ppbutt

7 ms·

1.
by ppbutt 8y ago
30% is outrageous
2.
by ppbutt 8y ago
Thanks for the tip. Shame on them.
3.
by ppbutt 8y ago
No
4.
by ppbutt 8y ago
I'd imagine some recognition technology could take into account body proportions, posture, (commonly worn) apparel, etc. to make facial recognition less needed.
5.
by ppbutt 8y ago
"They" would be the proper term.
6.
by ppbutt 8y ago
Instagram has the same clause too
7.
by ppbutt 8y ago
User intrusion seems to be a pattern with Mozilla now.
8.
by ppbutt 9y ago
It's the obvious malicious intent that we see time and time again with Facebook, the companies they own, and like-minded companies like Google and Amazon. People are fed up with the BS. It's atrocious that no tech people speak out
9.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Do you realize Facebook has the power to change this all, but instead keeps people misinformed with their obvious malicious intent?
10.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Because it's apparent that's not Facebook's goal.
11.
by ppbutt 9y ago
So when is everybody going to band together to bury Facebook and all these other insidious tech companies?
12.
by ppbutt 9y ago
How do you all bypass these horrendous paywalls?
13.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Monopoly and complacent governements
14.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Good info
15.
by ppbutt 9y ago
CIA creates more terrorists than it purportedly defuses by seeding deep resentment in people through the CIA's actions (torture being one of them).
16.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Does this include the forced collection of the user's usage data?
17.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Funny how they're adament that Facebook doesn't utilize microphone (while they still don't really know themselves). Why is it laughable that Facebook is using both the FB Pixel, microphone, and other technologies to spy?
18.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Any other source or way to get around the WSJ paywall?
19.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Research with caution. (Guidelines/laws maybe?)
20.
by ppbutt 9y ago
They already exist in parts of the world like Saudi Arabia, no? (Can't read the article because I don't pay to view their site..)
21.
by ppbutt 9y ago
In what way?
22.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Don't you think some of that could be perpetrated by Google, to sabotage competition? Same thing plagued Vidme, but the thing is - you can find the same stuff on YouTube - it's just more diluted by other content.
23.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Anybody else worried/cautious about giving a company even more data about one's location, driving habits, etc. (also, without that company sharing that data with the user whose data it is) - also, knowing that the company is truly
24.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Right, nobody would ever lie or stretch the truth right?
25.
by ppbutt 9y ago
"Facebook to put out PR story to try to stay relevant"
26.
by ppbutt 9y ago
And all while profiting from their users (and non-users) behind their back.
27.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Funny how HackerNews deletes comments that warn against this... what side are the admins on?
28.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Guy named Sentdex has YouTube tutorials for machine learning using GTA.
29.
by ppbutt 9y ago
Grammatical
30.
by ppbutt 9y ago
"Television has sought to make football more palatable to viewing audiences by magnifying the game’s balletic beauty and deëmphasizing the its brute concussive aggression." Grammar error in the first photo caption...

More ›