postcarnival

7 ms·

1.
by postcarnival 10y ago
It's just a deterrent, part of a broader restrengthening of our nations' sovereignty imo. It sends a message. The amount of money is quite small when compared to real sources of government debt such as entitlements or the military
2.
by postcarnival 10y ago
Uh, did you support Obama and 800B he spent on infrastructure? Were you gonna support Clinton and her proposed $300B borrowed from the public for infrastructure (copying Obama's failed move)? If you could relax off the vitriol you migh
3.
by postcarnival 10y ago
"in the electoral college" aka the system that elects our President where Trump won 306 to her 232
4.
by postcarnival 10y ago
this made me think of you http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/12/03/im-democrat-and-im...
5.
by postcarnival 10y ago
Yes, sort of like the belligerent democratic policies of the past 8 years that have us 20T in debt and counting...
6.
by postcarnival 10y ago
If the wall is so "symbolic", what do you care if it's (further) built?
7.
by postcarnival 10y ago
> the middle class didn't vote Trump, they sat the whole thing out. Wrong. Trump won the election in a landslide of the electoral college and likely a majority of the popular vote if you audit the southwestern states you abhor to fi
8.
by postcarnival 10y ago
First off, the southwest states are anything but "big ugly". The wall isn't an endgame solution it's part of a larger shift in overall policy to actually enforce our existing immigration laws which will also include boot
9.
by postcarnival 10y ago
sorry but this is so inaccurate... this thinking is what will prevent the democrats from winning for the next decade..
10.
by postcarnival 10y ago
Simple solution: amend the constitution and ban the 14th amendments birthright clause. Are there any other countries on Earth that support people sneaking in to pop out a baby with the knowledge that said country will fully pay for and gran
11.
by postcarnival 10y ago
agree, I'm optimistic, he may be the best President ever...
12.
by postcarnival 10y ago
So untrue. It's a thoughtless played out argument that holds no water.
13.
by postcarnival 10y ago
Cracked down meaning we are not letting in illegal immigrants period. As far as the cost, you're incorrect so please do some research. The cost of building a border wall is a drop in the bucket compared to the cost of taking care of th
14.
by postcarnival 10y ago
> If the Dems dig in their heals and cater more to non citizens than they do their own citizens, I'm afraid they may lose in the next election again. This is precisely why Trump won more than any reason. He made an appeal to the mos
15.
by postcarnival 10y ago
Would you be more agreeable if we gave amnesty to all existing illegals and then cracked down hard and built a much stronger border going forward? Where is the common ground?
16.
by postcarnival 10y ago
Yes but since all of this fear-mongering is contrived by the liberal safe-space culture that has bred groups like this and not based in reality, we won't need to do any of that.
17.
by postcarnival 10y ago
I'm sorry but I strongly disagree. There is a CLEAR distinction between who is here legally and who is here illegally. In fact we have specific laws that define precisely the difference. I don't feel sorry for people that have com
18.
by postcarnival 10y ago
This is sad, you really think Trump is anti-immigrant? If you paid half a moment of attention you would know he is anti-ILLEGAL immigrant which is perfectly reasonable in a sovereign country with immigration laws.
19.
by postcarnival 10y ago
in 7th grade...
20.
by postcarnival 10y ago
When did I "parrot" anything as truth? I said I find it highly suspicious. If you want to go down the path of "fake news" sites how about we talk about almost every major network that had Clinton winning in a landslide?
21.
by postcarnival 10y ago
It might be so, but I also find reports of 3+ million illegals, 4+ million dead people, and other alleged acts of fraud to be suspicious... If we're going to go down that path it won't be pretty and it will likely involve more tha
22.
by postcarnival 10y ago
Let's not pretend this is some altruistic "academic" endeavor to satiate some curiosity. This is a thought-out play borne out of the rejection of the election result by the left.
23.
by postcarnival 10y ago
it will lead nowhere... but civil war would be interesting!
24.
by postcarnival 10y ago
a precursor to the fall of the American empire
25.
by postcarnival 10y ago
> at our scale. Care to elaborate what that scale is? We're using ember for a new app that expects very large traffic volumes on continual basis with realtime components etc... I've worked with ember for the past few years and
26.
by postcarnival 10y ago
actually I just read the replies and I see quite a few productive ones! just saying...
27.
by postcarnival 10y ago
You're criticizing a presidency that hasn't even seen it's first day! All of the "evidence" also pointed to Clinton winning in a landslide, and then a stock market crash after he won... what happened? Ya. Relax.
28.
by postcarnival 10y ago
thank you for a coherent post, I had to scroll to near the bottom past the liberal cesspool above to get to this...
29.
by postcarnival 10y ago
so what, then let's offer solutions and try to get them enacted? why all the armchair bitching on this site as if everyone is an expert just because they write code? what he did is nothing short of monumental and he WANTS to help Ameri
30.
by postcarnival 10y ago
how do we know that "clean energy" hasn't been artificially propped up to begin with? if we can burn coal much cleaner and more efficiently then so what? let's do it if it's cheaper. We can still develop new technol

More ›