pinnochio

6 ms·

1.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
It's not fear mongering when they lay out a good argument, which is not what you're doing. It's fascinating that you and nick49488171 both characterize this article in ways that no reasonable person would ("pearl clutchi
2.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
Drip with contempt, much?
3.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
I don't advocate for using either OpenAI or Anthropic. But you can say one is better while both are still unacceptable. I don't see a viable case for arguing that they're equally bad, though you might quibble over the differe
4.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
I agree it won't fix the problem, but marginal drops in labor supply and skill can still have an impact.
5.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
Why not replace the battery? It's fairly cheap.
6.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
I was able to thumb type at high speed and accuracy on the 3.5 inch iPhones. On modern iPhones, I produce more typos than ever, because apparently Apple thinks it knows which key I meant to hit better than I do, even with all the autocorrec
7.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
Not sure where you are, but you should be well within the return period?
8.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
> in this case it's simply a case of a edge they didn't test. It's not for lack of trying either. Agreed. And because responsible driving is almost all edge cases, they shouldn't be held liable for any of them as long
9.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
# of sticky non-paying users still gives them more investment juice than per user costs deducts, since we're still in the speculative phase.
10.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
You absolutely did, but are you not aware that cmd+` allows you to switch between windows?
11.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
Funny to read this after reading all the dismissive comments on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47028923
12.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
Or, you know, they actually have a point, and framing them as just another partisan is an uncharitable response. Which, ironically, is typical of partisans.
13.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
This is your third top-level comment on this thread, when you're still in the edit window for the first. These are also pretty poor comments. Did you have some prior beef with Chomsky?
14.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
Are you a sophist, or have you made any actual attempt to understand the concerns here?
15.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
You're quoting the NYT article. If you're going to criticize the Commission's language for being "vague and handwavy", you should quote the original source.
16.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
> Who are you to suggest they are less happy than otherwise? Who are you to assume they always are? Once again, you're just dismissing the problems away. > They took that decision voluntarily. As if nobody in the history of the w
17.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
Maybe social media of the kind which creates this problem isn't sustainable or wise.
18.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
_you_ don't seem to understand what I wrote, or are not attempting to genuinely respond to it. But you've demonstrated a certain thickheadedness, potentially willful, so I can't say I was expecting better.
19.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
Who says this particular job is a necessary one?
20.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
Why does it have to be done?
21.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
I'm not sure what you mean by 'metaphysical' here, but I get the impression that you're dismissively trivializing real psychological problems by using that word. An improvement in material conditions does not straightfor
22.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
AFAIK, after all the hype around Bitcoin proved to be false, the last justification for owning it among people who can't think straight was as a systemic risk hedge, like gold, but this has also not borne out. I don't doubt the fa
23.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
> In those days they did this by having physical public spaces for interaction, which we've since priced people out of through artificial scarcity of real estate via zoning laws. IDK where to begin with this, because we clearly do h
24.
by pinnochio 7mo ago
> But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Mr. Dishonest accusing others of being dishonest. > More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believ
25.
by pinnochio 8mo ago
This is correct.
26.
by pinnochio 8mo ago
Shortly after, AI-powered prosthetic hands that mimic your handwriting will write those 2 sentences for you.
27.
by pinnochio 8mo ago
You're explaining why they invest, not why they make pie-in-the-sky non-binding announcements. The point of those is to inflate the bubble and keep it going as long as they can.
28.
by pinnochio 8mo ago
No, that's not what he's doing.
29.
by pinnochio 8mo ago
It sounds like the first one, based on Gemini, will be more a more limited version of the second ("competitive with Gemini 3"). IDK if the second is also based on Gemini, but I'd be surprised if that weren't the case. Se
30.
by pinnochio 8mo ago
I don't think he's good , but afaik he isn't trying to make everyone psychologically dependent on Claude and releasing sex bots.

More ›