Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
piamancini
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
piamancini
5y ago
Open Collective takes 5% and the other 5% goes to the non profit that provides fiscal sponsorship for the projects.
2.
▲
by
piamancini
5y ago
It's 10% which gets shared 5% & 5% between the platform and the non for profit that is the custodian of the funds (and provides compliance, tax filing, 1099s,etc)
3.
▲
by
piamancini
5y ago
oh but it is! github.com/opencollective :)
4.
▲
by
piamancini
5y ago
yes~ check this out: funoss.org coming soon (disclosure, I am Open collective co-founder)
5.
▲
by
piamancini
5y ago
Hi Chris! Open Collective Inc. is a for profit company, we develop and run the open collective platform, opencollective.com The Open Source Collective is a non profit, a 501c6 that gives fiscal sponsorship to projects so they can receive pr
6.
▲
by
piamancini
5y ago
You have a point! The goal though is not for one FUND to support they entire ecosystem but for many funds supporting it. 1k from one fund and 3k from another for example + recurring subscriptions from individuals, end up adding up. (disclos
7.
▲
by
piamancini
5y ago
Hi! Pia here from Open Collective - In the FUNDS case the fees are taken when the Fund is created. Donations from the Fund are free of fees afterwards. Since the Funds are generally bank payments, there's no Stripe fees in this case.
8.
▲
by
piamancini
6y ago
Hi Francisco - Pia from Open Collective here. Thanks for the ping on this. We deployed a quick fix to reduce the width and we'll look at it with more time.
9.
▲
by
piamancini
6y ago
Hi - Pia from Open Collective here. Thanks for the ping on this. We deployed a quick fix to reduce the width and we'll look at it with more time.
10.
▲
Funding ESLint's Future
(eslint.org)
3 points
by
piamancini
8y ago
|
0 comments
11.
▲
by
piamancini
8y ago
For those projects in countries with stripe, they can use open collective with their own stripe account. Fees are half since we don’t do fiscal sponsorship (they would self host) and the benefits is that we have the whole subscription /
12.
▲
by
piamancini
8y ago
Hey Joe, I'm one of the founders of Open Collective (opencollective.com) Happy to help if you have any questions on how to implement or if we can help out somehow.
13.
▲
by
piamancini
9y ago
webpack does this on their open collective: https://medium.com/webpack/webpack-2-2-the-final-release-76c...
14.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
What would an alternative be for you?
15.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
I agree, we have a long roadmap ahead and all your points should be in it. If you wish to contribute, by all means github.com/democracyos. It's an open source project.
16.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
We met Tom Atlee lately, he is fantastic. His insights on how to move forward, the importance of diversity in the process, where super sharp. I would add to the list, When People Speak by Fishkin and check Marina Gorbis' book on The Na
17.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
Thank you!
18.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
For sure! Being Open Source it's fundamental to the spirit and vision of DemocracyOS.
19.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
It's crazy what's happening in Brazil these days, as a close neighbour(Argentinean) it pains me to see such upheaval. To your point, we could set up a protocol that the SaaS version of DemocracyOS can only be used inside the limit
20.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
maybe we could think about a two-tier system were we delegate only decisions that should be taken our of the hands of majority and to the citizens the huge number of decisions that we can make that affect our every-day lives. I think the o
21.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
hi! some pilot live implementations with council-members in the US: marfarrell.democracyos.org (SF) benkallos.democracyos.org (NYC). Would love to know your thoughts. pia@democracyos.org
22.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
Hi! We are trying to get enough philanthropic seed funding to find a sustainable model. Maybe OS SAS, or github's: free as long as it's open. For the moment it's all grants.
23.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
We are working to validate democracyOS votes with the blockchain. Happy to listen to any other suggestions
24.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
This is exactly the type of conversation we want to have. What institutions can we design for the internet society?
25.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
It's a super valid point. We are not claiming all decisions should be taken this way. But we can imagine a system where a large chunk of decisions can be devolved to the citizens. The constitution and the bill or rights provide a frame
26.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
Thank you! Totally agree with the branching aspect and yesterday we were playing with some ideas to order debate in pros&cons. Also, we are looking for funding to form a blockchain team, to validate democracyos votes in bc. All ideas ar
27.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
we are launching the hub now where everyone, even the pirate party in argentina can have their own democracyos and raise their own issues. Stay tuned
28.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
make up your mind, are we or are we not a party? if we are not, as you got tired if claiming then it's not illegal.
29.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
I agree with you. We've outsourced citizenship and thinking for a long time. It's a long road ahead the one to reverse this.
30.
▲
by
piamancini
12y ago
We lost representation this year, but the Pirate Party was never a political party in Argentina. They didn't even run for elections once. So please...
More ›