Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
phoghed
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
phoghed
3d ago
Why didn't you go with the shaft and hinge?
2.
▲
by
phoghed
3d ago
Yeah that's definitely the source of the didn't RTFA epidemic, surely.
3.
▲
by
phoghed
3d ago
Obviously you have to turn your WMD against them to prevent this, for the good of everyone, because you're such a good guy.
4.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
Oh, white
5.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
Sam Altman is filling out some government form, what’s he picking on the race/ethnicity question: * American Indian or Alaska Native * Asian * Black or African American * Hispanic or Latino * Middle Eastern or North African * Native Ha
6.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
> No you see, actually I’m the guy that makes sure that only the Palantir and Mossad get the model that can discover iOS 0 days. I’m standing between us and ruin. Ted over there across the open office, he’s the one actually manufacturing
7.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
I think the “next token prediction” is too dismissive and reductive a framing of their capabilities at this point. Yes we all know that’s what they do, and guns just push a few grams of lead out of a pipe. It’s what you can do with that cap
8.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
They allegedly believe the technology itself is a nuclear weapon tier threat or greater, so why does it matter which lab they are trying to achieve it at?
9.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
Sorry I assumed you read the whole thing, forgot where I was for a moment
10.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
Even if this hypothesis that smaller specialized models are superior to larger models in a task as broad as software development, hyperscalers and the hyperfunded would still maintain a massive advantage in that they could just train 1000x
11.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
Yes I covered that after the comma if you didn’t make it that far. This sentence quoted just doesn’t seem like the AI smoking gun to choose given the rest of the content.
12.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
I think it’s less than reasonable to operate mainly on vibes, rumors, and hearsay. You don’t need to think about climate change studies. Instead you can read the allegedly tainted studies we’re actually talking about and profess to all of u
13.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
All we do with these things is some work though
14.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
It would be nice to hear exactly how the conflict of interest has impacted the specific studies and how they are wrong rather than conspiracy theory level speculation and hand waving at the entire category
15.
▲
by
phoghed
4d ago
> And then subtly misuse them. For example?
16.
▲
by
phoghed
5d ago
That line doesn’t strike me as overtly AI written, overall yes though
17.
▲
by
phoghed
5d ago
How is that in any way equivalent to and ad buy on Reddit?
18.
▲
by
phoghed
5d ago
Sometimes I think you guys run your browser like this just to make these performative comments
19.
▲
by
phoghed
5d ago
> That’s also because we didn’t migrate to a Zanzibar-style system like SpiceDB or OpenFGA. Adopting one would mean rewriting every permission check and asking every self-hosted customer to run another stateful service and introduce brea
20.
▲
by
phoghed
5d ago
The point is that nearly every white collar worker is in the same boat right now, and the majority of them probably have already had much more profound impacts to their fields. So yeah, we can certainly imagine what it’s like for mathematic
21.
▲
by
phoghed
5d ago
How good were you at those “A is to B as C is to D” SAT questions?
22.
▲
by
phoghed
5d ago
Yeah bro, same for probably the majority of this site that write software for a living and/or hobby.
23.
▲
by
phoghed
5d ago
> No one is interested in watching two machines compete I’ve watched quite a lot of YouTube videos where two machines compete, so you may not be completely right here
24.
▲
by
phoghed
6d ago
> making it illegal doesn't stop it from happening. Arguing to give kids unfettered access to it but won’t even use it yourself to fact check your own nonsense
25.
▲
by
phoghed
6d ago
Seeing what it’s done to my VP’s and execs I can’t imagine the damage it’s going to children smh
26.
▲
by
phoghed
6d ago
> And what about the ads people, adding such a thing if you don't load their ads? Through what mechanism? You don’t load their code, so then they presumably load this malicious code? If they could do that they would have just loaded
27.
▲
by
phoghed
6d ago
Hopefully as AI coding continues to improve they’ll come to view it like chess players do Stockfish
28.
▲
by
phoghed
6d ago
This is every enterprise service at this point. Let’s look at my enterprise search provider. We self host so pay for the infrastructure. We provide/pay for the models for embeddings or any LLM stuff. We still pay them consumption based
29.
▲
by
phoghed
7d ago
Freeways seems to be safer though https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2023/f...
30.
▲
by
phoghed
7d ago
Just found out Google didn’t index a googol pages. Lying to me about everything this whole damn time smh
More ›