pljung

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by pljung 1y ago

   You essentially describe the motivation for Stiftung Warentest [0]. They’re massively successful in Germany, and I rely on their tests for many consumer goods I buy. Access isn’t free though, typically costs around 5EUR per test. Coincident
2. 2.▲
   by pljung 2y ago

   It made sense to me as part of the broader theme of separating work activities from private ones. And that separation being the smart action.
3. 3.▲
   by pljung 3y ago

   sqlite is also part of Python‘s standard library. No need to add dependencies, things just work. If you don’t plan to run heavy analytical workloads in your research, sqlite is probably just fine.
4. 4.▲
   by pljung 3y ago

   Did he also loose trust in OpenAI back when DALL-E exclusively generated images of white males when you prompted it with "CEO"? And images of women when prompted with "nurse"?[0] Or is this just the old google-bashing? [
5. 5.▲
   by pljung 4y ago

   I agree that the headline is misleading.
6. 6.▲
   by pljung 4y ago

   Always a red flag if "potential benefits" cover a broad spectrum of unrelated symptoms: depression, cancer prevention, cognitive ability, heart health, diabetes, digestive health, even wound healing. A dodgy article at best.
7. 7.▲
   by pljung 4y ago

   I enjoyed reading your article, thanks for writing it. I think your recommendation to new devs to focus on Next.js in 2018 (!) was prescient. > I no longer think front-end suffers the instability people accuse it of. Do you mind elaborat