phafu

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by phafu 2mo ago

   While there is certainly quite a bit of truth to what you say, I have a few counter arguments: > same order of magnitude as the code implementing it I believe mathematically formulating what an algorithm should do is very often orders of
2. 2.▲
   by phafu 1y ago

   For my purpose I don't need to get back to the original source, no. The gcc part is only relevant with regards to what dialect of assembler I need to parse. If I go that route, I'd write a parser for the GNU assembler, and that wo
3. 3.▲
   Ask HN: Help with doing statistics over machine code

   2 points by phafu 1y ago|2 comments
4. 4.▲
   by phafu 2y ago

   I'm wondering if it would rather make more sense to emulate a CRT with a video projector and some shutter device (maybe a fan?) in front. Has anyone tried that yet?
5. 5.▲
   by phafu 2y ago

   thx, fixed
6. 6.▲
   Show HN: Nondeterministic finite queued dialog automaton(gitlab.com)

   29 points by phafu 2y ago|2 comments
7. 7.▲
   by phafu 2y ago

   At least for user space usage, I'm not sure a new kernel thing is needed. Quite a while ago I have implemented a user space (single producer / single consumer) ring buffer, which uses an eventfd to mimic pipe behavior and function
8. 8.▲
   Show HN: Tiny embedded scripting language (in modern C++)(gitlab.com)

   27 points by phafu 4y ago|0 comments