quotemstr

5 ms·

1.
by quotemstr 3d ago
Shame that you can't then link /proc/self/fd/N to a different node in the filesystem namespace. That'd be neat and symmetric.
2.
by quotemstr 4d ago
What are you going on about? Why shouldn't there be some temporary authorization prompt for clipboard access? You could even wire it up to control-V somehow such that the same keystroke would grant temporary access and communicate a pa
3.
by quotemstr 4d ago
No.
4.
by quotemstr 6d ago
The wheel of fashion turns once more.
5.
by quotemstr 7d ago
I don't think GitHub or any other private party gets to decide what attaches to the perjury clause. A contract can impose liabilities, but it can't create a crime out of thin air.
6.
by quotemstr 7d ago
The perjury part of the DMCA doesn't do what you (and most people) think. It attaches only to the DMCA claimant's authority to act on behalf of the copyright he's alleging is being infringed. It does not attach to the ver
7.
by quotemstr 8d ago
You don't have to quantize all layers and all dimensions uniformly, FWIW
8.
by quotemstr 8d ago
This is going to get about 0% uptake. People's preferences, as revealed by their behavior, align with the algorithmic feeds. That's the whole point of an algorithmic feed.
9.
by quotemstr 10d ago
I don't know what all that's about, but the day-to-day experience is that you can find a wide range of opinions on X and a much narrower range on alternatives. I don't think a lot of people who aren't already on these al
10.
by quotemstr 10d ago
You're not going to get many volunteers to move from a free-speech platform to a censored one. Everyone who wants the censorship is already on BlueSky or Mastodon. Part of sharing a society with people is being okay with their being ab
11.
by quotemstr 10d ago
We could never rely on scratchpad to reflect true model deliberatons.
12.
by quotemstr 10d ago
Keep in mind that LessWrong a community that 1) ostensibly wants to slow down AI so we can prepare for it, and 2) in actuality, wants to make the Bay Area EA community a kind of guild that controls everyone's use of AI. Take anything t
13.
by quotemstr 10d ago
It is the real thing. Not "almost". The actual thing. If you want to forestall accidental heap policy, make a storage policy that prohibits it.
14.
by quotemstr 10d ago
Ah. Dyno ( https://github.com/ldionne/dyno ) is good at this stuff. If you have types Base, Child1, Child2, you can just return a Dyno object that can be any of these, expressed as a tagged union and not a Box-equivale
15.
by quotemstr 10d ago
"We"? Yeah, okay, Your Highness. As for the content: the law says what it says. Where in the constitution of the United States of America and its amendments does it say that a state government must be truthful about public health
16.
by quotemstr 10d ago
Where is the constitution does it say the state can't do that?
17.
by quotemstr 11d ago
What does your explanation have to do with the fact that C++ can express by-value returns of complex objects?
18.
by quotemstr 11d ago
My question stands.
19.
by quotemstr 11d ago
Has anyone actually been charged and convicted for disclosing knowledge of a vulnerability in exchange for money with no further collusion to commit a crime?
20.
by quotemstr 12d ago
No, it wouldn't.
21.
by quotemstr 12d ago
Has anyone actually been convicted of abetting a crime by selling a vulnerability, by itself, not conspiring with the buyer to commit a crime using said vulnerability? Not as far as I can see. It would be absurd to jail someone for accurate
22.
by quotemstr 12d ago
> Blackhat markets will always be able to pay better. ... than Google? > Selling to Google though you aren't chancing jail time. Why would you go to jail for selling a vulnerability? It's free speech.
23.
by quotemstr 12d ago
You let the market decide. Google could purchase the bugs on the same market blackhats do.
24.
by quotemstr 12d ago
The whole AI-O-Sphere is allergic to using sandboxes that are actually robust
25.
by quotemstr 13d ago
What makes you think this task won't fall quickly too?
26.
by quotemstr 13d ago
5) Otherwise-sober people on X will say "oh my god i was a doubter before but now it's real omg" before the new model smell wears off and they realize the new thing is stupid in ways models have been generally stupid 6) accus
27.
by quotemstr 13d ago
> no easy way to tell a reserved 2LD (open for 3LD registrations only) apart from a normal 2LD on .name And that's one reason why the public-ness of a hierarchy level belongs on a DNS record on that level and not some separately-d
28.
by quotemstr 13d ago
It's a good metaphor and I refuse to let AI ruin it for me.
29.
by quotemstr 15d ago
What makes you think Rust is automatically better? (Also, "Rust or native" is a strange dichotomy. What's not native about Rust?)
30.
by quotemstr 15d ago
There's no security benefit to doing this versus demand-downloading hashed-locked components on need.

More ›