Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
qwery
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
qwery
22d ago
I'm a little bit surprised to see someone taking such grand & absolute claims so seriously. I guess I don't, generally. Actually thinking about it, it's not that I treat them as unserious, it's more like I read it as
2.
▲
by
qwery
26d ago
Sounds like the right move. I can only hope that the rest of us lap dogs see the (common) sense. The USA is increasingly the source of economic and military destabliisation in the world and it's getting real hard to justify being the b
3.
▲
by
qwery
1mo ago
Sorry to be a bore [that's a firearms joke], but -- while I encourage everyone and their family to experiment with building such devices, with safety in mind of course, it is a lot of fun -- please don't dispose of your old batter
4.
▲
by
qwery
1mo ago
> caused actual damage to humans You might need to qualify that a bit harder or someone could quite easily point out that all of these worthless shitdribblers cause actual damage to humans. They all lie, they all continue to claim that t
5.
▲
by
qwery
1mo ago
> My comment had nothing to do with "git gud" Fair enough, I applied that lens to it on my own. Allow me to elaborate on my earlier comment and reply to this one here: A ton of it? No, I don't see that. It's probabl
6.
▲
by
qwery
1mo ago
The Alyx example is interesting, because I see that system as being designed to avoid breaking immersion. Specifically, to avoid entering an "unwinnable" state i.e. where the player restarts from a save/checkpoint. I do under
7.
▲
by
qwery
1mo ago
"actual players" as opposed to other people who just, what? "use" the game? Sorry, but it's hard to take this comment seriously when it reeks of "git gud". So I'll just point out that a lot of people
8.
▲
by
qwery
1mo ago
I'm not sure that that's even worth considering, seeing as Facebook just lets scammers pay to list ads that are disguised (by Facebook) as actual posts.
9.
▲
by
qwery
1mo ago
It's hardly a surprise to see a behemoth like Oracle doing this. Accepting LLM contributions can only be a liability, particularly for such a mature, stable project. Even if you see that liability as small or insignificant, it's n
10.
▲
by
qwery
1mo ago
I agree with this for the most part. I just want to add that programmers have only relatively recently become so abundant (i.e. replaceable) that they have so little say in how software should be built. Programmers are still the experts in
11.
▲
by
qwery
1mo ago
> This post reads off as AI slop. You said it, I see it. I completely disagree. I think this post has emdashes in the first paragraphs and that most of the people saying that it was generated didn't go any further than that. Where i
12.
▲
by
qwery
2mo ago
Your argument seems to be that some bits of tree doesn't constitute what we would usually call a "device", and that's fair enough really. I called that out myself in the same comment, so I guess you picked up what I was
13.
▲
by
qwery
2mo ago
I'm sure the team are having a rough time with all this, but I don't understand the path you followed to go from the maintainers have not taken this action until now to "This doesn't speak well to the security headspa
14.
▲
by
qwery
2mo ago
I don't know what more I can say to convince you that I'm not trying to put down the technology. I'm interested in it, that's why I think it's a shame to curse it with a used-car salesman marketing name. As for wood
15.
▲
by
qwery
2mo ago
Say caveman, cavemen ... unheard[0] cavewoman. No good. Bad. When Sabrewulf[1] come, some fight, some run ... some run in cave. No good. Bad. Token cost. Seem smart less token. But already discount. No profit. Use less token? Price go up. W
16.
▲
by
qwery
2mo ago
> Some patterns are very specific to the interactions inherent to the nature of AI as a technology. For example: streaming text. This is a pattern made for and refined by chat interfaces, so it may not have tons of utility for reuse acro
17.
▲
by
qwery
2mo ago
Wood is a solid-state battery. The term has obviously been selected because of how revolutionary solid-state electronic devices were/are. And it's not like they selected it after a revolutionary energy storage device was introdu
18.
▲
by
qwery
2mo ago
If you know a bit about electronics, you might be a bit surprised by the term 'solid-state battery'. It's a poor analogue to the more common usage of solid-state with semiconductors, integrated circuits, etc. -- a "solid
19.
▲
by
qwery
2mo ago
Microservices are service/s that are significantly smaller than the service you're comparing them to. That's an obvious and perhaps unhelpful definition, let's contrast it with ... "Microservices" is [0] a tec
20.
▲
by
qwery
2mo ago
Compared to how much they want to pay. This is always what 'overpriced' means, as far as I know. The seller's costs/profits/margins aren't a concern for the buyer.
21.
▲
by
qwery
2mo ago
The facts as presented from the Bun side show a lack of technical merit for the rewrite. This shouldn't be surprising, because rewrites are bad engineering , in most cases. The Bun project was started in Zig by someone with a lack of
22.
▲
by
qwery
2mo ago
The drawing including a couple of anthropomorphised animal characters hardly seems surprising or even noteworthy. The project/product has always had a heavy emphasis on being "fun", including its dolphin mascot/theming&#
23.
▲
by
qwery
3mo ago
PhysX itself (assuming Unity still uses PhysX, but any major physics engine will be the same) is unlikely to be your problem, although it is possible that Unity compiles it with undesirable optimisations, or some aggressive multithreading s
24.
▲
by
qwery
3mo ago
> I would also not be surprised if the [staff] on this game did not get a share of that $500M pie That's almost certainly the case, yes. Anything like royalties / residuals is pretty much unheard of in gamedev. You do the work,
25.
▲
by
qwery
3mo ago
First they came for the [clients with specific timezones and/or bizarrely formatted dates] and I did nothing. Then they came for the [users that spell favour the good way, with a 'u' in it], etc. > why would I care about t
26.
▲
by
qwery
3mo ago
The article is really quite reasonable and calmly presented, actually. Your claim re. the intent of the fingerprinting is a guess. Normal developers are the users that aren't taking steps to avoid being flagged by this system. The soft
27.
▲
by
qwery
3mo ago
I think they were asking about the Chinese companies/programmers being "legally prohibtied" from accessing Anthropic's product.
28.
▲
by
qwery
3mo ago
Even if you think Fender is solely responsible for the design, which is frankly ridiculous, the bloody thing's been around forever and now they're suing? Having a court stop actual counterfeits -- sure, nobody has a problem with t
29.
▲
by
qwery
3mo ago
Labelling (all?) American (Allied?) personnel as "antifa" or even "anti-fascist" is an interesting move. The article doesn't seem to demonstrate what you suggest it does nor does it seem particularly relevant in gen
30.
▲
by
qwery
3mo ago
> "out of bounds" is a nice way of putting it. This I agree with. > it was knowingly concealing evidence The article does not misrepresent this. The issue being raised is about how they were tried/convicted/sentenc
More ›