now?" was my first thought. "For how long?" was my second thought.
20.
by ra1n85 6y ago
Most don't have "multiple offers from FAANGS" and they are operating from an extremely poor bargaining position. And how did you read that comment and come away with immigrants are to blame?
21.
by ra1n85 7y ago
It's a DNS resolver that runs on the hypervisor hosting every instance.
22.
by ra1n85 7y ago
Your link gives access denied.
23.
by ra1n85 7y ago
1500 bytes is the MTU of IP, in most cases. It often excludes the Ethernet header, which is 14 bytes excluding the FCS, preamble, IFG, and any VLANs. If have a 1500 byte MTU for IP, then we need at least a 1514 byte MTU for IP + Ethernet.
24.
by ra1n85 7y ago
>Vision, goals, key results, what we are allowed to do and not do, are clear. Likely written down, understood, repeated frequently, taught to new members of a team. On the nose. Amazed by how many leaders that I've worked under that
25.
by ra1n85 7y ago
Nope, I'm sorry you're not quite getting it here. Minimum Ethernet frame is 84B on the wire - it's simple enough from there.
26.
by ra1n85 7y ago
Yes. The point of discussion here is that the Linux kernel struggles to do line rate 10Gbps. This was misinterpreted as "the Linux kernel struggles to do 10Gbps".
27.
by ra1n85 7y ago
It implies it. Ethernet at 84B per frame is the smallest you can go, thus the line rate - some examples: https://events19.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017... https://www.redhat.com/en&#
28.
by ra1n85 7y ago
16 iperf threads...sending at what packet size? Do you understand the notion of line rate? 85Gbps at 1500B is only 7MPPS, which is half of 10Gbps at line rate.
29.
by ra1n85 7y ago
You're saying you can forward 100Gbps at line rate (148MPPS) through a stock kernel?
30.
by ra1n85 7y ago
What if you have no application and you're purely forwarding traffic? That's what I'm measuring here (and that's actually typically faster than passing packets up to user space apps to consume through syscalls). 25G lin

More ›