pluto_modadic

6 ms·

271.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
that'd be the slow mode, though
272.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
they're saying they jump between one and the other. ask DHT, then ask swarm, then ask DHT, then ask swarm.
273.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
outgoing rate limits, and also it could exhaust the overall rate with useless traffic.
274.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
a waiter is a frontline employee, who has to do what "the man" wants, the crummy, unseen company, which can screw them over at any moment HR is "the man", coming to screw them, the reaper incarnate. sometimes judges can
275.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
yeah, I was like "you check the user's notification settings, right? right?"
276.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
Kubernetes: because we have cloud engineers and they're not busy, right? it's not like they could be doing more important things if they weren't chasing fires.... wait why is my head count soaring...
277.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
continuous sync - mutagen.io (maybe you could extract some of the libraries) depends on if it's large or small files.
278.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
"move to the cloud" "move to on-prem" "move to acquisition"
279.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
office /without/ commute
280.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
without reading the article, the title is basically the thesis of every CIO/CTO who's drunk the koolaid and thinks moving to AWS somehow removes complexity. It trades complexity of code for grey problems and complex infrastructure
281.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
I love this. In my college library there's a row of books on mathematics, a single shelf unit on computer science (system admin, SQL, the works), a shelf on cryptography most books on RSA two books on ECC and ONE single book on essoter
282.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
it's interesting to study a balance neural network by evolving a few and going "so how would this AI withstand choppy seas" if it checks up with the map of how our brains learn to keep us upright, then we learn other side eff
283.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
> "actively watching if you display suspicious behavior" oh lord, the potential for racist bias here. Or just bias against nervous fliers. the "one officer monitors multiple kiosks" thing just again makes me think the
284.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
oh, oh my. The golang opposite where you don't have language extensions and should be able to grok everything about the language in your head all at once... yeah I'm going with "simpler language".
285.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
they take a complex problem, AND a complex solution, and make it beautifully simple so /it just works/, in a way no other system has. The documentation is superb and frequently just makes sense when you do it.
286.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
I feel this in my newcomer bones. Every time someone badass writes something in erlang or clojure or rust or something and I'm like... "the problem was complicated enough, why'd you add an esoteric language to it?"
287.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
so things like glassdoor shouldn't exist? or people shouldn't warn of bad managers/jobs?
288.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
circuit breakers /can/ make sense, if done rationally. kinda like that line in fallbacks vs failovers where "if the second system is so reliable why bother with the first?" https://aws.amazon.com/builders
289.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
cool... what does this mean the best linter / correctness checking is at the moment? I have some code that eventually core dumps and honestly I don't know what I'm doing wrong, and neither do any golang tools I've tried
290.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
Session depends on the Loki blockchain, so I dispute point 1.
291.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
I sense that people will insist on their requirements being hard unnecessarily... and that the bug is the fault of it being on a near-realtime system instead of it being faulty even on a realtime one.
292.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
it messes with googling "without servers" (when I mean peer to peer, non-scam systems), or when I mean "without a public IPv4" (as in, without a server), like offline-first (which is still /eventually connected to a
293.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
if it fulfills the same function, does it matter? if you have an ad ID for a person, say example@example.com, and you want to deduplicate it, if you provide them with the names, the company that buys the data can still "blend" it
294.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
so they seized the domain kinda like you do with malware? it's unfortunate that the only button for Vercel admins is "seize everything in this account", as that's a bit imprecise if one domain is hacked but if it's
295.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
I think that using plain language is good! There's actually a thing about agencies not using cryptic or confusing communications - https://www.plainlanguage.gov/law/ :) now, if you're being so plain as to obs
296.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
yay! another filippo post! I always appreciate their writing <3 now the silly part! [wildly gesticulating at a particle board filled with photos and strings] "that's just what the nice golang cryptographers want you to think!&q
297.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
it's a superposition of two states: - insecure and you know it - insecure and you don't know it until you sneeze and someone's stolen everything.
298.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
only if they can keep training from the commons and stealing other people's work.
299.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
or society as a whole should pay well for writers of all subjects, not just FAANG ones ;)
300.
by pluto_modadic 3y ago
I think it's important to look at whole lifecycle cost of things. for example - https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/80580.pdf where natural gas is 400 g co2/kwh, oil is 800 g co2/kwh and all renewabl

More ›