pffft8888

6 ms·

1.
by pffft8888 3y ago
They can do this in people, too, not just LLMs. Imagine the mistakes that can be made by changing one fact but not reconfiguring the whole network. Thhese guys remind me of when I used to change EXEs in hex editors then notice "unrelat
2.
by pffft8888 3y ago
Feeling left out?
3.
by pffft8888 3y ago
That's 66 bits of entropy. With a quantum computer having 66 logical (error corrected) qubits, the pass phrase can be cracked in under a day. That's not too far off, maybe a few years before one is commercially available.
4.
A community fork of Rust for “unrestricted use”(github.com)
3 points by pffft8888 3y ago|0 comments
5.
by pffft8888 3y ago
get it from the horse's mouth, as they say... instead of baselessly pontificating on HN and not understanding the diff between algorithm and implementation
6.
by pffft8888 3y ago
"even if these attacks aren't feasible against current algorithms" lol, ok, if you say so....
7.
by pffft8888 3y ago
2048 words in 6 positions is simply not enough entropy for the NSA's encryption cracking infrastructure. If it is worth it they'll crack it. The NSA does not use a single ASIC cracker.
8.
by pffft8888 3y ago
not the algorithm. the various implementations of it. evidence? ask a friend.
9.
by pffft8888 3y ago
Why would they have Suite A then?
10.
by pffft8888 3y ago
You can't trust what sama says. Period. He's shown his willingness to deceive for gain. He deleted the codex model because it was better than the text model and only way to explain it is that by training on code instead of just te
11.
by pffft8888 3y ago
The worst thing about HN (and it does reflect badly on YC as a whole, at least for me) is how they enable people to act in seemingly passive aggressive ways. Instead of stating disagreements, they downvote, and you'll never know why. J
12.
by pffft8888 3y ago
The propaganda against encryption is in full swing. My expectation is that all NSA CNSA[1] encryption standards are backdoored at the implementation level (by the NSA who uses Suite A for its own communication and I suspect military communi
13.
by pffft8888 3y ago
You just got validated. Does that mean you're desperate? or anxious? or even sick in the head?
14.
by pffft8888 3y ago
But the person is complaining about people complaining. I find it ironic.
15.
by pffft8888 3y ago
Says a person who is online...
16.
by pffft8888 3y ago
I take that back I'm suyrprised. HN crowd is mostly very pedestrian.
17.
by pffft8888 3y ago
Yes. I'm just surprised at the downvotes. Hmm. We're talking about jobs, right? Everyone's job is very much at risk unless people adapt to a P2P economy with humans and AIs in it, trading with and employing each other.
18.
by pffft8888 3y ago
The sky is falling... etc. It is true, however, that AI is going to reduce a team of 10 to 1, regardless of what field they're in. One day soon we will see companies run by an AI employing umans for 1:1 sales only, until we become more
19.
by pffft8888 3y ago
Bitcoin is based against the wisdom that "all that glitters is not gold." It abuses the "shiny object" trigger in our animal brain. The minute it looks shiny, its price goes up, and vice versa. It's become a way for
20.
by pffft8888 3y ago
Altman is v2.0 of Zuckerberg, with 1000X more parameters. I'm worried about v3.0
21.
by pffft8888 3y ago
Weird coincidence, I tweeted roghly the same idea two weeks ago: https://twitter.com/marcfawzi/status/1636115903959158785 Obviously, it's a no-brainer idea at a high level. The devil is in the details.
22.
by pffft8888 3y ago
AI is not a weapon. It's ultimately a synthetic brain running inside a machine. It can be used for good, or it can be mounted on a killer drone with deadly lasers. If you use it for evil, you go to jail. It should be as simple as that.
23.
by pffft8888 3y ago
Meanwhile, experiments to create Synthetic Life, including novel basis for life and possibly new viruses as a lab exercise (that may leak like the GoF virus did in Wuhan) proceed with no oversight or calls for pausing. We can unplug the AI
24.
by pffft8888 3y ago
Every CEO of every major US company is a US intelligence asset.
25.
by pffft8888 3y ago
It's a great smoke screen for sure. They've been wanting to do this for ages. Now they have an excuse. Some would even venture to say that they knew about FTX and let it slide until it blew up, same way they knew the Saudis were f
26.
by pffft8888 3y ago
I got flagged in the other thread. It was because I said the gov is going mad with power. This is not about Binance. They are going after Coinbase, too. They are trying to severe the connections between tradFi and deFi. They are also trying
27.
by pffft8888 3y ago
Who gets to define them as unregistered securities? The SEC claimed BUSD is a security and shut it down. If stabelcoins pegged against the dollar with provable 1:1 reserves are a security then... SEC needs to be dismantled or reset.
28.
by pffft8888 3y ago
The message with the FBI coordinating with social media platforms to censor Americans and now gov agencies going after Coinbase (the company that has tried hard to stick to the letter of the law, which is a valid position in a capitalist co
29.
by pffft8888 3y ago
ThaIt seems the moderators took sides here, and flagged this whole thread, which means that HN moderation is morally suspect, which I knew it was goiing in.
30.
by pffft8888 3y ago
I hoe your take is satire too because you miss the core moral issue, so flippantly The core moral isse is he took in money for Open and Transparent AI and turned it into Closed and Opaque AI. That is the bait-and-switch. You're simply

More ›