Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
quinndiggity
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
"An analogy: there are open source versions of Dropbox for users that don't trust Dropbox with their files (NextCloud, ownCloud, etc.), however this comes with the friction of having to host your own solution. We are more like Dro
2.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
If ycombinator and their mods are more concerned with the promotion of one of their own investments, over discussion of its merits and feedback from the people who _would_ be the ones adopting and promoting it in their own companies if it i
3.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
To be brutally honest (as if not already), Doppler makes me wonder why not simply focus on building on-top of open solutions like Vault. Considering there is no on-prem version of Doppler, you could essentially run Vault behind the scenes a
4.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
Thank you for acknowledging the need for trust, self-hosting + auditability. However, please stop trying to contrast yourself with these analogies. Owncloud and Nextcloud both have hosted OR on-prem versions https://owncloud.com&
5.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
Understood, and yes my comment was harsh, perhaps a bit much so However `Enterprise tools like HashiCorp Vault and AWS Parameter Store felt like we were stuck using FTP instead of Dropbox!` is in itself bashing other peoples' work, and
6.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
> I am not invalidating someone's right to privacy. You are saying that not having the choice to choose what to share is acceptable though. Privacy isn't about having something to hide, it's about having the same rights yo
7.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
with this setup, Vault will create a new database user based on the configuration you set (read-only for some services, for example), and will attach a time-to-live to those credentials; as long as the application is using them, it will ren
8.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
Wait wait wait, and this is paid and hosted too? Bleh, nooooo thanks. I'm not sending private and secret key material to a bunch of ex-Uber employees (gross on that point alone), but nevermind to ones who looked at the existing market,
9.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
It looks like this https://www.nomadproject.io/docs/integrations/vault-integrat... It's incredibly simple, and a breeze to use. ``` job "vault" { group "demo" { task "task"
10.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
I guess dynamic secrets are too "ftp" for Doppler, eh? You lost the entire audience who have actually used Vault before when you claimed it was too complex for your team to understand.. Why would I trust a company staffed with a c
11.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
I think part of the reason people are chiming in on the distinction is that a controller is comparable to a mouse for a computer; a controller requires something else for any functionality, at which point you're comparing a general com
12.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
your comment said "decks" though - the ddj1000 is _closer_ to decks, but it's still a controller. decks, you're thinking (some examples): cdj350 cdj400 cdj800 cdj850 cdj900 cdj1000 cdj2000 xdj1000 etc
13.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
this guy mixes
14.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
It's literally impossible, in case you haven't tried recently. If you don't want to send them a government issued photo ID, you can make a new account that lasts 10 minutes and then is locked on you and holds any accounts lin
15.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
Kinda absurd. You can't setup a one time email, and one time facebook if you really don't want your movement online all linked to a government issued ID. Sure you're sort of an idiot to make those assumptions, but I'm su
16.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
Yeah, I thought the same thing too, in order to give the fake like/follow some artists require before making their music available to download; took 10 minutes, my account was banned for "suspicious activity" (meaning I didn&
17.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
I agree; this is how I've understood the terms for as long as I've been aware of and used them. The lack of light = black, and light which includes literally all colours = white. When light is "blocked" from passing, bla
18.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
Has someone taken over Tavis's blog? Two posts in a row now that seem like he either just doesn't understand some concepts, or is intentionally disseminating nonsense that is pushing people in the wrong direction on things that re
19.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
Few reasons off the top of my head: - why doesn't everybody already encrypt everything to begin with? there's often a disconnect between the benefit and the ease/overhead of doing so (it's hard enough to for people to ca
20.
▲
by
quinndiggity
6y ago
Defence in depth - too often I hear "whelp, we had a tiny crack in one of our measures, so it's game over, why even try?". Imagine the scenario where service A has read-only access to the authentication db/table, whereas
21.
▲
by
quinndiggity
11y ago
Arch, finally a distro that is stable BECAUSE it's cutting edge. You're running just about the latest of everything, and you pick and choose everything you want to run. It becomes easy to try every window manager and desktop envir