pheaded_while9

14 ms·

1.
by pheaded_while9 2mo ago
What's the difference between glasses and an iron lung? Only the degree, severity, dependance, impact, consequence, social implication, dehumanization, and every other meaningful aspect!
2.
by pheaded_while9 2mo ago
There is nothing new under the sun. You fail to address my clear moral objection with these irrelevant historical instances. It has no rhetorical value in this context.
3.
by pheaded_while9 2mo ago
Gameification of war is the literal worst thing I ever heard. Lords of War, eat your heart out.
4.
by pheaded_while9 2mo ago
I see you're being blammed. "They hated him because he spoke the truth." Just because this online character is from your alma mater website doesn't mean he's not cynically and shamelessly self-promoting.
5.
by pheaded_while9 2mo ago
This demonstrates the problem with an education that has no emphasis on the liberal arts, such as critical thinking. No justification is needed for why and how these names are easy to understand.
6.
by pheaded_while9 3mo ago
You're gesturing at some fundamental limit that, if it exists, there is no evidence of peaking yet. It is not rigorous to say AI has not contributed to architecture improvement.
7.
by pheaded_while9 3mo ago
Then this is a "Death of the gaps" which implies algorithm, eg Conway's, may solve AI non-life. So, not a fundamental denial but an architectual one.
8.
by pheaded_while9 3mo ago
If we are still following Schroedinger, this imbues humanity with the ability to train non-life into life, not that thing being not alive. Not that I do or am, just going by GP's criteria.
9.
by pheaded_while9 3mo ago
Does the press being an ad constitute the same thing as the information being false? If I advertize that my gun is dangerous, does the medium impact the truth value?
10.
by pheaded_while9 3mo ago
Agreed, and their zeroeth order prerogative isn't much better: to ensure the continued need and demand for the thrall of centralized authority that allows them to achieve their disparate goals. This ensures strong AI is never going to
11.
by pheaded_while9 3mo ago
You are correct: there is a right and wrong. Rights are actions which do not initiate harm in the form of murder, assault, rape, theft, trespass, coercion, or deception. Wrong actions are the initiation of harm. What is truly lost is the a
12.
by pheaded_while9 3mo ago
Exactly. It is clear as crystal that Epstein was (is) a Mossad honeypot.
13.
by pheaded_while9 3mo ago
Wait, why suggest it will "make a mess" of something when the prior in this case was a succesful debug? It doesn't feel very fair to say.
14.
by pheaded_while9 4mo ago
Consciousness is the causal factor, not government. You are putting the cart before the horse to insist on any political solution.
15.
by pheaded_while9 5mo ago
That simile breaks down because - unlike the state of the economy - the collective human capacity to understand, design, and produce these systems essentially only goes one way, barring the apocolyptic.
16.
by pheaded_while9 5mo ago
How so? If a person were confined to text only (a la Hawkins), does that qualify us to dismiss their subjectivity on the basis of the medium? Also, why can training not be at least analogized to the attunement to the popular intersubjecti
17.
by pheaded_while9 5mo ago
Where you are wrong is about controlling values. Axioms, incentives, and rhetorical framing are not "organic" in that they happen without a controlling force. See Prussian education, Rockefeller medicine, and your good ol' id
18.
by pheaded_while9 5mo ago
Yes, the social darwinist approach inevitably lead to eugenical thinking and the human meat grinder that follows. We, as being with the capacity to understand harmful v. non-harmful behaviour, have a consequence to harmful behaviour, collec
19.
by pheaded_while9 6mo ago
The violence of the state makes the market not "free." Unless you want to abstract all the way out: the planet is and always has been run through violent coercion by psycopaths, and, as exampled by reality, they are "free&quo