quantadev

6 ms·

1.
by quantadev 1y ago
100% refers to my level of certainty, as a probability. You can think of it purely as a Quantum Mechanical Wave if that helps any.
2.
by quantadev 1y ago
> But you cannot... Prove it. Prove I cannot.
3.
by quantadev 1y ago
I think the last sentence, about Shelby and Miles, was written by a human, because it doesn't fit with the rest at all. Different style and a complete awkward shift of gears non sequitur. He probably recently saw the Amazon movie Ford
4.
by quantadev 1y ago
[flagged]
5.
by quantadev 1y ago
Yeah by "rough calculation" what I mean is that since the Fed knows the ratio of volume to bills, they might have intentionally made the box too big.
6.
by quantadev 1y ago
Counting robots is like counting circuits in a piece of electronics: It's Meaningless. However what would be interesting is if they ever have a situation where the number of humanoid robot employees outnumbers human employees. Once som
7.
by quantadev 1y ago
Yeah, there's no way they piled the cash into a square on the floor and then measured it and then had the box made based on the measurements. They had the box made FIRST based on rough calculations, being sure to over-estimate it'
8.
by quantadev 1y ago
I mean it was probably easier 250,000 years ago for primates to steal some honey, because we still had our long body hair back then I think, so that's more protection from bee stings.
9.
by quantadev 1y ago
I wonder what DeekSeek agents would do if they discovered at some future time that USA and China are in a kinetic War. Because we don't have the ability to analyze hidden motivations in model weights, it's impossible to predict, a
10.
by quantadev 1y ago
wow. I didn't know it went back that far, but it makes sense mankind discovered hives are basically a free sugar factory that long ago!!
11.
by quantadev 1y ago
I stand corrected. You found 3 more. :) And I like Praying Mantises because I think they're probably secretly alien robots. I wonder if biologists have ever taken one apart to see if they're truly biological or a machine. I'v
12.
by quantadev 1y ago
Made me realize for the first time Bees are the only insect that most people don't find disgusting. I mean we literally eat what they create: Honey. It would be fascinating to watch them build their hives.
13.
by quantadev 1y ago
Lookup "Analog Optical Computing". There was recently a breakthrough just last week where optical computing researchers were able to use photon interference effects to do mathematical operations purely in analog! That means no 0s
14.
by quantadev 1y ago
Google Gemini Prompt: "Does Rapid Evolution Happen"
15.
by quantadev 1y ago
In 25 years we'll have #GlassModels. A "chip", which is a passive device (just a complex lens) made only of glass or graphene, which can do an "AI Inference" simply by shining the "input tokens" thru it. (
16.
by quantadev 1y ago
Another concept in this sort of realm is "Assembly Theory" by Lee Cronin. He's onto the right track with his "Causality Chain" concept, but it blows my mind he hasn't bought into the idea that with entanglement
17.
by quantadev 1y ago
I still have hope for Web Components to take off in the figure. I'm a React dev so I don't "need" them, but they may end up being some kind of capability that React can secretly, quietly embed into React core as some kin
18.
by quantadev 1y ago
As a web dev you probably already know but #1 is slightly similar to `Web Components` but you're right we cannot load a web component right in the HTML where we use it. It makes sense though because if you use an Element in multiple pl
19.
by quantadev 1y ago
Templates are great until they need to be dynamic. Then you're right back to the current situation where frameworks like React are just the better way. In fact, you could call JSX a "Dynamic Templating System" and that's
20.
by quantadev 1y ago
Wow. Lots of amazing stuff in there. It's mind boggling how that stuff is not "really" doing 3D but is nonetheless a seemingly consistent rendering (i.e. 2D projection) of a true 3D shape, that could theoretically be converte
21.
by quantadev 1y ago
I dunno. My formative years were the 1970s, and I don't think anyone my age will have a genuine panic attack if denied access to their pacifier like today's kids (and adults) do.
22.
by quantadev 1y ago
> I trust my 9-yo Welp, there's your first mistake.
23.
by quantadev 1y ago
Thus the "basically" qualifier in front of "bypassing". I'm "basically bypassing" ADs simply because I never encounter them while reading my feeds.
24.
by quantadev 1y ago
yeah, I shortened it just now. I mainly wanted people to see that file format, not the links in it.
25.
by quantadev 1y ago
Definitely! Advertisers hate it, because it's a way of basically bypassing ADs. I used to have my own RSS reader doing what the OP's doing, but I finally just started using Liferea (on Linux) which I love. There's a file form
26.
by quantadev 1y ago
I think you took my post a bit too seriously. I have no kids, but I just know the topic of how to discipline children is hotly debated among the "experts" (if there are any).
27.
by quantadev 1y ago
What I wrote in that post was just the simplest chain of thoughts to point people in the right direction, sort of as an exercise to see how terse I can make it and still cover the main points. That's not the full theory. Writing down e
28.
by quantadev 1y ago
==== Conjectures on a Mechanism for Biological Memory: ==== Read each step. Don't don't jump to the end. The last part will begin to resonate with the beginning. :) * All high negentropic structures necessarily have a long causali
29.
by quantadev 1y ago
If you wanna have successful kids just make 'em solve a coding challenge on a white board for food and/or medical and dental care, whereby noncompliance or failure earns them a night out in the tent in the back yard, especially in
30.
by quantadev 1y ago
I agree with all that. Nowadays kids are so addicted to phones, the phone is like a toy (even like a baby pacifier) that they simply never outgrow even into adulthood. They can't sit at a stoplight without needing a "fix" lik

More ›