pesus

5 ms·

1.
by pesus 5d ago
This is a ridiculous and incoherent belief. Ensuring children have enough food to survive isn't making life "too comfortable". Letting millions of children starve and/or never get an education because you don't like
2.
by pesus 7d ago
It's baffling how oblivious these people appear to be. I still can't tell if it's an act or not. If it is, what benefit do they get from playing dumb? If not, how did we let people who don't understand basic cause and ef
3.
by pesus 3mo ago
Fair enough, but I wish the blatantly racist comments got the same response. Maybe they get flagged more quickly.
4.
by pesus 3mo ago
As I am strongly against that as well.
5.
by pesus 3mo ago
Being non-white isn't a bad thing, that's why.
6.
by pesus 3mo ago
People born in the country are illegal migrants? That's a first.
7.
by pesus 3mo ago
I have no idea what you're trying to say.
8.
by pesus 3mo ago
What does this mean? Be specific.
9.
by pesus 3mo ago
> "They will also be forced to leave, even if they are born in Sweden, because they have no natural connection to Sweden. They are not Swedish." - Markus Allard
10.
by pesus 3mo ago
Is that so? Instead of throwing a fit and insulting people, you could've just spent 30 seconds googling to see what the party leader himself says: > In a podcast segment about immigration and deportations Allard stated his opinion a
11.
by pesus 3mo ago
Maybe we can start with not supporting companies that have cofounders that directly financially support ethnic cleansing.
12.
by pesus 3mo ago
What? That's what the party is in favor of, and the thing you said every single left wing party from the 90s supported. Why can't you back up what you say? Is it because the Democratic Party did not support ethnic cleansing in the
13.
by pesus 3mo ago
It's not a "witch hunt" to be against ethnic cleansing and not want to financially support that.
14.
by pesus 3mo ago
Apparently that's asking too much of people these days, if the not at all suspicious flood of comments defending ethnic cleansing is any indication.
15.
by pesus 3mo ago
Source that every single left wing party in the 90s wanted to get rid of every single person of a non-white background?
16.
by pesus 3mo ago
You don't think there's a difference between a founder and a random employee?
17.
by pesus 3mo ago
It's pretty clear you didn't get beyond the very basics of music production or house music if you think this. I'd love to hear your masterfully produced house track to prove me wrong, though.
18.
by pesus 3mo ago
Currently, it's the US government, who is very opposed to renewable energy sources and very in favor of data centers/AI.
19.
by pesus 3mo ago
It wasn't directed at you personally, but I think the fact that you dismiss opposition to data centers/AI as "fears, anxieties, and hardships" [...] "being exploited by demagogues attempting to consolidate their pow
20.
by pesus 3mo ago
Thanks for the response, but unfortunately "common sense" is not a source. And unfortunately, these aren't actual examples of medical progress being made. AI in some capacity is absolutely going to be helpful for medical rese
21.
by pesus 3mo ago
> All the technological innovations since humanity has had this characteristic and I don't see why AI would be different. Then you should have no problem pointing to concrete examples of how it's actually improved life for the
22.
by pesus 3mo ago
You have multiple comments calling anyone opposed to AI in any way an "educated elite". If you don't accept that framework, stop using it.
23.
by pesus 3mo ago
None of this changes the fact that average people aren't elites, no matter how much you may try to spin it that way. And ironically, your comment and views are themselves extremely simplistic. New technology is not inherently progress.
24.
by pesus 3mo ago
OpenAI isn't a convincing source. Of course they're going to blame everything on someone else. They don't want to acknowledge the very real hate for AI that people have. It's also extremely likely that they themselves ar
25.
by pesus 3mo ago
The current far right government/movement (aka conservatives) is far more in favor of AI than people opposed to them. You seem to be labeling just about everything as the opposite of what it actually is. Are you invested in or working
26.
by pesus 3mo ago
> AI benefits everyone while also benefitting the billionaires - even disproportionately. Source? Also, you seem to be (probably intentionally) mixing up who's an elite and who's not. The people controlling and profiting from A
27.
by pesus 3mo ago
Source? And I suppose that depends on whether I die first from not having access to healthcare after AI takes my job.
28.
by pesus 3mo ago
> If you are trying to take on the hyperscalers why not push for UBI vs trying to stop the buildout? Is the former really that much more difficult than the latter? I'm really not trying to be rude, but have you followed US politics
29.
by pesus 3mo ago
You're right, but that doesn't mean opinions will evolve towards viewing the technology more positively. With AI, it's increasingly the opposite.
30.
by pesus 3mo ago
We have a higher chance of the world ending than getting UBI in America. This is a country that can't even get basic universal healthcare going. Even if we did somehow get UBI, with who's controlling the country, there's almo

More ›