quikoa

6 ms·

1.
by quikoa 3d ago
"Others do it too" is not really a counterargument when Anthropic should've stopped this. They are yelling "AI is dangerous" the loudest so the least they can do is get their own monitoring in order.
2.
by quikoa 3d ago
Are you sure you don't mean revenue? Given the enormous investments profits seem very unlikely.
3.
by quikoa 3d ago
> What is more difficult, building a military missile or the software that runs it? "If software was easier compared to building the a missile then Anthropic is in the clear or something." Is that the line of reasoning to prote
4.
by quikoa 3d ago
Quite a bit harder or even impossible to prevent software being used illegally that runs on clients than server side services no?
5.
by quikoa 4d ago
> easily outcompeting any company If it were easy they'd be doing that instead.
6.
by quikoa 4d ago
If Anthropic/OpenAI would've shown incredible results using these models then I'd be worried about this. Instead we get Codex and Claude Code, bloated and disappointing software. I'm sorry but "use them in-house, an
7.
by quikoa 4d ago
Yes and winning from Google in small claims court is definitely possible: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-i-sued-google-and-won_b_1... Edit: AI can be a great help here, ask it: - How to prepare your case for your c
8.
by quikoa 5d ago
There is no need for a copy. If another can do most of what OpenAI/Anthropic can do at a fraction of the cost (like the Chinese models) then the moat evaporates.
9.
by quikoa 6d ago
There is also a predictable relation between the input and output of a compiler w.r.t. the semantics of a programming language. Natural languages are ambiguous leaving room for the implementation to diverge that may not be obvious at first
10.
by quikoa 6d ago
There could be a large overlap between OpenAI glazers and Star Citizen dreamers.
11.
by quikoa 6d ago
Exactly, they scrape the internet without any regard for copyright and now someone is surprised it happens to them. What's next, subscribers believe they are paying customers instead of sponsored data providers?
12.
by quikoa 10d ago
So why doesn't Anthropic write a good Claude Code in Rust already? Why don't we get a Codex with the polish level of Sublime text editor? These companies have many billion dollar investments and yet their main product is a bloated
13.
by quikoa 10d ago
On the off chance that OpenAI executives are reading this. I'll totally believe AGI is here if they do this.
14.
by quikoa 13d ago
That won't even require an AGI.
15.
by quikoa 23d ago
> (at the moment) That's why. That future is uncertain. So why gamble your future on something that's popular at the moment for something that could change completely a year later?
16.
by quikoa 27d ago
A language without a large stdlib pushes this that functionality into (transitive) dependencies. I hope more language will adopt batteries included approach.
17.
by quikoa 1mo ago
It'd definitely need a solid team behind this and not just Evan Czaplicki if I were to trust a database with my data.
18.
by quikoa 1mo ago
> something dangerous like AI model developement It's very dangerous to Anthropic's bottomline!
19.
by quikoa 1mo ago
Is it this one? https://patents.google.com/patent/US20050184962A1/en > [..] and a plurality of Sensors located in the capacity Surrounding the track ball for detecting pressure directions. ... > Status Expir
20.
by quikoa 1mo ago
The question is if they'll increase prices as well.
21.
by quikoa 1mo ago
This statistic doesn't show the disproportionate effect it may have on local communities close to these AI datacenters.
22.
by quikoa 1mo ago
Well yes, first hit is free.
23.
by quikoa 1mo ago
Thanks! I know about it but really should be using it more.
24.
by quikoa 1mo ago
Given the title I thought this was just ridiculous: > I do not care about your taste. But taste is all that we have left. And then this: > If this posts has offended you, then it tells more about you than it does about me. So the auth
25.
by quikoa 1mo ago
A YouTube alternative without AI would be nice. It'd be difficult to launch and may require quite some investment before it starts paying off. YouTube can very clearly mark AI channels without banning/demonetizing them. Unfortunat
26.
by quikoa 1mo ago
Why not not show these kickass one-shots and prove how awesome AI can be?
27.
by quikoa 1mo ago
> This bizarre fixation that humans are decent at coding is a myth. I wonder where the LLMs got their training data from.
28.
by quikoa 2mo ago
Some people may continue using AI and publish books but the amount of AI slop would be dramatically lower without extrinsic motivations.
29.
by quikoa 2mo ago
What does your harness do to squeeze that value out of DS4 flash if you don't mind sharing? It'd interesting how it compares to other harnesses (even if it's a qualitative assessment instead of quantitative).
30.
by quikoa 2mo ago
To me it just looks like a marketing stunt.

More ›