proto_lambda

9 ms·

1.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
> everyone using ChatGPT knows that verification is part of the proccess lol. lmao
2.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
> On Apple platforms or on Windows, you could look at the crash logs captured by the operating system’s built-in crash reporter, but on Linux that’s typically all you had to go on. On modern linux distros, simply typing `coredumpctl debu
3.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
Forced open source for everyone but them . They retain copyright and will continue to sell proprietary adaptions, while forbidding everyone else to do the same.
4.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
Yosys and nextpnr have been production-ready for years, they handle your average hobbyist FPGA project just fine (and 1-2 orders of magnitude faster than the vendor tools).
5.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
> Open source tooling is very primitive and not usable Maybe you're working off old information, but the FOSS tooling (ghdl, yosys, nextpnr) is completely sufficient for hobbyists. If you're doing huge, high-speed designs on ex
6.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
There are such things are RAM encryption, but yes, overall it's more fragile from a security perspective than a strong plain passphrase.
7.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
With properly functioning secure boot and no bugs in the entire software stack, it doesn't matter if the disk is decrypted automatically, since you can't access the system without OS-level authentication. If you tried to replace s
8.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
If you rely only on TPM for key storage, yes, the disk is unlocked automatically and any sufficiently broken userspace application you can get your hands on will let you access it. You can still combine TPM+passphrase/PIN though, at th
9.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
Thankfully that's just as illegal as tracking without consent (or in this case, explicit rejection).
10.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
That definitely exists, but AFAIK it requires special equipment to get the signal across transformers. Not much of a problem in urban environments, but e.g. in low-density areas in the US, where every house has its own transformer, it might
11.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
There's also Brandweer Lunteren, which had to shut down for a while recently but seems to be sanctioned now. Not much traffic footage there though, being a pretty small town in the Netherlands.
12.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
> I'm not a fan of the fact that ÖBB couchette compartments don't have locks on their doors The ones I know have both a turning lock that can be opened from the outside by the conductor or anyone else with a wrench (so more of
13.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
> None of the above has anything to do with particular email message authenticity. Only if you're on a shared email hoster. If you're the only one that has access to the mail server's signing keys, it's gonna be real
14.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
The tweets are real, and a couple people joined in on the collaborative fiction at the time.
15.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
By the time you publish the key, it is no longer in your DNS records and thus no longer trusted by any receiving mail server.
16.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
> It is trivial for a prosecutor to prove the owner of the domain, or the owner of the host that used the DKIM key The point of publishing the keys is that _anyone_ can then sign messages, making "ownership of the domain" a mea
17.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
You'd get the opposite problem with "heavy" - correct in layman terms, nonsensical in a scientific context.
18.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
> It doesn’t seem that terrible to prohibit this (Probably some very good reason to counter this though!) The simple reason is that the whole point of editions is that you absolutely do not have to worry about which one you choose. They
19.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
If the subdomains aren't supposed to be public, the public also doesn't need to trust the TLS certs. Sign them with your own CA and trust it on the devices that should be able to access the domains.
20.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
If you're interested in or already comfortable with Rust, Amos (fasterthanlime) has a nice long-form series that goes into this, basically building a custom ELF loader in the end. The writing style isn't everyone's cup of tea
21.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
The package manager updates the browser, just like it updates everything else.
22.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
The main goal of using async for me is to not have to handle all the IO wait state machines myself. It does a pretty good job of that, and as long as my program consists of a bunch of tasks concurrently waiting for IO to finish, a single th
23.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
There is no runtime (other than init/exit handling). The main thing that provides memory safety without a GC is the borrow checker, which is a language feature and independent of the smart pointer types in the standard library.
24.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
> Rust just took C++ std::unique and std::shared ptr and made those integrated directly in the language, and the only option for allocation Not really. Both Box and Rc/Arc are first and foremost library features implemented using th
25.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
That works until a country decides to hop across the international date line the day after they switch from DST to normal time, and the timestamp occurs three times ;)
26.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
It is indeed the latter, but it only knows about 19 so far: https://github.com/df7cb/sdate/blob/ace93c8d301c333a96ff354e...
27.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
Digital wrist watches can go 10+ years on a single battery, and they typically have transistors switching at 32kHz (as opposed to price tags, which could be completely static until you press a button).
28.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
There is no undefined behaviour in Safe Rust. You're right about Unsafe Rust of course.
29.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
Because you're not actually creating a filtered list, you're just filtering an iterator.
30.
by proto_lambda 3y ago
"One of the best things you can do for yourself is having enough money" yeah, no shit. Except many (or even most) people can't.

More ›