pyronik19

6 ms·

1.
by pyronik19 1mo ago
ACA is horrible for the middle class. The only reason it retains any type of popularity is because the media refuses to associated ballooning cost to cost redistribution that it enables. Preexisting conditions? Middle class family picking t
2.
by pyronik19 1y ago
Unfortunately their arrogance isn't false bravado. iPhones brand is extremely strong. Funny aside I know many women who won't date men who's text come up in green bubbles... thats branding.
3.
by pyronik19 1y ago
Like in the UK for spicy social media posts?
4.
by pyronik19 2y ago
We have like 100 years of bad government by people who love government to dispel this nonsense.
5.
by pyronik19 2y ago
Would there be a way for the bluetooth device to rotate its broadcast keys in a predictable way to avoid the iphone notification of "unknown airtag close by" messages? Seems like this could be exploited for surveillance.
6.
by pyronik19 2y ago
And antibiotics, computers, fertilizer, electricity, cars, stem cells, etc Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying throw caution to the wind, but ludditism also isn't the answer.
7.
by pyronik19 4y ago
Yes government bureaucrats got to drag political enemies off planes and kick them out of restaurants on the basis of wrongthink, masquerading dogma as science.
8.
by pyronik19 4y ago
>now this will get trotted out as an example against anything that ties a name to a firearm As it should be, "I told you so" all day long.
9.
by pyronik19 4y ago
The court isn't in the business of conferring rights, in so far as they were "taken away" it just corrected horrible precedent.
10.
by pyronik19 4y ago
Many people disagree with that interpretation so its not at all obviously correct. It was not interpreted that way at all until FDR threatened to pack the court.
11.
by pyronik19 4y ago
There is a reason the maxim exists "Hard cases make bad case law". Of course slavery is wrong, and in fact rebellion to end slavery is more appropriate that case law to end it. That said abortion isn't slavery and its unclear
12.
by pyronik19 4y ago
It's clear the original Roe v Wade was an ideological ruling. It was motivated reasoning. It's just being undone. I support first trimester abortions. Now go pass those laws in the states via the legislative process where it belon
13.
by pyronik19 4y ago
Shouldn't the legal analysis of a legal opinion be the norm? Facts don't care about your feelings.
14.
by pyronik19 4y ago
which may not be grounded on any text whatsoever. Well when your job is to interpret the constitution, it should be grounded on the text. That's why there are textualist who disagree with your interpretation of the role of the court. I
15.
by pyronik19 4y ago
From the decision: "The largely limitless reach of the dissenters’ standard is illustrated by the way they apply it here. First, if the “long sweep of history” imposes any restraint on the recognition of unenumerated rights, then Roe w
16.
by pyronik19 4y ago
How is that a compromise... a controversial judgement you like is fair the one you don't isn't? That's not a standard.
17.
by pyronik19 4y ago
Common Law interpretation sure, you need to use the logic and decisions of the court to inform future decisions, but those decisions must be grounded on actual text and insofar as bad decisions are made they should be corrected. Should we h
18.
by pyronik19 4y ago
its fair when you get your way, its unfair when you don't? You think "Roe v Wade" is the appearance of neutrality but Dobbs isn't? What is your standard of fair vs unfair?
19.
by pyronik19 4y ago
When FDR threatened to pack the court when his New Deal legislation kept being struck down since it violated federalism. “the switch in time that saved nine.” https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/when-franklin-rooseve
20.
by pyronik19 4y ago
Well, those of us who believe in a textualist definition of the constitution believe the process for adding constitutional rights is a constitutional amendment and we control the court.
21.
by pyronik19 4y ago
If that is your position, you think that when the came down with Roe V Wade that WAS political independence and legitimacy and when overturn it its not? You can't have your cake and eat it too. It's not "illegitimate" wh
22.
by pyronik19 4y ago
"recognizes that there are unwritten rights." Basically...legislating from the Bench. This has no place in constitutional jurisprudence.
23.
by pyronik19 4y ago
That's what it was when they came down with Roe originally, they are just returning to NOT being a legislative body and returning this decision to where it belongs.... the legislature.
24.
by pyronik19 4y ago
So they arrested and held in prison tons of people from Jan6 and held them in prison for over a year based on cell tracking data. I am sure you were objecting to that.
25.
by pyronik19 4y ago
Will it censor "vaccine misinformation", "election misinformation", "russian disinformation" and all the other mainstream topics that google actively suppresses in favor of the narrative or is your moniker of &
26.
by pyronik19 4y ago
I am mocking the justification that leftist used censorship and deplatforming by using their own bloated phrase.
27.
by pyronik19 4y ago
So I guess next stop is President
28.
by pyronik19 4y ago
You have freedom of speech just not freedom from consequences :)
29.
by pyronik19 4y ago
> I consider it treason to continue to promote lies about election fraud as it attacks democracy. I consider support for the obvious election fraud treason.. the only lie is we actually have a functioning democracy and legitimate electio
30.
by pyronik19 4y ago
Right after they used location data to expose election fraud lol... plugging that hole in their fraud.

More ›