plange

10 ms·

1.
by plange 6y ago
Donated by Joe Beda himself.
2.
by plange 6y ago
Gitlab states it wants to go public this year https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/being-a-public-company/
3.
by plange 7y ago
> men. people Otherwise i agree. Having just spent a week on-site at a client, you just notice a lot more problems (or start to understand the details of previously identified problems) that are in your capacity to fix.
4.
by plange 7y ago
They are starting in a garage https://blog.jessfraz.com/post/born-in-a-garage/ Read up before you make unfounded claims
5.
by plange 7y ago
Already happened. OpenNIC had to move the users from .free over to .libre
6.
by plange 7y ago
http://www.salimvirani.com/facebook/ https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/23/facebook-releases-new-cambri... http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/06&#x2F
7.
by plange 7y ago
I agree with everything you said, but this movement has been going on for a long time but and has been very bad at... hisss.. marketing. These are complex topics and people don't want to put in the effort to understand them so this n
8.
by plange 7y ago
From the commit message: > 0.0.0.0/32 is still prohibited, of course.
9.
by plange 7y ago
How is this different than ticketswap?
10.
by plange 7y ago
This is NIH syndrome. You're way better off following the standards, and likely implementing standard libraries to actually make use of them.
11.
by plange 7y ago
You can do both.
12.
by plange 7y ago
Worked at a startup that unfortunately went under, trying to reuse heat generated in datacenters. (saves on electricity spend on airco and saves on having to generate heat elsewhere) Luckily some competitors still exist: https://
13.
by plange 7y ago
ecosia.org
14.
by plange 7y ago
Journalists do that all the time, it's literally part of the job. Though it is rare to see because there are repercussions.
15.
by plange 8y ago
you should probably upgrade that kernel
16.
by plange 8y ago
Confusion prevention squad: > That is to get to 3.3.3.3 A 3.3.0.0/16 route takes precedence over a 3.0.0.0/32 route. I think you mean: > That is to get to 3.3.3.3 A 3.3.0.0/16 route takes precedence over a 3.0.0.0/
17.
by plange 9y ago
I had this exact same problem with the way i & my team approached our kubernetes clusters. I come from a network management background and in that space we all know of a tool called RANCID. A simple tool that logged into your switches&#
18.
by plange 9y ago
Thanks not only for making this, but also describing your process in a blog. I use ngx_http_auth_request_module a lot and used haproxy a lot in the past but it's currently too limiting for my usecases - now i know it supports lua we&#x
19.
by plange 9y ago
They still haven't licensed their code, which makes it very hard to use.
20.
by plange 9y ago
There's some good resources out there, the problem here is that most people simply don't care or don't think it's part of their job to fix these things. https://mozilla.github.io/server-side-tls/ssl-
21.
by plange 9y ago
NAT is not security at all.
22.
by plange 9y ago
Classic mistake. Except it's not really a mistake, but a conscious decision by whoever was in charge at the time (with the main focus probably being growing the company and not hurting current customers). How do we fix that though? Sta
23.
by plange 9y ago
Unstable over testing? Really? Why? :-) I've been running stretch on a lenovo carbon x1 for the last 2 years and it's been one of the first problem-free experiences running linux on the desktop (linux user for.. 18 years). Really
24.
by plange 9y ago
> The easiest way to do that probably results in a callback to Big Daddy G every time I access anything sensitive and I'm cool with that. Why?!
25.
by plange 9y ago
I'd wager we haven't seen the last bug yet, if ever.
26.
by plange 9y ago
You are completely right up to the point that people are able to update their phones.
27.
by plange 9y ago
Nothing in life is free. Quality software doesn't create itself out of thin air (yet, if ever). That means someone has to make an investment. You don't have to invest in the upkeep of the foundation of your house, but if some bugs
28.
by plange 9y ago
Yes, possibly.
29.
by plange 9y ago
Sorry, i wasn't trying to imply they shifted blame. But atlassian does bare the legal&moral burden of securing their product here.
30.
by plange 9y ago
Then you would be fine with the standard boilerplate "your data is secure with us"? I'm happy they say this.. now i'd like some sort of proof :-)

More ›