Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pero
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
P645-MG, but any P645 will do really.
2.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
As someone who doesn't live in California, will this bill (indirectly) make available to me the service manual for my Acer Travelmate? I've search high and low and absolutely can't get my hands on one.
3.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
no idea about PoE on either board but if i/o is a concern you might want to take a look at the $25 rock64 with gbe and usb3 - i/o on my neo1 maxes out somewhere just below 20mb/s but my rock64 has no problem doing 80mb/s
4.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
yes
5.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
i have some nanopi neo(1)s and they're rock solid - my rule of thumb with arm boards is that support is good enough if it has an armbian _debian_ (vs just armbian ubuntu) release
6.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
pretty sure it's just for its press releasibility but ok
7.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
is their real supercomputer 32bit? because if it's not then i'm not sure how they are validating anything
8.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
no it's not inconsequential for one, why are _researchers_ using largely obsolete technology; for another, many high performance computing tasks perform significantly faster on 64bit (e.g., lmdb)
9.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
you do understand that 'better supported' in the case of the raspberrypi means that you are running a 32bit os? that's all they officially support - and have no plans to change do you really think something or better and chea
10.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
if we are 'considering the ecosystem' then that means these are running a 32bit os, as mentioned in my original comment
11.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
you can buy at least 2 nanopi neo2's for every rpi3b - they have gbe and a non-gimped soc, and you can fit in at least 2 for every rpi, maybe even 4 there are also more powerful alternatives of the same footprint and at same or slightl
12.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
i don't even know where to start understanding this remark i am questioning why they are using immensely popular and commensurately overpriced but yet woefully underspecced components instead of something better and/or cheaper is
13.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
waste of (taxpayer) money using the (overpriced) rpi's gimped (no aes, usb3, gbe) soc the rpi value prop is the community support but that would mean that this cluster is running a 32bit os - so what really is the point of using these
14.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
> What's the motivation here then? I'd guess it's some sort of legal/accounting move, something beneath the surface. Doesn't really make much sense otherwise.
15.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
says debian 8.* and 7.* which i take to mean 8.1 and 7.1, expressly excluding 9
16.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
no debian 9?
17.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
Blockchain analysis investment perhaps delivering some ROI. http://www.sandia.gov/news/publications/labnews/articles/201... https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/7xz35e
18.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
Blockchain analysis can tie transactions with KYC'd identities. http://www.sandia.gov/news/publications/labnews/articles/201... https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/7
19.
▲
AlphaBay, the Largest Online 'Dark Market,' Shut Down
(justice.gov)
104 points
by
pero
9y ago
|
130 comments
20.
▲
by
pero
9y ago
Intellectually and academically dishonest hitpiece by peddlers of a competing cryptocoin. That this subset of transactions is not safe is not news, nor is it even original research - it was covered in research more than 2 years ago by The
21.
▲
by
pero
10y ago
As a little cherry on top, the CPU they sourced is also crippled with no onchip crypto. Even the half-price Pine64 has a CPU with crypto instruction sets.
22.
▲
by
pero
10y ago
The original comment purports that ridiculous enrichment schemes are a carpet necessary evil for initial and continued development of cryptocurrencies, which is simply not true - what you're pointing out is a different argument.
23.
▲
by
pero
10y ago
Not _all_ cryptocurrencies, no - it's mostly just the scammy ones of little genuine utility and/or technological merit. Both Bitcoin and Monero have fair distribution; development of neither is done by for-profit LLCs financially
24.
▲
by
pero
10y ago
It seems like they might have somehow ignored direction from as early as February... https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-Februa...
25.
▲
Linux kernel maintainer says no to AMDGPU patch
(lists.freedesktop.org)
446 points
by
pero
10y ago
|
263 comments
26.
▲
by
pero
10y ago
Did you read the blogpost? It's basically a Zcash presskit - note the surely calculated title, and the omission of any actual "anonymous" competitor coins in the first paragraph as well as the entire article, all at a time w
27.
▲
by
pero
10y ago
http://archive.is/wdNh3 http://archive.is/vnmkv
28.
▲
by
pero
10y ago
5 hours and almost 100 comments later no one has pointed out that Zcash and Keybase share the same investors. I am relieved that 'Keybase chose Zcash' purely on merit after an exhaustive and objective selection process, and that t
29.
▲
by
pero
10y ago
The Monero blockchain is comprised of inputs and outputs - public keys/one-time addresses to power of 10 denominated amounts into which each transaction is split and mixed with past public keys of identical power of 10 amounts. There a
30.
▲
by
pero
10y ago
I don't think you understand how Monero works _at all_ - let me fix one of your arguments to illustrate: >When you spend money, you basically say "I am one of 2^256 people", where 2^256 is usually fairly small. Disappointi
More ›