Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
qnrq
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
qnrq
10y ago
You can also route only read-only methods in urls.py, for example via: url( r'path/$', TheModelViewSetView.as_view({"get": "list"}), name="thename" ) or "
2.
▲
Show HN: Monitly – Real-time search engine
(monitly.com)
1 points
by
qnrq
10y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
qnrq
12y ago
Profit is wonderful, even more so if earned through other means than tracking users' Internet activity unknowingly. Most users of the Internet don't know that Google sees them in most corners and much of the data collection remain
4.
▲
by
qnrq
12y ago
Hi, OP here. >> We live under structured societies and under a specific set of rules we call LAW. We don't, you do. I packed my backpack and moved to the 3rd world at 22 and haven't ever been back because I need chaos. There
5.
▲
by
qnrq
12y ago
works fine here https://web.archive.org/web/20140408044206/https://blog.ipre...
6.
▲
How to test if your OpenSSL heartbleeds
(blog.ipredator.se)
2 points
by
qnrq
12y ago
|
2 comments
7.
▲
by
qnrq
13y ago
So it's an excellent opportunity for up and coming designers to contribute to a promising open source project.
8.
▲
Solving the browser crypto problem
(qnrq.se)
1 points
by
qnrq
13y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
by
qnrq
13y ago
"Didn't you just loose the security that you wanted by encrypting on localhost?" No, the sensitive information isn't being protected from localhost but from server A and anything else on the path between user and message
10.
▲
by
qnrq
13y ago
Check the links posted in the comment you replied to, it's not cryptography in JavaScript: it's JavaScript posting to a httpd on user's localhost which bridges GnuPG. It's not for doing cryptography in JavaScript, it
11.
▲
by
qnrq
13y ago
The questions that you raise is of course what I am interested in discussing. I can't think of any way that PGP/GPG protects you against keyloggers or a pre-infected computer. I agree that they are relevant threats but my question
12.
▲
by
qnrq
13y ago
That's a valid point, but you won't be effectively encrypt incoming email in the layer of a webmail client. You'd be better off incorporating that before the message is even saved to disk - in the mail delivery of your MTA. S
13.
▲
by
qnrq
13y ago
My plugin does nothing crypto based on the server side, everything is happening locally in the browser through JavaScript and in the future there will be an additional driver for performing crypto opts in GPG binaries as described in my com
14.
▲
by
qnrq
13y ago
Hi, I'm glad I found your comment, I just pushed something like what you just described to one of my repos yesterday. Hear me out, I'm not self promoting myself out of context here. I'm currently working on an OpenPGP integra
15.
▲
by
qnrq
15y ago
reminds me of http://youtify.com/
16.
▲
by
qnrq
16y ago
I completely agree. We didn't install a cert since there were some doubts around wether we would sign it ourselves or not. Either what we decide, a self signed cert is better than none, hence this is now fixed. All http traffic is now redir
17.
▲
Review my startup: Secure webmail service
(pipemail.org)
2 points
by
qnrq
16y ago
|
2 comments
18.
▲
by
qnrq
17y ago
You can read about !image here: http://duckduckgo.com/bang.html
19.
▲
French bread spiked with LSD in CIA experiment
(telegraph.co.uk)
5 points
by
qnrq
17y ago
|
2 comments
20.
▲
by
qnrq
17y ago
"The destructive character lives from the feeling, not that life is worth living, but that suicide is not worth the trouble."