petar

5 ms·

1.
by petar 3y ago
The underlying software architecture and the motivation behind it are outlined in the whitepaper of the (more complex) gov4git project: https://github.com/gov4git/doc/blob/main/whitepaper/whitepap...
2.
A non-federated decentralized social protocol based on Git(github.com)
103 points by petar 3y ago|42 comments
3.
Decentralized Governance for Git Communities(github.com)
14 points by petar 4y ago|2 comments
4.
Governance for Git(github.com)
2 points by petar 4y ago|0 comments
5.
Step-by-step guide to the Ko programming language(github.com)
3 points by petar 8y ago|1 comments
6.
Ko – A concurrent, immutable, functional language(github.com)
116 points by petar 8y ago|65 comments
7.
The Institute for Figuring(theiff.org)
1 points by petar 10y ago|0 comments
8.
His Holiness Gyalwang Karmapa's Open-Source Digitizing of the Buddha's Teachings(github.com)
2 points by petar 11y ago|0 comments
9.
by petar 11y ago
Have you looked at gocircuit.org and the accompanying language for connecting templates Escher.io? They are still not production ready, but aiming to solve your problem in a general way. The circuit simply says you should be able to write t
10.
by petar 11y ago
Escher can have circuits with any number of communication "valves", so ternary is ok.
11.
by petar 11y ago
Yes, the handbook is a complete Escher application. It simply creates a static file hierarchy while patching snippets of things together. Escher is experimental and I am iterating on other variations too. This one however is stable and comp
12.
New site, documentation and tutorial for the Circuit(gocircuit.github.io)
3 points by petar 11y ago|0 comments
13.
by petar 11y ago
You can exercise the option to buy the Seaboard right away.
14.
Selling a spot in line to buy a Seaboard Stage Piano now
1 points by petar 11y ago|1 comments
15.
Paradigm for building clouds with Circuit and Escher(gocircuit.github.io)
1 points by petar 12y ago|0 comments
16.
by petar 12y ago
because it disturbs the visual perception and prevents people from glossing.
17.
by petar 12y ago
I will definitely consider your comments on "speech grandiosity"! They are good points. Thank you.
18.
by petar 12y ago
The language for expressing constraints is what different, not the meaning. People are confused because they properly evaluate that you can do with this language what you can do with any other. But only up to a point of scale. Then the bugs
19.
by petar 12y ago
Thanks for the link!
20.
by petar 12y ago
Yes. Be patient a few more weeks, as I have other obligations too. I will have demos how you can make your own gesture-controlled robotics at home, using Escher bindings for the gobot.io library
21.
by petar 12y ago
I apologize, if it's a little over the top. But being over the top is the only way to get people to really think: out of anger to prove you wrong. It's just true. But I have no intention to offend anyone.
22.
by petar 12y ago
Choiceless Computation is how the "outside" world looks to an Escher program. This is easier to understand, if you study go circuit.org because it is a concrete product not just a semantic. There: A program starts and sees nothing
23.
by petar 12y ago
That's correct. For instance, I discovered the link to Choiceless Computation AFTER I invented Escher. It is a real mathematical connection, and I only bothered with it, because academics will not look at my work unless you shove some
24.
by petar 12y ago
Thanks for the link! It's time to meet my peers. I will say to all people who find similarities between my work and cognitive scientists or neuroscientists: I have never read a line of text on either of these subjects, nor have I ever
25.
by petar 12y ago
I am glad. The truth is: Eventually every mind, in trying to save itself from "repetitive" work, reaches the same conclusion: recursive metaphorical programming. It comes out in different buzz words "flow-programming", &
26.
by petar 12y ago
Yes. All the functional programming language had the right idea (as you point out). But not the right grammar. Escher has 3 grammar rules (reflex, circuit and valve). All these other languages have much much more. That's the point.
27.
by petar 12y ago
The whole point is that the gate-designer decides if their gate works in various directions (there are usually much more than 2 or 3). And this simply means that if they get a stream of events coming in in the wrong order, they can choose h
28.
by petar 12y ago
It looks familiar to every other language you know and yet to no one in specific. That's the point: It unifies them all as a common denominator and you have to break out of your conventional thinking to see the differences. Alternative
29.
by petar 12y ago
Yes: At a smentic linguistic level. Not as a physical substance. At which point you ask: What is a physical substance formally? Well, that depends on your dictionary of the world. Cognition is relative, people don't get that :) There i
30.
by petar 12y ago
Not incidentally. The Voynich manuscript simply demonstrates that if you mix concepts at all scales of visual perception (color, texture, page organization, etc.) the document looks un-intelligible yet familiar. Incidentally, so do Escher&#

More ›