Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
panny
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
1.
▲
by
panny
5d ago
>This war started as a regime change operation in Iran I believe this war started with a tomahawk missle murdering a school full of children and then the US denying involvement. I very clearly remember it. US attacks Iran unprovoked. Fir
2.
▲
by
panny
5d ago
Techbros: It's fine to demand ID verification for everything, except voting, because that's racist. But, it's nice that Anthropic is finally admitting claude is just a casino of code. Keep pulling that one armed bandit, maybe
3.
▲
by
panny
7d ago
We're all ants. You can't see the whole sky by design. That's the "guard rails" they talk about. The non-technical marketing person can't use it because they don't understand programming tools. AI is by pr
4.
▲
by
panny
9d ago
I couldn't finish reading the salespitch because it's ai slop. Which tells me the software side is probably just slop too.
5.
▲
by
panny
16d ago
Why is it only perverted when we film each other? Not when those black dome cameras film us at a store or restaurant or a flock camera films us on the road?
6.
▲
by
panny
17d ago
And once again, you guys make this claim without reading the law. >several provisions of the Copyright Act imply that it uses the word "author" only to refer to human beings, including provisions (1) vesting copyright ownership
7.
▲
by
panny
17d ago
Yes, that's exactly what it means. AI works are public domain by default. Copyright law requires the work is created with human creativity. The essential piece is to clearly define what parts are AI generated vs human written. This is
8.
▲
by
panny
17d ago
Once again, I will point you to the law, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922 You did not write it, the AI did. Either the work cannot be copyright, or the AI owner (Anthropic) owns the code. Not you. In no ca
9.
▲
by
panny
17d ago
I don't disagree with you on this. However, it is clear to me that a lot of copyfraud is happening in this industry right now. Just look at all the github repos with a) a licnese.txt and b) a claude.md in the repo.
10.
▲
by
panny
17d ago
Anthropic is right here. You need to clearly define what commits are AI authored or you are conspiring to commit copyfraud. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyfraud AI does not enjoy copyright protection. Pretending you
11.
▲
by
panny
19d ago
Hey, I thought "rawdogging" sounded pretty authentic. Does claude say rawdogging now too?
12.
▲
by
panny
19d ago
Sure, but who in Trump's DOJ is going to prosecute Trump? Separation of powers my ass.
13.
▲
by
panny
19d ago
In every good market crash, there's a flash point. In 2008, it was the Lehman Bros collapse and congress refusing the initial bailout. This might be the flashpoint, 75 data centers blocked this year and a supermajority of Americans aga
14.
▲
by
panny
19d ago
>That’s not hypothetical. That’s POSIX working exactly as designed. I'm so tired of AI voice.
15.
▲
by
panny
20d ago
I'm pretty sure Soundgarden predicted this :)
16.
▲
by
panny
20d ago
I'm puzzled how people who didn't care about Snowden are suddenly very upset about Flock. I'm glad they finally decided the 4A is important.
17.
▲
by
panny
20d ago
Cringe. Cards are fun, collectable, and never run out of battery. Mine is a custom limited edition card from a Japanese chocolate factory. https://matcha-jp.com/en/9482
18.
▲
by
panny
21d ago
> I argue that there will be plenty for us to work on, grounded in the “AI as normal technology” thesis There is no doubt that AI is creating more work than it produces. Every single line it writes has to be reviewed by someone because A
19.
▲
by
panny
22d ago
What open medium would you suggest as an alternative to X? I miss the days when we had an RFC, people got together, came up with a solution, and we ended up with decentralized NNTP or something. Everything is someone's little kingdom n
20.
▲
by
panny
24d ago
Maybe it's time to stop burning food as fuel. What are the jets going to do anyway, bomb Iranian children? Remember when George W Bush signed into law the corn ethanol bill. Corn tripled in price within 8 years. Fuel didn't get ch
21.
▲
by
panny
26d ago
>LLMs are causing slow, bloated, code are going to eat crow once they re-write everything in super-optimized assembly LLMs have caused such an increase in ram prices that pine64 is no longer making linux machines. When you can't aff
22.
▲
by
panny
26d ago
Think for a moment. What is the difference between giving them a password which wipes the phone and giving them a password which opens a blank phone? It's the same thing. They punched in a code, they are presented with a wiped phone. C
23.
▲
by
panny
26d ago
I'm healthier than my neighbors. I carry 4-6 gallons of water a mile every couple of days on foot. I don't own a car either, I ride a bicycle. If my neighbors and I share medical costs, I'm definitely losing a lot there. My n
24.
▲
by
panny
26d ago
I was expecting to open the link and see clamav :) If you don't exclude the data dir from scanning, it will kill your database.
25.
▲
Why Package Signing is not the Holy Grail (2013)
(caremad.io)
2 points
by
panny
26d ago
|
0 comments
26.
▲
by
panny
28d ago
>one of the biggest and simplest is getting commute time back Zoom out. Being full remote means I don't even need a car. I can live in a walkable city with passenger rail in a low cost of living location. I can reduce my living expe
27.
▲
by
panny
28d ago
Civic Hygiene is the opposite of how you were taught to write code... >It should be noted that no ethically-trained software engineer would ever consent to write a DestroyBaghdad procedure. Basic professional ethics would instead require
28.
▲
by
panny
28d ago
>you cannot ignore politics and just "focus on technology." Stallman was right again https://www.azquotes.com/quote/755239
29.
▲
by
panny
1mo ago
My goal is to move to LineageOS by the end of the month since Google is being such an asshole about "sideloading" (installing) applications. Losing this antifeature will be a nice bonus.
30.
▲
by
panny
1mo ago
I know most of these flock cameras are going up in low income black neighborhoods [1] to "protect" them, but don't these wealthy neighborhoods need "protection" too? 1: https://www.wvtf.org/news/
More ›