pzullo

5 ms·

1.
by pzullo 3mo ago
this is something you would handle at the code level as you build your MCP - or better we do not offer those yet at platform level as it always seems that is something developers would put in the code - which shape would you imagine ?
2.
by pzullo 3mo ago
on claude you'll need an enterprise and team account here is their post about it https://claude.com/blog/observability-for-developers-buildin... on chat you can find it in the openai platform https://p
3.
by pzullo 3mo ago
Thanks for asking we have several! here is our own, it is both on the ChatGPT https://chatgpt.com/apps/manufact/asdk_app_69cbfd610c3881919... and Claude Connector store https://claude.ai/directory
4.
by pzullo 3mo ago
Thanks for the comment I wrote this piece that goes a bit into this https://manufact.com/blog/what-is-an-mcp-app TLDR Claude does it today, Chat will probably start soon.
5.
by pzullo 3mo ago
happy to onboard you personally! We did a stainless migration two days ago :)
6.
by pzullo 3mo ago
Thanks for the comment! Vercel is a generic cloud provider, so you won’t get any of the MCP specific features (listed in the post) and development experience - monetization is still not regulated by the protocol, so people would pay for you
7.
by pzullo 3mo ago
noted! thanks for the feedback, will be gone soon edit: gone
8.
by pzullo 3mo ago
thanks!
9.
by pzullo 3mo ago
thanks!
10.
by pzullo 3mo ago
hey thanks for the feedback, we do not really offer a "set" of pre made MCPs that we could show pre signup, unfortunately our platform requires you to deploy something to use it - we try to give an overview of all the features in
11.
by pzullo 3mo ago
a few thoughts for MCP: - typescript "runs" in the browser, which is very handy to develop browser side MCP Clients - for similar reasons it is the only real option to develop UIs for MCP Apps for instance not particularly relate
12.
by pzullo 3mo ago
with our SDK we provide many adapters to popular authentication providers which basically provision oauth on your server in one line of code, here the docs https://docs.mcp-use.com/typescript/server/authentication&
13.
by pzullo 3mo ago
thank you so much we have put a lot of love into our product! pricing: we offer several credit based products that have different cost - requests, build minutes, eval runs, checklist all have different unit cost the breakdown is here https
14.
by pzullo 3mo ago
+1 !! Thanks for putting it so clearly, also CLIs and REST have their space in some applications, I think MCP is a way to organize them and distribute them better
15.
Launch HN: Manufact (YC S25) – MCP Cloud(manufact.com)
111 points by pzullo 3mo ago|70 comments
16.
Show HN: How we made MCP development feel good(manufact.com)
6 points by pzullo 4mo ago|1 comments
17.
by pzullo 10mo ago
This is an interesting approach and I just saw your post on reddit too, good stuff!
18.
Show HN: Code Mode for MCP in MCP-use's client
3 points by pzullo 10mo ago|3 comments
19.
by pzullo 1y ago
Why did you use convex as backend?
20.
by pzullo 1y ago
We have it ! https://github.com/mcp-use/mcp-use-ts
21.
by pzullo 1y ago
Hey, awesome work with the error formatter, as explained above I think error creation falls more under the server responsibilities if it contains any logic about the error (e.g. is retryable). It would be interesting to hear your opinion on
22.
by pzullo 1y ago
Hey thanks for the comment, the work from https://github.com/bjoaquinc/mcp-error-formatter is great. I will definitely put some version of this into one of the next releases. Just opened an issue mentioning this thread
23.
by pzullo 1y ago
I'd love to hear what you do not like about their client. What issues does it have ?
24.
by pzullo 1y ago
Nice! shoot us a message on Linkedin :)
25.
by pzullo 1y ago
Thanks :)
26.
by pzullo 1y ago
Hey, we have an example in our readme and docs about how to build your custom agent. but you are right, we should probably fill the client section of the documentations with examples on how to use the client API in more details. Will be don
27.
by pzullo 1y ago
We designed this slightly differently where one can use the client directly an not only in our agent, the structure is more focused around the MCP functionality.
28.
by pzullo 1y ago
No
29.
by pzullo 1y ago
What other clients are you referring to ?
30.
by pzullo 1y ago
Hey thanks for the comment (xmcp in the house)! I can certainly agree with the sdk being a pain, why do you feel that the interaction is broken ? in which way ?

More ›