peab

13 ms·

1.
by peab 5d ago
Some of the models claim to be audio to audio, like one of the Gemini models. But I've tested and it does seem that you're right, it's not getting all the nuance at all
2.
by peab 5d ago
That's great- i recently went down the same path! I was using grok in my car but got frustrated it wouldn't keep track. Built my own app, currently focused on having it generate stories for me at my level, and also doing FSRS fla
3.
by peab 7d ago
I think a lot of artists want to have psychosis because it would improve their art ahaha. On a more serious note - real art is not validated by making money. If you want to be a full time artist, then you also have to run a business. But if
4.
by peab 7d ago
I don't think I elaborated on the type of person that I would consider having AI psychosis. It isn't just being enthusiastic. What I've seen (and it's not common, but I've seen it a few times), is this sort of arrog
5.
by peab 7d ago
I was talking to a friend recently, and i think i aligned with a similar definition. I've seen people who talk nonstop about AI, and how it's changed everything, but then there's no quantifiable output that supports their cla
6.
by peab 7d ago
Yes, but the baseline is the amount of fraud/crime that happens without crypto - which is extremely high.
7.
by peab 7d ago
Sure, but that takes generations to change, unfortunately
8.
by peab 10d ago
I'm not sure if there is actually any evidence of this? Criminals do very well without crypto. If you look at percent of the economy that is fraudulent, it is quite large. If you look at percentage of crypto economy that is fraudulent,
9.
by peab 15d ago
I just can't stand how often Claude says something like "And the honest part? It's..." Like, were the other parts not honest? I don't understand how Anthropic let it get like this, it's been such a clear regres
10.
by peab 22d ago
Would you say the same thing about people not knowing assembly after compilers came out?
11.
by peab 26d ago
I think I agree. But it's nice to have the option. Furthermore, i think it's too early to see the results of this, as technology takes a while to diffuse. Since there are so many people trying to take advantage of the hype to make
12.
by peab 26d ago
True, i agree. Which is why it will take quite some time for this technology to diffuse and for people to learn which apps really are good
13.
by peab 26d ago
Food production is at record highs last time i checked, thanks to technology
14.
by peab 26d ago
It relates to software making my life better, as OP said he can't see any examples of this
15.
by peab 27d ago
This comment comes up over and over again and it's incredibly ignorant. To give just a single example, ai code dev has enabled people to make tools for themselves that they didn't have before. I've made a language learning ap
16.
by peab 1mo ago
to be fair, all it's doing is sampling the frames and maybe doing transcription, if I'm not mistaken. So you can do it with the other models too, you just need to sample the frames yourself and do the transcript yourself
17.
by peab 1mo ago
gemini flash is probably the best model for visual tasks right now. they also make it really easy to ingest videos
18.
by peab 1mo ago
I also agree with this. LLMs are a great companion when reading a book to clarify things and dive into specific topics. I'd imagine an application that uses LLMs will be created that better manages learning. It's just not clear wh
19.
by peab 2mo ago
Look at this one: https://x.com/Zahri_10i/status/2078211494349537447?s=20
20.
by peab 2mo ago
I've seen a few that have been shared - I'll link them here if I can find them. I think right now most people here and on twitter have no taste, and post slop that were just sort of one shotted. But there are people using these to
21.
by peab 2mo ago
at this point, it's pretty easy to create evals/benchmarks, and then run the latest model on them. LLMs are so easy to swap out, so having good benchmarks/evals are pretty useful. Even then, a lot of the time the model improv
22.
by peab 2mo ago
No, not really. My comments are organic - they come from a place of frustration, seeing such trivially wrong arguments against data centers. All the arguments I see against data centers are arguments against industrialization. There are als
23.
by peab 2mo ago
exactly. All of the arguments I see against data centers are simply arguments against industrialization. The dirty water bit is the most ridiculous thing. It's meant to paint the picture that the data centers themselves are using the w
24.
by peab 2mo ago
yeah I had this happen to me. Except when I go to maintain it, now cursor/claude are good enough to essentially handle it on their own, so it turns out to be very low effort to maintain.
25.
by peab 2mo ago
there's an unnatural amount of doomerism against datacenters, of exactly this kind. It's pretty obviously astroturfed.
26.
by peab 2mo ago
i noticed a thing with headlines like these: "x may cause y". Whenever it's "may" or "might", it's almost always meaningless
27.
by peab 2mo ago
This is great! I disagree with some of the commenters here that the originals sound better. The originals sound very much like demos, and from a producer's perspective are very low quality (no offense). They're definitely more raw
28.
by peab 2mo ago
I don't think that's true anymore
29.
by peab 2mo ago
Where are you getting that from, that they're ok with CSAM? I think they've been clear that they want to follow the law. Every image gen provider struggles with this. I worked for an image gen app years before it became popular (W
30.
by peab 2mo ago
>The best feature is that it can delegate questions out to GPT-5.5 in the background, so you're no longer restricted to a voice model that's several years behind the frontier. Ahh, this makes sense. I was wondering when they wo

More ›