polotics

5 ms·

1.
by polotics 6d ago
I was on unquantized 27B, and also Q8 K XL, same "Need do..." paragraphs. We landed in near but distinct morrasses I guess.
2.
by polotics 7d ago
They didn't actually steal in the sense that the information is still there on the internet.... About these shredded rare books, now we're talking. If I may propose instead of "steal" I think we could agree to write they
3.
by polotics 7d ago
I have seen plenty of Qwen 3.8 27B's caveman-like "Need doing this & that" thoughts. And on cerebras now I've seen them come real fast!
4.
by polotics 7d ago
Glucocorticoids in your early amygdala? That's a bummer! Blame the game, not the player! In today's kind spirit of early-internet you're also not a dog on the internet communities, there you go... No warranty granted or impli
5.
by polotics 8d ago
Repeating myself here but anyone who has not yet watched the whole 2024 series of Prof. Sapolsky "Human Behavioural Biology" lectures series... really should. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZI2GQlNdJA RIP Lee Ho
6.
by polotics 8d ago
"The gap became the north star" is written large enough though: I could read it with my own Aieyes! It's also the only sentence I read on that page before closing it, of course.
7.
by polotics 9d ago
The one weird trick of reassigning all the income from that contents-stealing to the original posters would I think cover a lot of the realignment.
8.
by polotics 9d ago
I wouldn't call this a bias. More likely an A/B tested find that (1) algorithmic YouTube video-surfacing with keyword "graph" plus AI related name-dropping was effective, and (2) the already well established journalistic
9.
by polotics 9d ago
Are you serious about this imbalance? it's the seriously rich that have taken all of the spoils, that's where the massive imbalance is. I'm not disagreeing that some manual work require forms of intelligence that are underval
10.
by polotics 9d ago
So much of this yes, colleagues who think doing AI work is asking Claude to, as you so eloquently wrote "vomit a novel", and allow themselves to disengage their brains. The joke is at the level of developers, the constant sharpeni
11.
by polotics 9d ago
how do you know it is for ads? how do you know it will always be only for ads if it now is?
12.
by polotics 9d ago
GDPR compliance lawsuitssss in 3...
13.
by polotics 10d ago
I put it to you that seeing a chord: on paper, or in math or in chord notation, (eg. FminSus4) is something you should only master once you are able to hear that chord. Otherwise you are (that's a quote) "dancing about architec
14.
by polotics 10d ago
this my friend, is the point. I refuse to not hold the human fully and entirely accountable. I put it to you that all slop is human slop.
15.
by polotics 10d ago
why oh why does the author think that it is ok to have the first thing people will read be completely devoid of clarity and to-the-point substance? """meclaw is three things, and you only install the first one. meclaw is the
16.
by polotics 10d ago
Haha well it's easy then please send us the MIDI, Openscore, Lylipond, MP3... anything really, of a composition of yours that will be as appealing as Twinkle Twinkle Little Star. What else do I see: congruence between melody and lyrics
17.
by polotics 10d ago
Sure. It is a trope amongst gigging musicians that over-intellectualizing the feels is a massive no-no. Hence the joke about Db being the saddest chord... also Phil Collins said that, he would know :-D... ...and C# being the most evil cho
18.
by polotics 11d ago
Let us try an experiment shall we: listen to any music you like and try and match the information the article provided to the complexity of what you are hearing. How much do you see a path from A(rticle) to S(ound in your ear). This article
19.
by polotics 11d ago
it really depends how you do it, I don't think one serious non biased study has ever been done. probably an ultrasound bath is the most energy and water-efficient method
20.
by polotics 11d ago
what's moral panic got to do with inflated energy prices, noise, and polluted water?
21.
by polotics 12d ago
regulatory moat is the theory I guess
22.
by polotics 12d ago
yep "next-embedding" predictor is more correct, and not just at the end but through the layers, and folding back dimensions into that one next token is one small final step, and next-embedding could be named "next-meaning&quo
23.
by polotics 12d ago
Not trying to be provocative or anything, but ELIZA 60 years ago was already a better psychoanalist than many people I know. `By your metrics, we achieved AGI in 1966.` https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA
24.
by polotics 13d ago
Nah as long as you don't give them first-names, I think you should be ok. also: Pretty pleaser please people don't get your agents registered as direct-reports in the org-chart with HR!
25.
by polotics 13d ago
Call me when Astra gets the Nobel prize... We'll have AGI when prizes have two categories, one for assisted humans, and one for pure-AI.
26.
by polotics 13d ago
At the end of the first paragraph there is this sentence: "Training support is a hypothesis consistent with these results, not something this study proves." I understand it, but I find the wording very unnatural. To improve readab
27.
by polotics 13d ago
OK so there is a better angle to look at all this, there really is: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357868645_Edgar_All...
28.
by polotics 13d ago
This is so weird, because using a script to invoke the agy cli is clearly using a "third party tool to access the service" !
29.
by polotics 13d ago
What is preventing anyone from automating on top of the normal google Antigravity CLI?
30.
by polotics 15d ago
I disagree. This trolling and misdirection are not in the movie. Also, both are clearly effective, and a discourse that warps economic impact on US midterms voters within identities, reduces the chance of exposing the bad consequences and r

More ›