qq99

6 ms·

1.
by qq99 10mo ago
Win11, editor runs on Win11, all development happens inside WSL2 (Ubuntu) Basically all the bonuses of Windows re: gaming, with a great developer experience (like Linux/OSX). The prime annoyances are: - exposing a port to the entire LA
2.
by qq99 10mo ago
For me, the better HN is https://hckrnews.com/
3.
by qq99 11mo ago
I absolutely love it. I find it empowers me more than ever before, and my satisfaction is at all time highs. I'm even building projects now (videogames) that I probably wouldn't have started before. Here's where I'm at:
4.
by qq99 11mo ago
https://www.kyoubenkyou.com/ It's a few things: - very fast Japanese->English dictionary - hiragana / katakana / number / time reading quizzes - vocabulary quizzes based on wordlists you define and bu
5.
by qq99 1y ago
Very cool!
6.
by qq99 1y ago
I'm working on a few things, but the one that's gaining the most traction right now in terms of users is kyoubenkyou https://www.kyoubenkyou.com/ In short, it's a few things: - JA->EN dictionary - hiragana
7.
by qq99 1y ago
grok-code-fast-1 has been my preferred model lately, but I don't see any mention of it as part of this release. I'm wondering if this might be better? Even if grok-code-fast-1 might be slightly worse than Gemini 2.5 Pro, the speed
8.
by qq99 1y ago
Love the idea of local keys and appreciate your video explaining it! What do you use to record that style of video?
9.
by qq99 1y ago
Cool! Some feedback: it's too easy to get into a "dead chat". > Sorry, an error occurred while processing your request. No way to retry or resubmit or edit anything to get things moving again. Too terminal. If I just type
10.
by qq99 1y ago
So your <Button> component still has 60 tailwind classes on it? I think that might work in React, but might have a payload impact on server-rendered React. Another interesting point for using something like this (specifically, using s
11.
by qq99 1y ago
Sure, you might make a `<Button>` UI component (assume React), but if it embeds 30 classes in it, when you server-render this, every button on your page is contributing ~30 classes worth of bytes to the payload sent across the wire.
12.
by qq99 1y ago
I think you're agreeing with me. DaisyUI is 1 implementation of a standardization shortcut so you don't have to e.g., develop your own button, dropdown, modal, nav, etc (whatever you are interested to consume from DaisyUI)
13.
by qq99 1y ago
Yes, they'll typically have a UI component that accepts props and may have some internal state. DaisyUI is operating at the style layer, so you might use it to achieve the visuals for your UI component (regardless of how you achieve yo
14.
by qq99 1y ago
How are you going to style your components, if not via CSS classes?
15.
by qq99 1y ago
Tailwind is just a set of utility classes (that also tends to be compiled), while SCSS is a full-on CSS compiler that offers no utility classes by default. A lot of the features that SCSS enabled are now natively part of CSS, so it has fall
16.
by qq99 1y ago
IIRC the creator of tailwind might have been against @apply too, but it didn't seem like a good recommendation to me
17.
by qq99 1y ago
Just because you have Tailwind in your codebase doesn't mean you can _only_ use Tailwind. I often use a mixture of both when it makes sense. The Tailwind classes are often terser. Tailwind is not great for all things. > which emulat
18.
by qq99 1y ago
Tailwind is a set of utility CSS classes you can use that tend to guide you into writing CSS that looks like it "fits" together. E.g., consistent gaps if you use `gap-1`, `gap-2`, etc., rather than a hodgepodge of "hmm did I
19.
by qq99 1y ago
I'm surprised that a lot of the comments seem to be missing the reason that this project exists. In many tailwind projects, you inevitably end up wanting to standardize how a button looks, how a field looks, etc., rather than copy+past
20.
by qq99 1y ago
I imagine (and hope) I'm not being billed for requests that fail. In my own apps that use Anthropic API, sometimes the req just fails the initial connection (and so has to be retried), usually works in 1-2 retries.
21.
by qq99 1y ago
Cursor doesn't auto-retry my request, it presents me with a button to click to retry. If you know the request failed, you could just retry on my behalf!
22.
by qq99 1y ago
It's the Venom symbiote
23.
by qq99 1y ago
I was wondering about this. I was hesitant to add embedding-based search to my app because I didn't want to incur the latency to the embedding API provider blocking every search on initial render. Granted, you can cache the embeddings
24.
by qq99 1y ago
Wasn't this already available in AI Studio? It sounds like they also improved the image quality. It's hard to keep up with what's new with all these versions
25.
by qq99 1y ago
That's a really good point. I haven't done a lot of optimistic updates with LiveView yet. I'm not sure how sanely you could really achieve it (because it seems you'd lose the primary benefit: server-side rendering /
26.
by qq99 1y ago
The biggest downfall in my experience has been it can be a massive pain to find out where a method is defined in a huge codebase, especially with all the crazy ways in which one can declare methods. You can spend a non-trivial amount of tim
27.
by qq99 1y ago
Can't speak to ORMs, but I'd have a look at SolidStart. If you need an API, add in tRPC. End result is highly typed, can do SSR, and once you get used to it, it's a much better experience than using React. I still haven'
28.
by qq99 1y ago
If you're thinking about going back to SSR, I think you owe it to yourself to check out Phoenix LiveView (Elixir) and play with it for an afternoon. I've built a few apps in it now, and to me, it starts to feel a bit like server-s
29.
by qq99 2y ago
> However, Lynx isn't limited to React I think this could be huge! I'd love to see a SolidJS version
30.
by qq99 2y ago
What factors made you choose to go with a publisher vs. self-publish?

More ›