pierreb

3 ms·

1.
by pierreb 7y ago
The term they use is "online content sharing platform" + some rules about organizing content. Please see the text, it is a bit messy, I think it is better than quoting parts of it here. Depends on how you interpret it.
2.
by pierreb 7y ago
Sorry -- not all affected platforms are run by "big corporations". All for-profit plateforms over 3 years old are affected, even small ones. This will severely harm the EU startup scene in that category.
3.
Mozilla speaks out on French intelligence bill(blog.mozilla.org)
1 points by pierreb 11y ago|0 comments
4.
Eu.org will move its nameservers out of France due to the new Intelligence Law(eu.org)
6 points by pierreb 11y ago|0 comments
5.
by pierreb 17y ago
"It's pretty much universal for comments to have the same visibility as the item to which they are attached." But Buzz does not even quite work like that. Any commenter can extend the visibility to one of his contacts (a totally different s
6.
by pierreb 17y ago
It does expose (by full name) any contact who comments on one of your Buzzes. It's far from being obvious when you are using Buzz for the first time that your comments will be seen not just by the Buzz author; it's also far from obvious ini
7.
by pierreb 17y ago
They certainly did to me. They spammed my Gmail contacts with my RSS feed and Orkut profile picture without my consent; these are separate accounts and I intended to keep them separate. So Google forced my hand on that and I may forgive, bu
8.
What Google needs to learn from Buzz backlash(news.cnet.com)
1 points by pierreb 17y ago|0 comments