philreinking

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by philreinking 3y ago

   The intention is clear, but you are exaggerating your argument by comparing a plane with a car. The Tailwind example is a much more feature complete product, then your „lightweight“ copy. Also, as I said it might be written with another int
2. 2.▲
   by philreinking 3y ago

   I think we all can agree that this article is not based on a proper comparison between Tailwind CSS and what the author calls “semantic CSS”. I understand, from authors’ comments here, that it does not aim to be a perfect copy. But arguing
3. 3.▲
   by philreinking 9y ago

   Founder here: Got feedback or questions? Ask me anything!
4. 4.▲
   Why you don’t need AI to build a chatbot(hackernoon.com)

   3 points by philreinking 9y ago|0 comments