peteradio

13 ms·

1.
by peteradio 2y ago
> The lesson is, business people will gladly let safety lapses occur with software because I'm going to stop you right there and refer you back to the 4lb hammer. If you are being pushed around to build violently shitty stuff you a
2.
by peteradio 2y ago
> DAG of other devices Its well known you can infer the safety of a specification by assessing a small subset of its features. Quod erat demonstrandum. /s But seriously, this is how backdoors are trivially integrated.
3.
by peteradio 2y ago
That was 40 years ago! What lessons were learned from that are even relevant to this? Should I be worried about early days development lessons today or the billion of lines code dependency for a simple medical device? You are aware of th
4.
by peteradio 2y ago
> slapdash in-house solution that will almost certainly be worse. Truly libelous shilling for the app store.
5.
by peteradio 2y ago
Ok but hands off my chickens hoa clucker
6.
by peteradio 2y ago
I've seen self described "product owners" claim to build using LLM outputs without knowing how to code.
7.
by peteradio 2y ago
Money won by definition is not lost so therefore I'm rich!
8.
by peteradio 2y ago
I guess a general application of statistics and control is going to be called ML then? If that's the world we're living in then I wonder how the missing fraction are being governed. Pure malice?
9.
by peteradio 2y ago
> All he had to do to win was use a different stick shaped object for the test. His WEEEENNUS?????
10.
by peteradio 2y ago
I'm saying that forcing particular technology leads to worse products in many cases.
11.
by peteradio 2y ago
Teams doesn't even do copy paste or open Microsoft based formats in under 10 seconds (IME)... I rest my case.
12.
by peteradio 2y ago
I'm not talking about LLMs in particular. I guess this is a company wide mandate to grow knowledge of how to do this stuff well, I mean that makes sense. But in the trenches (aka hells-ahole) that means a lot of bad bad stuff is bein
13.
by peteradio 2y ago
Does it make a difference of context whether or not they've successfully shoehorned only 99%?
14.
by peteradio 2y ago
> Half the time an engineer is sitting around thinking or drinking all the coffee. Is that supposed to sound like a bad thing? > tangible improvements, process cranking, or institutional knowledge, the most valuable people are the adm
15.
by peteradio 2y ago
It's true I'll hate on micrsoft for about anything but they didn't say "some products" "some services" "some processes", they said "EVERY SINGLE THING!!!", see the difference?
16.
by peteradio 2y ago
> AI models are used in almost every one of our products, services and operating processes at Microsoft Oh boy. Any insight from microsfot peoples on this apparent hell-hole?
17.
by peteradio 2y ago
In particular I'm refuting the study that purports to measure NO DIFFERENCE with or without a hood. I am saying that is so far outside the realm of the every man's experience with vent hoods that I think the study is busted in
18.
by peteradio 2y ago
Hate to say it, but I don't know how trust worthy those studies are especially the one claiming vent hoods have no impact! If I cook bacon on my stove without a venthood the entire main floor would reek and require opening windows and
19.
by peteradio 2y ago
Indeed, in python you can just eval.
20.
by peteradio 2y ago
Nah uh! We are still warring! Israel winks at Gaza, Iran squeezes the U.S.A's ass.
21.
by peteradio 2y ago
I used to hide porn deep in the lotus folder cache. We are kindred spirits!
22.
by peteradio 2y ago
I don't know if people anticipated contemporary parroting behavior over huge datasets. Modern well funded models can recall an obscure persons home address buried deep into the training set. I guess the techniques described might be
23.
by peteradio 2y ago
I know its fun to beatoff dead horses.
24.
by peteradio 2y ago
No worries girl! Plenty of tards livin kick ass lives! My first wife was tarded, now she works at microsfot.
25.
by peteradio 2y ago
The assistants might be good enough to produce homework level or test level answers to contrived questions. But then utterly fall over in a real world codebase.
26.
by peteradio 2y ago
Thousands of new MBAs are minted each day, practically a commodity at this point.
27.
by peteradio 2y ago
I prefer cooking in my own kitchen with gas stove and range hood than my parents with induction and no hood. It is a disgusting mess to cook on a stove without a hood.
28.
by peteradio 2y ago
> Yes it does: all cooking will generate chemicals, but you're adding extra ones by using a combustible heat source. All that goes up the hood and outside. Criticize the hood not the range if its not functioning properly. Browning
29.
by peteradio 2y ago
Bilk Gates infected you with windows, perhaps some sort of parasitic control is causing you to believe it was mutually beneficial.
30.
by peteradio 2y ago
Weak examples which are utterly penetrated by the inevitable phallus.

More ›