proline

6 ms·

1.
by proline 1y ago
Revisiting "incorrect predictions" is a great way to learn about the error's in one's thinking and grow as a person. If your way of dealing with incorrect predictions is to pretend they never happened, then that learning
2.
by proline 1y ago
Interesting trends! I wonder what Gruber would say? Certainly the tone around Apple is different these days. One indicative moment was when Hollywood made Tim Cook the villain of Jurassic World Dominion and the reaction was... crickets. Or
3.
by proline 1y ago
In Jan 2025 his archive has 13 articles. 5 were about Trump. One about Pebble was more link than original content. His archive for Jan 2014, Jan 2015, and Jan 2016 is 100% tech. Going from 100% quality content to 54% is a big drop. I'm
4.
by proline 1y ago
It's important to be able to read and understand both sides of an argument. Sadly most people prefer to read media that's slanted in the way they agree with. As for the EU, the land is devoid of innovation. Whether it's a cur
5.
by proline 1y ago
My question was, has Gruber written enough non-political articles to know? Like if the number of high quality, original (many DF posts are just links to content elsewhere), about tech articles is down 90%, then of course his article perfo
6.
by proline 1y ago
As an Apple user, I'm happy with the gatekeeping, it's why I use their products, and frankly I want more of it. If it was up to me I'd like to see them enforcing their human interface guidelines a lot more. Why can't you
7.
by proline 1y ago
Have you looked into how much of DF was about Apple and how much was about Donald Trump during the affected time periods? It seems that you write about tech a lot less and politics a lot more. Which is fine, it's your blog! But don&#x2