pkmiec

6 ms·

1.
by pkmiec 6y ago
3
2.
Hitler uses Docker(youtube.com)
3 points by pkmiec 10y ago|0 comments
3.
Ruby, RubyGems and Bundler(engineering.appfolio.com)
3 points by pkmiec 10y ago|1 comments
4.
by pkmiec 10y ago
the new concurrency is part of ruby 3. matz says he wishes for it to be out by 2020. but who knows :).
5.
Ruby Fellow Hired(engineering.appfolio.com)
1 points by pkmiec 10y ago|0 comments
6.
by pkmiec 11y ago
AppFolio - Santa Barbara, CA - REMOTE We're looking for a C-hacker with experience in just-in-time compilers, virtual machines, runtime optimizations, etc to work with the Ruby core team on performance. We primarily use Ruby / Rub
7.
by pkmiec 11y ago
Yes, we are going to hire someone. We now have the position open and are looking for candidates. We already have a couple of folks interested and we'd like to get a few more so that we can find the best fit. [0] http://www.a
8.
by pkmiec 11y ago
This is definitely a nice improvement which can lead to Ruby performance improvements. It's also worth noting that Ruby 3 in general will have a focus on performance. Matz talked about performance and the Ruby 3x3 effort during his Rub
9.
by pkmiec 11y ago
good for them to do a major city. i'm still waiting for pdx.
10.
by pkmiec 11y ago
I love solid well tested technology. Let's try to make it faster :).
11.
by pkmiec 11y ago
Images are fun. But I'd like to see a demo showing how http/2 can affect asset managers / web development. Perhaps show a site with 1-5 bundled css / js vs 100-500 individual css / js. Does a demo like that exist?
12.
by pkmiec 11y ago
how does this compare to uglifier?
13.
by pkmiec 12y ago
I originally read about this patch here, http://samsaffron.com/archive/2014/04/08/ruby-2-1-garbage-co... . There hasn't been any activity on the upstream proposal for almost a year. Has the core team
14.
by pkmiec 12y ago
The pipeline features of gocd seems very nice. However, last time I looked at gocd it did not support feature branches. As far as I could tell, it was not due to technical reasons but rather due to the whole feature branch vs continuous int
15.
by pkmiec 12y ago
2048
16.
by pkmiec 13y ago
I've been using passenger for quite some time and really appreciate its focus on operational tools. Thanks for the detailed comparison. Good to know how it stacks up against the other options out there.
17.
by pkmiec 14y ago
I totally agree about refinements being a terrible idea. Brian Ford (of Rubinous) makes an excellent argument: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BagNfTbXn3w . What is the best way to let Ruby team know that refinements are a bad idea?
18.
by pkmiec 14y ago
I'm still on the election. It took me a while to realize the title if referring to the university and not the presidential candidate.
19.
by pkmiec 14y ago
Ditto on the bad uptime and data retention. I've also had issues with support taking a week to respond. In addition, exceptional does not support looking at the data in interesting ways (i.e. exceptions from this machine, exceptions for thi
20.
by pkmiec 14y ago
We implemented something like this at the place I work. We have a tiny ruby process, based on event machine, that subscribes to various queues (we happen to use RabbitMQ). When a message arrives, the process makes a request to the passenger
21.
by pkmiec 14y ago
what's the ??? quest?
22.
by pkmiec 15y ago
I just did 4 domains.