pixelatedindex

6 ms·

1.
by pixelatedindex 4d ago
This stance is so anti-consumer it's laughable. Are you seriously implying LG doesn't turn a decent profit with their massive empire? There's an issue with capitalism of chasing infinite growth rather than stability, and this
2.
by pixelatedindex 4d ago
Explicitly choosing to help improve something by providing your data seems like an opt-in but what do I know these days
3.
by pixelatedindex 6d ago
I thought we were talking about digital copies.
4.
by pixelatedindex 6d ago
I’m not denying that? What is the argument here?
5.
by pixelatedindex 6d ago
> We do not own the same copy of that book Why not? If you hash the book, it’ll match. It’s word for word the same book (editions not withstanding). It’s not the same if you tie in account permissions, of course. Or is this on a philosop
6.
by pixelatedindex 12d ago
I really don’t understand why this is being downvoted? Did I say something wrong / controversial? Or is it because I’m not using my resources the “optimal” way? Is it because my models aren’t open weight? I was only trying to contribut
7.
by pixelatedindex 13d ago
I for one am running what I can on my aging 1080Ti(!!), namely a Qwen2.5 14B (4-bit quantized). It’s not great, and the only other card I have is a 3070Ti but I need that for gaming. :( What a terrible card that 3070Ti is. Mad regrets buyin
8.
by pixelatedindex 15d ago
> If Google were to die they would die the way Yahoo did This might be true 20 years ago where Google had one true product, Search. Since then, they have diversified and got their fingers a million pies. I don’t think you can get true co
9.
by pixelatedindex 15d ago
Oh crap, not my intention!
10.
by pixelatedindex 15d ago
You’re overly focusing on the IQ, and completely hand waving the structural advantages. You do not understand.
11.
by pixelatedindex 15d ago
> This dude's car breaks down and he gives up on university? It seems like you’re overly harsh on this dude. Being wealthy and well connected lets you circumvent the kind of stuff Chris had to go through. Bill didn’t even need to fi
12.
by pixelatedindex 15d ago
It even almost reads like “Borges”, at least on the top. The design is remarkable.
13.
by pixelatedindex 15d ago
Thanks, I did some digging. My biggest issue is Andrew Jervis not running Bandcamp Weekly anymore. I loved that show :(
14.
by pixelatedindex 16d ago
Epic bought bandcamp many moons ago. Did they enshittify it or is it still going strong?
15.
by pixelatedindex 19d ago
No wonder Google was all: > L'utilisation de la violence ou de menaces armées n'est pas une solution. When I tried to search for what that meant. Thanks, kind stranger! My curiosity is sated. PS: What Google said translates to
16.
by pixelatedindex 20d ago
Why would state AGs even agree to such a thing? It is absurd
17.
by pixelatedindex 20d ago
Is human programming going anywhere? I mean sure you’re not literally typing the actual lines of code, but we haven’t done assembly since compilers and transpilers exist. Personally, all AI has done is add another layer of abstraction where
18.
by pixelatedindex 21d ago
Why are we holding the engineers accountable and not the CEO? The company isn’t one department. Responsibility should bubble up to the top.
19.
by pixelatedindex 26d ago
Absolutely. And honestly, I don't think AI can really replace that. It can execute a plan, but it can't really figure out the best plan from a sea of unknowns strewn within people's minds. There's a certain meditative as
20.
by pixelatedindex 27d ago
I sympathize with this take but I think it’s conflating programming as a hobby vs code needed to run a business. I always believed that programming was solving problems and building things. With AI, you can still solve problems - the better
21.
by pixelatedindex 1mo ago
I wonder why if this is the reason for the icon color of the game Olo. The left half of the icon background looks so similar. https://www.eurogamer.net/olo-review
22.
by pixelatedindex 1mo ago
https://youtu.be/l6DKRf-fAAM maybe? Title is “Reinventing Entropy” And of course the neural network series.
23.
by pixelatedindex 1mo ago
Did they validate the result? Is it correct / accurate? If it is, then it passes the “good enough” test. For non-tech folks who just vibe code a fix, “technical debt” is not in their vocabulary. And if it works well, I don’t see the is
24.
by pixelatedindex 1mo ago
That’s fair pushback. I concluded that this was the underlying assumption because I couldn’t surmise anything else because you had said this: > The implication is that vaccines saved X lives. This could convince most of the people. But s
25.
by pixelatedindex 1mo ago
> So the point being 1000 deaths from X to 0 deaths from X does not necessary mean X lives saved. Yes, this statement is a non-sequitur. A vaccine preventing death from X does not prevent a death from other causes. That doesn’t mean X is
26.
by pixelatedindex 1mo ago
This comment implies that Claude Code is a harness, but as an AI newbie I don’t think that’s a harness? If anything it’s just a sandbox, right?
27.
by pixelatedindex 1mo ago
> Are those kids who are not dying of X (thanks to the vaccine), are dying of something else? Now the picture is not so clear. Why is it not so clear? If they are not dying of X then the vaccine did the job and technically saved the kid’
28.
by pixelatedindex 1mo ago
The statement “These are child safety laws” premises that the laws would save children - so the way to refute is to ask for proof. Outside of vaccines I doubt there is anything concrete that will directly benefit children. There is no argum
29.
by pixelatedindex 1mo ago
If only I could pay my bills with thumbs up emojis. I can even double my offering from one to two!
30.
by pixelatedindex 1mo ago
Aren't they (where they = tech CEOs, at least) all?

More ›