promofaux

5 ms·

1.
by promofaux 6y ago
v5.0 image was released minutes after the main v5.0 release. I've personally not tried :latest, but I am told that works. I prefer to use named tags
2.
by promofaux 6y ago
One of the Pi-hole dev's here. The comment you are replying to is talking about the blog post about this CVE, not Pi-hole's aesthetics. (Which haven't changed, btw) Say hi to J from me.
3.
by promofaux 7y ago
Keep an eye on this PR for future functionality... https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/pull/2935
4.
by promofaux 7y ago
And of course, now we have more control over/hooks into the resolver, we can look at things like per-client configs: https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/pull/2935
5.
by promofaux 7y ago
Hi there, one of the Pi-hole Devs here. This is something we are very much looking into. Take a look at this PR[1] for more details! No ETAs as yet, of course, but it's something that has been asked about time and time again, and we th
6.
by promofaux 8y ago
That post is 2 years old, and the op understood and was ok with the outcome... Oobe is either 1)leave suggested defaults as is 2)don't use those lists. Option 2 is available in the installer before you're even up and running. Ther
7.
by promofaux 8y ago
Hmmm, not sure I recall. Mind linking back to the conversation? Point is, we don't choose what domains are blocked or not, so there is nothing we can do except ship with a default whitelist. But we're not going to do that either,
8.
by promofaux 8y ago
As commented below, we don't actually maintain any of the lists, so that wasn't us you spoke to! You can configure the lists that you use to suit your needs. You can also whitelist any domains that you need. It's up to you wh
9.
by promofaux 10y ago
When you say unbearably slow, do you mean the actual DNS resolution, or the Admin interface? An Rpi3, even a Rpi B or zero is plenty good enough for DNS queries! The Admin interface has been a bit of a bugbear for a while, but we are workin
10.
by promofaux 10y ago
There is a disable button on the web interface[1] which allows you to either disable it permanently, or for a specific amount of time. Of course, client devices need to clear their DNS cache, too, in order for this to work properly, but at
11.
by promofaux 10y ago
Of course it can! If it has a domain name, it can be blocked. What you may see is the browser grumbling about it. Essentially all that is happening is a client asks for a domain (e.g ssl.google.com) and if it is on the blacklist, then it re
12.
by promofaux 10y ago
Ah! I did wonder what was going on.. :) I've heard of HN before, but never actively participated, hence only signing up today! Thanks for vouching for me :)
13.
by promofaux 10y ago
https://github.com/diginc/docker-pi-hole
14.
by promofaux 10y ago
Exactly that! The name has just kind of stuck, even though you can in fact run it on most linux distros (We officially support Ubuntu/Debian based distros, but there is limited support for Centos, and even forks for Arch, and Docker!),
15.
by promofaux 10y ago
You can always review the code for yourself over on our github repo ( https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole )! As well as the devs, there are so many pairs of eyes on the code that if anything fishy were to happen, everyone
16.
by promofaux 10y ago
We have a web interface with a whole host of tools to easily identify and whitelist the domains that may or may not be causing issues with sites you browse. Everyone's mileage varies, but I have only had to whitelist 5 or 6 sites using
17.
by promofaux 10y ago
Pi-hole Dev here. The only domains added to the whitelist are the domains on which the source lists are themselves hosted. It's probably complete over-kill, but the reasoning behind it is just in case one list tried to blacklist anothe